CSP1 vs SWDA: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 IndexSWDA tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

CSP1 turned it into
£42,477
+15.56% per year on average · 2016–2025
SWDA turned it into
£34,992
+13.34% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+£7,486
CSP1 made more of the same money

CSP1 vs SWDA, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
CSP1 won
12
years
SWDA won
5
years
YearCSP1SWDAWinner
2026 (so far)+14.27%+13.45%CSP1
2025+9.37%+12.64%SWDA
2024+27.35%+21.11%CSP1
2023+19.79%+17.59%CSP1
2022-9.05%-8.33%SWDA
2021+31.07%+23.64%CSP1
2020+13.65%+12.25%CSP1
2019+26.42%+23.03%CSP1
2018+0.01%-3.78%CSP1
2017+10.83%+11.78%SWDA
2016+34.10%+29.59%CSP1
2015+5.78%+4.06%CSP1
2014+22.03%+12.58%CSP1
2013+31.40%+25.32%CSP1
2012+7.14%+9.19%SWDA
2011+1.73%-6.19%CSP1
2010-26.08%+14.57%SWDA
2009—-34.91%—

CSP1 vs SWDA in plain words

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SWDA charges 0.20% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 12 times and SWDA 5 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £42,477 in CSP1 versus £34,992 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CSPX is the London (USD) listing and SXR8 the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — CSP1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and EUNL (Xetra, EUR) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — SWDA is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: CSP1 vs SWDA

FactCSP1SWDA
FundiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched19 May 201025 Sept 2009
ISINIE00B5BMR087IE00B4L5Y983
£10,000 investedWhat £10,000 in CSP1 becameWhat £10,000 in SWDA became

How bumpy the ride was: CSP1 vs SWDA

These head-to-head figures use only the 4,137 trading days both funds were listed: 19 May 2010 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 16.4 years.

CSP1 swung more than SWDA: annualised volatility of 17.8% for CSP1 against 14.6% for SWDA, with CSP1 moving 1% or more on 21.9% of trading days and SWDA on 20.8%. CSP1's worst day was -35.99% on 15 Sept 2010; SWDA's was -7.75% on 12 Mar 2020.

CSP1 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -38.13% from its peak on 9 Aug 2010 to a low on 22 Aug 2011, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 20 months after the low; SWDA fell -25.58% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.79, and they closed in opposite directions on 7.0% of the 4,136 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 15 Sept 2010, when CSP1 moved -35.99% and SWDA -1.08%.

MeasureCSP1SWDA
Annualised volatility17.8%14.6%
Worst day-35.99% on 15 Sept 2010-7.75% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+9.33% on 29 Dec 2010+6.41% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more21.9% of days20.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-38.13%-25.58%
Peak to trough9 Aug 2010 → 22 Aug 201119 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak14 May 2013 · 20 months2 Sept 2020 · 5 months

Years CSP1 and SWDA parted ways

In 6 of the 16 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2010: CSP1 returned -26.08% and SWDA +14.57%, a gap of 40.7 points. They rose together in 12 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 3 years.

YearCSP1SWDAGap (CSP1 − SWDA)
2024+27.35%+21.11%+6.2 pts
2021+31.07%+23.64%+7.4 pts
2014+22.03%+12.58%+9.4 pts
2013+31.40%+25.32%+6.1 pts
2011+1.73%-6.19%+7.9 pts
2010-26.08%+14.57%-40.7 pts

How often CSP1 beat SWDA over any 12 months

Across the 185 rolling 12-month windows since May 2010, measured month-end to month-end, CSP1 finished ahead in 78.4% of them (145) and SWDA in 21.6% (40).

12-month windows
185
month-end to month-end, overlapping
CSP1 ahead
78.4%
145 of 185 windows
SWDA ahead
21.6%
40 of 185 windows

£200 a month into each, 2011–2025

Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2011 to December 2025 (180 payments, £36,000 in total) would have grown to £126,152 in CSP1 and £101,257 in SWDA, leaving CSP1 £24,895 ahead.

OutcomeCSP1SWDA
Paid in£36,000£36,000
Value at the end of 2025£126,152£101,257
Gain on the money paid in+£90,152+£65,257
Gain in %+250.42%+181.27%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is CSP1 or SWDA better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 12 times and SWDA 5 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £42,477 in CSP1 versus £34,992 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between CSP1 and SWDA?

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SWDA charges 0.20% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, CSP1 or SWDA?

CSP1 swung more than SWDA: annualised volatility of 17.8% for CSP1 against 14.6% for SWDA, with CSP1 moving 1% or more on 21.9% of trading days and SWDA on 20.8%. CSP1's worst day was -35.99% on 15 Sept 2010; SWDA's was -7.75% on 12 Mar 2020.

Which had the deeper drawdown, CSP1 or SWDA?

CSP1 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -38.13% from its peak on 9 Aug 2010 to a low on 22 Aug 2011, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 20 months after the low; SWDA fell -25.58% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did CSP1 beat SWDA over a 12-month period?

Across the 185 rolling 12-month windows since May 2010, measured month-end to month-end, CSP1 finished ahead in 78.4% of them (145) and SWDA in 21.6% (40).

What would £10,000 in CSP1 have become?

£10,000 invested in CSP1 at the start of 2016 grew to £42,477 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring CSP1 or SWDA.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.