SWDA vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SWDA tracks the MSCI World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SWDA turned it into
£34,992
+13.34% per year on average · 2016–2025
CNX1 turned it into
£63,451
+20.29% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
−£28,459
CNX1 made more of the same money

SWDA vs CNX1, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
SWDA won
4
years
CNX1 won
13
years
YearSWDACNX1Winner
2026 (so far)+13.45%+21.89%CNX1
2025+12.64%+11.83%SWDA
2024+21.11%+28.51%CNX1
2023+17.59%+47.71%CNX1
2022-8.33%-25.53%SWDA
2021+23.64%+29.50%CNX1
2020+12.25%+43.24%CNX1
2019+23.03%+33.63%CNX1
2018-3.78%+4.62%CNX1
2017+11.78%+20.13%CNX1
2016+29.59%+28.85%SWDA
2015+4.06%+14.71%CNX1
2014+12.58%+28.19%CNX1
2013+25.32%+36.05%CNX1
2012+9.19%+9.20%CNX1
2011-6.19%+3.56%CNX1
2010+14.57%-20.33%SWDA
2009-34.91%——

SWDA vs CNX1 in plain words

SWDA tracks the MSCI World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SWDA charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SWDA is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SWDA finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 13 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £34,992 in SWDA versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and EUNL (Xetra, EUR) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — SWDA is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SWDA vs CNX1

FactSWDACNX1
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI World IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200926 Jan 2010
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00B53SZB19
£10,000 investedWhat £10,000 in SWDA becameWhat £10,000 in CNX1 became

How bumpy the ride was: SWDA vs CNX1

These head-to-head figures use only the 4,208 trading days both funds were listed: 26 Jan 2010 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 16.7 years.

CNX1 swung more than SWDA: annualised volatility of 14.7% for SWDA against 20.6% for CNX1, with SWDA moving 1% or more on 20.9% of trading days and CNX1 on 31.9%. SWDA's worst day was -7.75% on 12 Mar 2020; CNX1's was -35.97% on 15 Sept 2010.

CNX1 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -39.83% from its peak on 23 Apr 2010 to a low on 15 Sept 2010, then closed back above the old peak on 22 May 2013, 32 months after the low; SWDA fell -25.58% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.77, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.0% of the 4,207 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 15 Sept 2010, when SWDA moved -1.08% and CNX1 -35.97%.

MeasureSWDACNX1
Annualised volatility14.7%20.6%
Worst day-7.75% on 12 Mar 2020-35.97% on 15 Sept 2010
Best day+6.41% on 24 Mar 2020+6.26% on 2 Feb 2023
Days moving 1% or more20.9% of days31.9% of days
Deepest drawdown-25.58%-39.83%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202023 Apr 2010 → 15 Sept 2010
Back above the old peak2 Sept 2020 · 5 months22 May 2013 · 32 months

Years SWDA and CNX1 parted ways

In 13 of the 16 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2010: SWDA returned +14.57% and CNX1 -20.33%, a gap of 34.9 points. They rose together in 12 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 3 years.

YearSWDACNX1Gap (SWDA − CNX1)
2024+21.11%+28.51%-7.4 pts
2023+17.59%+47.71%-30.1 pts
2022-8.33%-25.53%+17.2 pts
2021+23.64%+29.50%-5.9 pts
2020+12.25%+43.24%-31.0 pts
2019+23.03%+33.63%-10.6 pts
2018-3.78%+4.62%-8.4 pts
2017+11.78%+20.13%-8.3 pts
2015+4.06%+14.71%-10.7 pts
2014+12.58%+28.19%-15.6 pts
2013+25.32%+36.05%-10.7 pts
2011-6.19%+3.56%-9.7 pts
2010+14.57%-20.33%+34.9 pts

How often SWDA beat CNX1 over any 12 months

Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SWDA finished ahead in 21.2% of them (40) and CNX1 in 78.8% (149).

12-month windows
189
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SWDA ahead
21.2%
40 of 189 windows
CNX1 ahead
78.8%
149 of 189 windows

£200 a month into each, 2011–2025

Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2011 to December 2025 (180 payments, £36,000 in total) would have grown to £101,070 in SWDA and £193,909 in CNX1, leaving CNX1 £92,840 ahead.

OutcomeSWDACNX1
Paid in£36,000£36,000
Value at the end of 2025£101,070£193,909
Gain on the money paid in+£65,070+£157,909
Gain in %+180.75%+438.64%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SWDA or CNX1 better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SWDA finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 13 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £34,992 in SWDA versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SWDA and CNX1?

SWDA tracks the MSCI World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SWDA charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SWDA is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, SWDA or CNX1?

CNX1 swung more than SWDA: annualised volatility of 14.7% for SWDA against 20.6% for CNX1, with SWDA moving 1% or more on 20.9% of trading days and CNX1 on 31.9%. SWDA's worst day was -7.75% on 12 Mar 2020; CNX1's was -35.97% on 15 Sept 2010.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SWDA or CNX1?

CNX1 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -39.83% from its peak on 23 Apr 2010 to a low on 15 Sept 2010, then closed back above the old peak on 22 May 2013, 32 months after the low; SWDA fell -25.58% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did SWDA beat CNX1 over a 12-month period?

Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SWDA finished ahead in 21.2% of them (40) and CNX1 in 78.8% (149).

What would £10,000 in SWDA have become?

£10,000 invested in SWDA at the start of 2016 grew to £34,992 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.3% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SWDA or CNX1.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.