OriginaveSSAC (ISAC) vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SSAC
- CSP1iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the S&P 500 Index
- SSACiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
VWRPVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE All-World Index- VHVGVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
- SWDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Index
- CNX1iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VHYLVanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
- IWFViShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETFtracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index
- IWFMiShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
- IWFQiShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
CNX1
- CSP1iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the S&P 500 Index
- SSACiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
- VWRPVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE All-World Index
- VHVGVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
- SWDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Index
- CNX1iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VHYLVanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
- IWFViShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETFtracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index
- IWFMiShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
- IWFQiShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SSAC vs CNX1, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SSAC | CNX1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +14.58% | +21.89% | CNX1 |
| 2025 | +13.95% | +11.83% | SSAC |
| 2024 | +19.63% | +28.51% | CNX1 |
| 2023 | +16.14% | +47.71% | CNX1 |
| 2022 | -8.56% | -25.53% | SSAC |
| 2021 | +20.35% | +29.50% | CNX1 |
| 2020 | +11.80% | +43.24% | CNX1 |
| 2019 | +22.09% | +33.63% | CNX1 |
| 2018 | -4.76% | +4.62% | CNX1 |
| 2017 | +13.26% | +20.13% | CNX1 |
| 2016 | +29.60% | +28.85% | SSAC |
| 2015 | +1.60% | +14.71% | CNX1 |
| 2014 | +11.27% | +28.19% | CNX1 |
| 2013 | +21.20% | +36.05% | CNX1 |
| 2012 | +9.30% | +9.20% | SSAC |
| 2011 | -35.63% | +3.56% | CNX1 |
| 2010 | — | -20.33% | — |
SSAC vs CNX1 in plain words
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 12 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Fund facts: SSAC vs CNX1
| Fact | SSAC | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 21 Oct 2011 | 26 Jan 2010 |
| ISIN | IE00B6R52259 | IE00B53SZB19 |
| Also trades as | ISAC | — |
| £10,000 invested | What £10,000 in SSAC became | What £10,000 in CNX1 became |
How bumpy the ride was: SSAC vs CNX1
These head-to-head figures use only the 3,771 trading days both funds were listed: 21 Oct 2011 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 15.0 years.
CNX1 swung more than SSAC: annualised volatility of 17.4% for SSAC against 18.6% for CNX1, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.0% of trading days and CNX1 on 31.9%. SSAC's worst day was -39.48% on 31 Oct 2011; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.
SSAC had the deeper drawdown: it fell -43.12% from its peak on 28 Oct 2011 to a low on 24 Nov 2011, then closed back above the old peak on 30 Jun 2016, 55 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.
Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.72, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.9% of the 3,770 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 31 Oct 2011, when SSAC moved -39.48% and CNX1 -1.00%.
| Measure | SSAC | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 17.4% | 18.6% |
| Worst day | -39.48% on 31 Oct 2011 | -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +6.33% on 24 Mar 2020 | +6.26% on 2 Feb 2023 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 20.0% of days | 31.9% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -43.12% | -27.56% |
| Peak to trough | 28 Oct 2011 → 24 Nov 2011 | 22 Nov 2021 → 28 Dec 2022 |
| Back above the old peak | 30 Jun 2016 · 55 months | 19 Jul 2023 · 6 months |
Years SSAC and CNX1 parted ways
In 12 of the 15 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2011: SSAC returned -35.63% and CNX1 +3.56%, a gap of 39.2 points. They rose together in 12 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 2 years.
| Year | SSAC | CNX1 | Gap (SSAC − CNX1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +19.63% | +28.51% | -8.9 pts |
| 2023 | +16.14% | +47.71% | -31.6 pts |
| 2022 | -8.56% | -25.53% | +17.0 pts |
| 2021 | +20.35% | +29.50% | -9.1 pts |
| 2020 | +11.80% | +43.24% | -31.4 pts |
| 2019 | +22.09% | +33.63% | -11.5 pts |
| 2018 | -4.76% | +4.62% | -9.4 pts |
| 2017 | +13.26% | +20.13% | -6.9 pts |
| 2015 | +1.60% | +14.71% | -13.1 pts |
| 2014 | +11.27% | +28.19% | -16.9 pts |
| 2013 | +21.20% | +36.05% | -14.9 pts |
| 2011 | -35.63% | +3.56% | -39.2 pts |
How often SSAC beat CNX1 over any 12 months
Across the 168 rolling 12-month windows since October 2011, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 18.5% of them (31) and CNX1 in 81.5% (137).
£200 a month into each, 2012–2025
Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2012 to December 2025 (168 payments, £33,600 in total) would have grown to £82,487 in SSAC and £159,554 in CNX1, leaving CNX1 £77,067 ahead.
| Outcome | SSAC | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | £33,600 | £33,600 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | £82,487 | £159,554 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +£48,887 | +£125,954 |
| Gain in % | +145.50% | +374.86% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SSAC or CNX1 better?
Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 12 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SSAC and CNX1?
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SSAC or CNX1?
CNX1 swung more than SSAC: annualised volatility of 17.4% for SSAC against 18.6% for CNX1, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.0% of trading days and CNX1 on 31.9%. SSAC's worst day was -39.48% on 31 Oct 2011; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SSAC or CNX1?
SSAC had the deeper drawdown: it fell -43.12% from its peak on 28 Oct 2011 to a low on 24 Nov 2011, then closed back above the old peak on 30 Jun 2016, 55 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.
How often did SSAC beat CNX1 over a 12-month period?
Across the 168 rolling 12-month windows since October 2011, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 18.5% of them (31) and CNX1 in 81.5% (137).
What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?
£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2016 grew to £33,247 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.8% per year.
Is ISAC the same as SSAC?
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or CNX1.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.