SSAC (ISAC) vs VWRP: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SSAC
VWRP
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index
What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
SSAC vs VWRP, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SSAC | VWRP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +14.58% | +14.68% | VWRP |
| 2025 | +13.95% | +13.94% | Tie |
| 2024 | +19.63% | +19.60% | SSAC |
| 2023 | +16.14% | +15.64% | SSAC |
| 2022 | -8.56% | -8.41% | VWRP |
| 2021 | +20.35% | +20.00% | SSAC |
| 2020 | +11.80% | +12.27% | VWRP |
| 2019 | +22.09% | +1.72% | SSAC |
| 2018 | -4.76% | — | — |
| 2017 | +13.26% | — | — |
| 2016 | +29.60% | — | — |
| 2015 | +1.60% | — | — |
| 2014 | +11.27% | — | — |
| 2013 | +21.20% | — | — |
| 2012 | +9.30% | — | — |
| 2011 | -35.63% | — | — |
SSAC vs VWRP in plain words
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VWRP follows the FTSE All-World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VWRP charges 0.19% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and VWRP 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £19,446 in VWRP by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
VWRA is the London (USD) listing and VWCE the Xetra (EUR) line of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRP is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange; VWRL is its distributing sibling.
Fund facts: SSAC vs VWRP
| Fact | SSAC | VWRP |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | FTSE All-World Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 21 Oct 2011 | 23 Jul 2019 |
| ISIN | IE00B6R52259 | IE00BK5BQT80 |
| Also trades as | ISAC | — |
| £10,000 invested | What £10,000 in SSAC became | What £10,000 in VWRP became |
How bumpy the ride was: SSAC vs VWRP
These head-to-head figures use only the 1,817 trading days both funds were listed: 25 Jul 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.2 years.
SSAC and VWRP swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.9% for SSAC against 14.8% for VWRP, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and VWRP on 20.4%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: SSAC closed -7.88% and VWRP -7.75%.
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: SSAC fell -25.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low; VWRP fell -25.10% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.99, and they closed in opposite directions on 2.9% of the 1,816 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 27 Sept 2022, when SSAC moved +0.37% and VWRP -1.01%.
| Measure | SSAC | VWRP |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 14.9% | 14.8% |
| Worst day | -7.88% on 12 Mar 2020 | -7.75% on 12 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +6.33% on 24 Mar 2020 | +6.27% on 24 Mar 2020 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 20.5% of days | 20.4% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -25.43% | -25.10% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 10 Sept 2020 · 5 months | 10 Sept 2020 · 5 months |
Years SSAC and VWRP parted ways
In 1 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: SSAC returned +22.09% and VWRP +1.72%, a gap of 20.4 points. They rose together in 6 years and fell together in 1 year.
| Year | SSAC | VWRP | Gap (SSAC − VWRP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | +22.09% | +1.72% | +20.4 pts |
How often SSAC beat VWRP over any 12 months
Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 54.7% of them (41) and VWRP in 45.3% (34).
£200 a month into each, 2020–2025
Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,556 in SSAC and £21,501 in VWRP, leaving SSAC £55 ahead.
| Outcome | SSAC | VWRP |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | £14,400 | £14,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | £21,556 | £21,501 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +£7,156 | +£7,101 |
| Gain in % | +49.70% | +49.32% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SSAC or VWRP better?
Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and VWRP 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £19,446 in VWRP by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SSAC and VWRP?
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VWRP follows the FTSE All-World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VWRP charges 0.19% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SSAC or VWRP?
SSAC and VWRP swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.9% for SSAC against 14.8% for VWRP, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and VWRP on 20.4%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: SSAC closed -7.88% and VWRP -7.75%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SSAC or VWRP?
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: SSAC fell -25.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low; VWRP fell -25.10% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.
How often did SSAC beat VWRP over a 12-month period?
Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 54.7% of them (41) and VWRP in 45.3% (34).
What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?
£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2020 grew to £19,479 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.
Is ISAC the same as SSAC?
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or VWRP.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.