VWRP vs IWFQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World IndexIWFQ tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VWRP turned it into
£19,446
+11.72% per year on average · 2020–2025
IWFQ turned it into
£19,114
+11.40% per year on average · 2020–2025
Difference
+£332
VWRP made more of the same money

VWRP vs IWFQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VWRP won
5
years
IWFQ won
3
years
YearVWRPIWFQWinner
2026 (so far)+14.68%+13.47%VWRP
2025+13.94%+7.40%VWRP
2024+19.60%+18.93%VWRP
2023+15.64%+19.15%IWFQ
2022-8.41%-9.55%VWRP
2021+20.00%+25.17%IWFQ
2020+12.27%+10.93%VWRP
2019+1.72%+25.86%IWFQ
2018—-2.34%—
2017—+12.47%—
2016—+26.01%—
2015—+7.50%—
2014—-33.59%—

VWRP vs IWFQ in plain words

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £19,114 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VWRA is the London (USD) listing and VWCE the Xetra (EUR) line of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRP is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange; VWRL is its distributing sibling.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing and IS3Q the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IWFQ is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VWRP vs IWFQ

FactVWRPIWFQ
FundVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE All-World IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.19%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched23 Jul 20193 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BK5BQT80IE00BP3QZ601
£10,000 investedWhat £10,000 in VWRP becameWhat £10,000 in IWFQ became

How bumpy the ride was: VWRP vs IWFQ

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,817 trading days both funds were listed: 25 Jul 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.2 years.

VWRP and IWFQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.8% for VWRP against 14.9% for IWFQ, with VWRP moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IWFQ on 20.6%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VWRP closed -7.75% and IWFQ -7.07%.

VWRP had the deeper drawdown: it fell -25.10% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low; IWFQ fell -23.91% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.97, and they closed in opposite directions on 8.0% of the 1,816 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 27 Sept 2022, when VWRP moved -1.01% and IWFQ +0.43%.

MeasureVWRPIWFQ
Annualised volatility14.8%14.9%
Worst day-7.75% on 12 Mar 2020-7.07% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+6.27% on 24 Mar 2020+5.53% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more20.4% of days20.6% of days
Deepest drawdown-25.10%-23.91%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak10 Sept 2020 · 5 months2 Sept 2020 · 5 months

Years VWRP and IWFQ parted ways

In 3 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: VWRP returned +1.72% and IWFQ +25.86%, a gap of 24.1 points. They rose together in 6 years and fell together in 1 year.

YearVWRPIWFQGap (VWRP − IWFQ)
2025+13.94%+7.40%+6.5 pts
2021+20.00%+25.17%-5.2 pts
2019+1.72%+25.86%-24.1 pts

How often VWRP beat IWFQ over any 12 months

Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VWRP finished ahead in 52.0% of them (39) and IWFQ in 48.0% (36).

12-month windows
75
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VWRP ahead
52.0%
39 of 75 windows
IWFQ ahead
48.0%
36 of 75 windows

£200 a month into each, 2020–2025

Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,501 in VWRP and £20,737 in IWFQ, leaving VWRP £764 ahead.

OutcomeVWRPIWFQ
Paid in£14,400£14,400
Value at the end of 2025£21,501£20,737
Gain on the money paid in+£7,101+£6,337
Gain in %+49.32%+44.01%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VWRP or IWFQ better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £19,114 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VWRP and IWFQ?

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, VWRP or IWFQ?

VWRP and IWFQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.8% for VWRP against 14.9% for IWFQ, with VWRP moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IWFQ on 20.6%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VWRP closed -7.75% and IWFQ -7.07%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VWRP or IWFQ?

VWRP had the deeper drawdown: it fell -25.10% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low; IWFQ fell -23.91% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did VWRP beat IWFQ over a 12-month period?

Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VWRP finished ahead in 52.0% of them (39) and IWFQ in 48.0% (36).

What would £10,000 in VWRP have become?

£10,000 invested in VWRP at the start of 2020 grew to £19,446 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VWRP or IWFQ.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.