OriginaveSSAC (ISAC) vs VHVG: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SSAC
- CSP1iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the S&P 500 Index
- SSACiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
VWRPVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE All-World Index- VHVGVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
- SWDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Index
- CNX1iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VHYLVanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
- IWFViShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETFtracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index
- IWFMiShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
- IWFQiShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
VHVG
- CSP1iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the S&P 500 Index
- SSACiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
- VWRPVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE All-World Index
- VHVGVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
- SWDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Index
- CNX1iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VHYLVanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
- IWFViShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETFtracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index
- IWFMiShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
- IWFQiShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
SSAC vs VHVG, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SSAC | VHVG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +14.58% | +14.90% | VHVG |
| 2025 | +13.95% | +13.85% | SSAC |
| 2024 | +19.63% | +19.99% | VHVG |
| 2023 | +16.14% | +17.54% | VHVG |
| 2022 | -8.56% | -8.16% | VHVG |
| 2021 | +20.35% | +22.64% | VHVG |
| 2020 | +11.80% | +12.56% | VHVG |
| 2019 | +22.09% | -17.91% | SSAC |
| 2018 | -4.76% | — | — |
| 2017 | +13.26% | — | — |
| 2016 | +29.60% | — | — |
| 2015 | +1.60% | — | — |
| 2014 | +11.27% | — | — |
| 2013 | +21.20% | — | — |
| 2012 | +9.30% | — | — |
| 2011 | -35.63% | — | — |
SSAC vs VHVG in plain words
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 2 times and VHVG 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Fund facts: SSAC vs VHVG
| Fact | SSAC | VHVG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | FTSE Developed World Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 21 Oct 2011 | 24 Sept 2019 |
| ISIN | IE00B6R52259 | IE00BK5BQV03 |
| Also trades as | ISAC | — |
| £10,000 invested | What £10,000 in SSAC became | What £10,000 in VHVG became |
How bumpy the ride was: SSAC vs VHVG
These head-to-head figures use only the 1,775 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Sept 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.0 years.
VHVG swung more than SSAC: annualised volatility of 14.9% for SSAC against 16.6% for VHVG, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and VHVG on 20.6%. SSAC's worst day was -7.88% on 12 Mar 2020; VHVG's was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019.
VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; SSAC fell -25.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.89, and they closed in opposite directions on 4.8% of the 1,774 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 26 Sept 2019, when SSAC moved +0.22% and VHVG -19.26%.
| Measure | SSAC | VHVG |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 14.9% | 16.6% |
| Worst day | -7.88% on 12 Mar 2020 | -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019 |
| Best day | +6.33% on 24 Mar 2020 | +6.18% on 24 Mar 2020 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 20.4% of days | 20.6% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -25.43% | -35.32% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 25 Sept 2019 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 10 Sept 2020 · 5 months | 13 Apr 2021 · 12 months |
Years SSAC and VHVG parted ways
In 1 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: SSAC returned +22.09% and VHVG -17.91%, a gap of 40.0 points. They rose together in 5 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | SSAC | VHVG | Gap (SSAC − VHVG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | +22.09% | -17.91% | +40.0 pts |
How often SSAC beat VHVG over any 12 months
Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 16.4% of them (12) and VHVG in 83.6% (61).
£200 a month into each, 2020–2025
Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,556 in SSAC and £21,951 in VHVG, leaving VHVG £395 ahead.
| Outcome | SSAC | VHVG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | £14,400 | £14,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | £21,556 | £21,951 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +£7,156 | +£7,551 |
| Gain in % | +49.70% | +52.44% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SSAC or VHVG better?
Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 2 times and VHVG 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SSAC and VHVG?
SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SSAC or VHVG?
VHVG swung more than SSAC: annualised volatility of 14.9% for SSAC against 16.6% for VHVG, with SSAC moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and VHVG on 20.6%. SSAC's worst day was -7.88% on 12 Mar 2020; VHVG's was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SSAC or VHVG?
VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; SSAC fell -25.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Sept 2020, 5 months after the low.
How often did SSAC beat VHVG over a 12-month period?
Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, SSAC finished ahead in 16.4% of them (12) and VHVG in 83.6% (61).
What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?
£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2020 grew to £19,479 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.
Is ISAC the same as SSAC?
ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or VHVG.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.