VHVG vs IWFV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World IndexIWFV tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VHVG turned it into
£20,355
+12.58% per year on average · 2020–2025
IWFV turned it into
£18,032
+10.33% per year on average · 2020–2025
Difference
+£2,323
VHVG made more of the same money

VHVG vs IWFV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VHVG won
4
years
IWFV won
4
years
YearVHVGIWFVWinner
2026 (so far)+14.90%+37.39%IWFV
2025+13.85%+30.69%IWFV
2024+19.99%+6.85%VHVG
2023+17.54%+13.02%VHVG
2022-8.16%+0.95%IWFV
2021+22.64%+21.60%VHVG
2020+12.56%-6.91%VHVG
2019-17.91%+14.69%IWFV
2018—-9.34%—
2017—+12.04%—
2016—+29.68%—
2015—+1.33%—
2014—-34.90%—

VHVG vs IWFV in plain words

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while IWFV follows the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and IWFV charges 0.25% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 4 times and IWFV 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £18,032 in IWFV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWVL is the London (USD) listing and IS3S the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZB59 — IWFV is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VHVG vs IWFV

FactVHVGIWFV
FundVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
TracksFTSE Developed World IndexMSCI World Enhanced Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.12%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched24 Sept 20193 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BK5BQV03IE00BP3QZB59
£10,000 investedWhat £10,000 in VHVG becameWhat £10,000 in IWFV became

How bumpy the ride was: VHVG vs IWFV

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,775 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Sept 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.0 years.

VHVG and IWFV swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 16.1% for IWFV, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and IWFV on 22.2%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; IWFV's was -10.99% on 12 Mar 2020.

VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; IWFV fell -28.79% from its peak on 20 Jan 2020 to a low on 12 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Mar 2021, 11 months after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.78, and they closed in opposite directions on 18.4% of the 1,774 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 26 Sept 2019, when VHVG moved -19.26% and IWFV 0.00%.

MeasureVHVGIWFV
Annualised volatility16.6%16.1%
Worst day-19.26% on 26 Sept 2019-10.99% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+6.18% on 24 Mar 2020+7.24% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more20.6% of days22.2% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.32%-28.79%
Peak to trough25 Sept 2019 → 23 Mar 202020 Jan 2020 → 12 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak13 Apr 2021 · 12 months8 Mar 2021 · 11 months

Years VHVG and IWFV parted ways

In 5 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: VHVG returned -17.91% and IWFV +14.69%, a gap of 32.6 points. They rose together in 4 years and went opposite ways in 3 years.

YearVHVGIWFVGap (VHVG − IWFV)
2025+13.85%+30.69%-16.8 pts
2024+19.99%+6.85%+13.1 pts
2022-8.16%+0.95%-9.1 pts
2020+12.56%-6.91%+19.5 pts
2019-17.91%+14.69%-32.6 pts

How often VHVG beat IWFV over any 12 months

Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 47.9% of them (35) and IWFV in 52.1% (38).

12-month windows
73
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VHVG ahead
47.9%
35 of 73 windows
IWFV ahead
52.1%
38 of 73 windows

£200 a month into each, 2020–2025

Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,951 in VHVG and £22,694 in IWFV, leaving IWFV £743 ahead.

OutcomeVHVGIWFV
Paid in£14,400£14,400
Value at the end of 2025£21,951£22,694
Gain on the money paid in+£7,551+£8,294
Gain in %+52.44%+57.60%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VHVG or IWFV better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 4 times and IWFV 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £18,032 in IWFV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VHVG and IWFV?

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while IWFV follows the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and IWFV charges 0.25% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, VHVG or IWFV?

VHVG and IWFV swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 16.1% for IWFV, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and IWFV on 22.2%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; IWFV's was -10.99% on 12 Mar 2020.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VHVG or IWFV?

VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; IWFV fell -28.79% from its peak on 20 Jan 2020 to a low on 12 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Mar 2021, 11 months after the low.

How often did VHVG beat IWFV over a 12-month period?

Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 47.9% of them (35) and IWFV in 52.1% (38).

What would £10,000 in VHVG have become?

£10,000 invested in VHVG at the start of 2020 grew to £20,355 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VHVG or IWFV.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.