VHVG vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
VHVG
CNX1
VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
VHVG vs CNX1, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VHVG | CNX1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +14.90% | +21.89% | CNX1 |
| 2025 | +13.85% | +11.83% | VHVG |
| 2024 | +19.99% | +28.51% | CNX1 |
| 2023 | +17.54% | +47.71% | CNX1 |
| 2022 | -8.16% | -25.53% | VHVG |
| 2021 | +22.64% | +29.50% | CNX1 |
| 2020 | +12.56% | +43.24% | CNX1 |
| 2019 | -17.91% | +33.63% | CNX1 |
| 2018 | — | +4.62% | — |
| 2017 | — | +20.13% | — |
| 2016 | — | +28.85% | — |
| 2015 | — | +14.71% | — |
| 2014 | — | +28.19% | — |
| 2013 | — | +36.05% | — |
| 2012 | — | +9.20% | — |
| 2011 | — | +3.56% | — |
| 2010 | — | -20.33% | — |
VHVG vs CNX1 in plain words
VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Fund facts: VHVG vs CNX1
| Fact | VHVG | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | FTSE Developed World Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.30% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 24 Sept 2019 | 26 Jan 2010 |
| ISIN | IE00BK5BQV03 | IE00B53SZB19 |
| £10,000 invested | What £10,000 in VHVG became | What £10,000 in CNX1 became |
How bumpy the ride was: VHVG vs CNX1
These head-to-head figures use only the 1,770 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Sept 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.0 years.
CNX1 swung more than VHVG: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 20.3% for CNX1, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and CNX1 on 34.7%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.
VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.
Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.79, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.7% of the 1,769 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 26 Sept 2019, when VHVG moved -19.26% and CNX1 +0.10%.
| Measure | VHVG | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.6% | 20.3% |
| Worst day | -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019 | -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +6.18% on 24 Mar 2020 | +6.26% on 2 Feb 2023 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 20.6% of days | 34.7% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -35.32% | -27.56% |
| Peak to trough | 25 Sept 2019 → 23 Mar 2020 | 22 Nov 2021 → 28 Dec 2022 |
| Back above the old peak | 13 Apr 2021 · 12 months | 19 Jul 2023 · 6 months |
Years VHVG and CNX1 parted ways
In 6 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: VHVG returned -17.91% and CNX1 +33.63%, a gap of 51.5 points. They rose together in 5 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | VHVG | CNX1 | Gap (VHVG − CNX1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +19.99% | +28.51% | -8.5 pts |
| 2023 | +17.54% | +47.71% | -30.2 pts |
| 2022 | -8.16% | -25.53% | +17.4 pts |
| 2021 | +22.64% | +29.50% | -6.9 pts |
| 2020 | +12.56% | +43.24% | -30.7 pts |
| 2019 | -17.91% | +33.63% | -51.5 pts |
How often VHVG beat CNX1 over any 12 months
Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 28.8% of them (21) and CNX1 in 71.2% (52).
£200 a month into each, 2020–2025
Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,888 in VHVG and £24,927 in CNX1, leaving CNX1 £3,039 ahead.
| Outcome | VHVG | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | £14,400 | £14,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | £21,888 | £24,927 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +£7,488 | +£10,527 |
| Gain in % | +52.00% | +73.10% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VHVG or CNX1 better?
Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VHVG and CNX1?
VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, VHVG or CNX1?
CNX1 swung more than VHVG: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 20.3% for CNX1, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and CNX1 on 34.7%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VHVG or CNX1?
VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.
How often did VHVG beat CNX1 over a 12-month period?
Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 28.8% of them (21) and CNX1 in 71.2% (52).
What would £10,000 in VHVG have become?
£10,000 invested in VHVG at the start of 2020 grew to £20,355 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.6% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring VHVG or CNX1.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.