VHVG vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VHVG turned it into
£20,355
+12.58% per year on average · 2020–2025
CNX1 turned it into
£29,324
+19.64% per year on average · 2020–2025
Difference
−£8,969
CNX1 made more of the same money

VHVG vs CNX1, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VHVG won
2
years
CNX1 won
6
years
YearVHVGCNX1Winner
2026 (so far)+14.90%+21.89%CNX1
2025+13.85%+11.83%VHVG
2024+19.99%+28.51%CNX1
2023+17.54%+47.71%CNX1
2022-8.16%-25.53%VHVG
2021+22.64%+29.50%CNX1
2020+12.56%+43.24%CNX1
2019-17.91%+33.63%CNX1
2018—+4.62%—
2017—+20.13%—
2016—+28.85%—
2015—+14.71%—
2014—+28.19%—
2013—+36.05%—
2012—+9.20%—
2011—+3.56%—
2010—-20.33%—

VHVG vs CNX1 in plain words

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VHVG vs CNX1

FactVHVGCNX1
FundVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE Developed World IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.12%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched24 Sept 201926 Jan 2010
ISINIE00BK5BQV03IE00B53SZB19
£10,000 investedWhat £10,000 in VHVG becameWhat £10,000 in CNX1 became

How bumpy the ride was: VHVG vs CNX1

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,770 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Sept 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.0 years.

CNX1 swung more than VHVG: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 20.3% for CNX1, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and CNX1 on 34.7%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.

VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.79, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.7% of the 1,769 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 26 Sept 2019, when VHVG moved -19.26% and CNX1 +0.10%.

MeasureVHVGCNX1
Annualised volatility16.6%20.3%
Worst day-19.26% on 26 Sept 2019-6.07% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+6.18% on 24 Mar 2020+6.26% on 2 Feb 2023
Days moving 1% or more20.6% of days34.7% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.32%-27.56%
Peak to trough25 Sept 2019 → 23 Mar 202022 Nov 2021 → 28 Dec 2022
Back above the old peak13 Apr 2021 · 12 months19 Jul 2023 · 6 months

Years VHVG and CNX1 parted ways

In 6 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: VHVG returned -17.91% and CNX1 +33.63%, a gap of 51.5 points. They rose together in 5 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearVHVGCNX1Gap (VHVG − CNX1)
2024+19.99%+28.51%-8.5 pts
2023+17.54%+47.71%-30.2 pts
2022-8.16%-25.53%+17.4 pts
2021+22.64%+29.50%-6.9 pts
2020+12.56%+43.24%-30.7 pts
2019-17.91%+33.63%-51.5 pts

How often VHVG beat CNX1 over any 12 months

Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 28.8% of them (21) and CNX1 in 71.2% (52).

12-month windows
73
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VHVG ahead
28.8%
21 of 73 windows
CNX1 ahead
71.2%
52 of 73 windows

£200 a month into each, 2020–2025

Putting £200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, £14,400 in total) would have grown to £21,888 in VHVG and £24,927 in CNX1, leaving CNX1 £3,039 ahead.

OutcomeVHVGCNX1
Paid in£14,400£14,400
Value at the end of 2025£21,888£24,927
Gain on the money paid in+£7,488+£10,527
Gain in %+52.00%+73.10%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VHVG or CNX1 better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VHVG and CNX1?

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, VHVG or CNX1?

CNX1 swung more than VHVG: annualised volatility of 16.6% for VHVG against 20.3% for CNX1, with VHVG moving 1% or more on 20.6% of trading days and CNX1 on 34.7%. VHVG's worst day was -19.26% on 26 Sept 2019; CNX1's was -6.07% on 12 Mar 2020.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VHVG or CNX1?

VHVG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.32% from its peak on 25 Sept 2019 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2021, 12 months after the low; CNX1 fell -27.56% from its peak on 22 Nov 2021 to a low on 28 Dec 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Jul 2023, 6 months after the low.

How often did VHVG beat CNX1 over a 12-month period?

Across the 73 rolling 12-month windows since September 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VHVG finished ahead in 28.8% of them (21) and CNX1 in 71.2% (52).

What would £10,000 in VHVG have become?

£10,000 invested in VHVG at the start of 2020 grew to £20,355 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VHVG or CNX1.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the GBP trading lines on the London Stock Exchange, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.