IUSQ (ISAC) vs VGWD: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

IUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVGWD tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index

What did the last 8 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 8 full years (2018–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

IUSQ turned it into
€23,067
+11.01% per year on average · 2018–2025
VGWD turned it into
€18,700
+8.14% per year on average · 2018–2025
Difference
+€4,367
IUSQ made more of the same money

IUSQ vs VGWD, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
10
where both funds were trading
IUSQ won
7
years
VGWD won
3
years
YearIUSQVGWDWinner
2026 (so far)+16.73%+17.20%VGWD
2025+9.02%+13.16%VGWD
2024+24.53%+15.75%IUSQ
2023+18.57%+7.29%IUSQ
2022-13.58%+0.08%VGWD
2021+29.13%+27.90%IUSQ
2020+4.94%-9.60%IUSQ
2019+30.14%+25.03%IUSQ
2018-5.97%-8.03%IUSQ
2017+9.14%+0.41%IUSQ
2016+10.88%——
2015+8.31%——
2014+19.02%——
2013+17.43%——
2012+3.09%——
20110.00%——

IUSQ vs VGWD in plain words

IUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VGWD follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IUSQ charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGWD charges 0.29% — IUSQ is the cheaper fund to hold.

IUSQ reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VGWD pays them out as cash (distributing). Across the 10 calendar years both funds were trading, IUSQ finished the year ahead 7 times and VGWD 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2018 was worth €23,067 in IUSQ versus €18,700 in VGWD by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

VHYL is the London (GBP) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B8GKDB10 — VGWD is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: IUSQ vs VGWD

FactIUSQVGWD
FundiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexFTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.29%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched21 Oct 201121 May 2013
ISINIE00B6R52259IE00B8GKDB10
WKNA1JMDFA1T8FV
Also trades asISAC—
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in IUSQ becameWhat €10,000 in VGWD became

How bumpy the ride was: IUSQ vs VGWD

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,269 trading days both funds were listed: 26 Oct 2017 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 9.0 years.

IUSQ swung more than VGWD: annualised volatility of 15.5% for IUSQ against 14.0% for VGWD, with IUSQ moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and VGWD on 15.1%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: IUSQ closed -9.24% and VGWD -9.53%.

VGWD had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.57% from its peak on 17 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Mar 2021, 11 months after the low; IUSQ fell -33.60% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.91, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.3% of the 2,268 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 15 Apr 2020, when IUSQ moved -1.61% and VGWD -4.09%.

MeasureIUSQVGWD
Annualised volatility15.5%14.0%
Worst day-9.24% on 12 Mar 2020-9.53% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+8.41% on 24 Mar 2020+8.04% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more20.5% of days15.1% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.60%-34.57%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202017 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak7 Jan 2021 · 9 months18 Mar 2021 · 11 months

Years IUSQ and VGWD parted ways

In 6 of the 9 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2020: IUSQ returned +4.94% and VGWD -9.60%, a gap of 14.5 points. They rose together in 6 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 2 years.

YearIUSQVGWDGap (IUSQ − VGWD)
2024+24.53%+15.75%+8.8 pts
2023+18.57%+7.29%+11.3 pts
2022-13.58%+0.08%-13.7 pts
2020+4.94%-9.60%+14.5 pts
2019+30.14%+25.03%+5.1 pts
2017+9.14%+0.41%+8.7 pts

How often IUSQ beat VGWD over any 12 months

Across the 96 rolling 12-month windows since October 2017, measured month-end to month-end, IUSQ finished ahead in 68.8% of them (66) and VGWD in 31.3% (30).

12-month windows
96
month-end to month-end, overlapping
IUSQ ahead
68.8%
66 of 96 windows
VGWD ahead
31.3%
30 of 96 windows

€200 a month into each, 2018–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2018 to December 2025 (96 payments, €19,200 in total) would have grown to €31,899 in IUSQ and €29,445 in VGWD, leaving IUSQ €2,454 ahead.

OutcomeIUSQVGWD
Paid in€19,200€19,200
Value at the end of 2025€31,899€29,445
Gain on the money paid in+€12,699+€10,245
Gain in %+66.14%+53.36%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is IUSQ or VGWD better?

Across the 10 calendar years both funds were trading, IUSQ finished the year ahead 7 times and VGWD 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2018 was worth €23,067 in IUSQ versus €18,700 in VGWD by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between IUSQ and VGWD?

IUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VGWD follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IUSQ charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGWD charges 0.29% — IUSQ is the cheaper fund to hold. IUSQ reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VGWD pays them out as cash (distributing).

Which is more volatile, IUSQ or VGWD?

IUSQ swung more than VGWD: annualised volatility of 15.5% for IUSQ against 14.0% for VGWD, with IUSQ moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and VGWD on 15.1%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: IUSQ closed -9.24% and VGWD -9.53%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, IUSQ or VGWD?

VGWD had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.57% from its peak on 17 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Mar 2021, 11 months after the low; IUSQ fell -33.60% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did IUSQ beat VGWD over a 12-month period?

Across the 96 rolling 12-month windows since October 2017, measured month-end to month-end, IUSQ finished ahead in 68.8% of them (66) and VGWD in 31.3% (30).

What would €10,000 in IUSQ have become?

€10,000 invested in IUSQ at the start of 2018 grew to €23,067 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.0% per year.

Is ISAC the same as IUSQ?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring IUSQ or VGWD.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.