EUNL (IWDA) vs IUSQ (ISAC): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

EUNL tracks the MSCI World IndexIUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 10 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

EUNL turned it into
€29,391
+11.38% per year on average · 2016–2025
IUSQ turned it into
€27,916
+10.81% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+€1,475
EUNL made more of the same money

EUNL vs IUSQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
16
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
11
years
IUSQ won
4
years
YearEUNLIUSQWinner
2026 (so far)+12.99%+14.29%IUSQ
2025+7.90%+9.02%IUSQ
2024+25.93%+24.53%EUNL
2023+20.13%+18.57%EUNL
2022-13.59%-13.58%Tie
2021+32.71%+29.13%EUNL
2020+5.48%+4.94%EUNL
2019+31.34%+30.14%EUNL
2018-5.13%-5.97%EUNL
2017+7.71%+9.14%IUSQ
2016+10.91%+10.88%EUNL
2015+10.81%+8.31%EUNL
2014+20.38%+19.02%EUNL
2013+21.89%+17.43%EUNL
2012+12.45%+3.09%EUNL
2011-3.26%0.00%IUSQ
2010+19.38%——
2009+4.65%——

EUNL vs IUSQ in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.20% a year in running costs.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 11 times and IUSQ 4 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €29,391 in EUNL versus €27,916 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: EUNL vs IUSQ

FactEUNLIUSQ
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksMSCI World IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200921 Oct 2011
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00B6R52259
WKNA0RPWHA1JMDF
Also trades asIWDAISAC
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in EUNL becameWhat €10,000 in IUSQ became

How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs IUSQ

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,779 trading days both funds were listed: 21 Oct 2011 to 14 Sept 2026, roughly 15.0 years.

EUNL and IUSQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 15.2% for EUNL against 14.9% for IUSQ, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and IUSQ on 20.0%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and IUSQ -9.24%.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IUSQ fell -33.60% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.98, and they closed in opposite directions on 2.9% of the 3,778 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 21 Nov 2011, when EUNL moved -2.82% and IUSQ 0.00%.

MeasureEUNLIUSQ
Annualised volatility15.2%14.9%
Worst day-9.65% on 12 Mar 2020-9.24% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+8.22% on 24 Mar 2020+8.41% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more20.5% of days20.0% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.63%-33.60%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak7 Jan 2021 · 9 months7 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years EUNL and IUSQ parted ways

In 1 of the 15 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2012: EUNL returned +12.45% and IUSQ +3.09%, a gap of 9.4 points. They rose together in 12 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearEUNLIUSQGap (EUNL − IUSQ)
2012+12.45%+3.09%+9.4 pts

How often EUNL beat IUSQ over any 12 months

Across the 167 rolling 12-month windows since October 2011, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 78.4% of them (131) and IUSQ in 21.6% (36).

12-month windows
167
month-end to month-end, overlapping
EUNL ahead
78.4%
131 of 167 windows
IUSQ ahead
21.6%
36 of 167 windows

€200 a month into each, 2012–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2012 to December 2025 (168 payments, €33,600 in total) would have grown to €84,305 in EUNL and €78,993 in IUSQ, leaving EUNL €5,312 ahead.

OutcomeEUNLIUSQ
Paid in€33,600€33,600
Value at the end of 2025€84,305€78,993
Gain on the money paid in+€50,705+€45,393
Gain in %+150.91%+135.10%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or IUSQ better?

Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 11 times and IUSQ 4 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €29,391 in EUNL versus €27,916 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and IUSQ?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.20% a year in running costs. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, EUNL or IUSQ?

EUNL and IUSQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 15.2% for EUNL against 14.9% for IUSQ, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 20.5% of trading days and IUSQ on 20.0%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and IUSQ -9.24%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or IUSQ?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IUSQ fell -33.60% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did EUNL beat IUSQ over a 12-month period?

Across the 167 rolling 12-month windows since October 2011, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 78.4% of them (131) and IUSQ in 21.6% (36).

What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?

€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2016 grew to €29,391 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.4% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Is ISAC the same as IUSQ?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or IUSQ.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 14 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC. How every number is calculated.