EUNL (IWDA) vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund B

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index

EUNL vs DEGC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
2
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
1
years
DEGC won
1
years
YearEUNLDEGCWinner
2026 (so far)+15.53%+15.71%DEGC
2025+7.90%+1.95%EUNL
2024+25.93%——
2023+20.13%——
2022-13.59%——
2021+32.71%——
2020+5.48%——
2019+31.34%——
2018-5.13%——
2017+7.71%——
2016+10.91%——
2015+10.81%——
2014+20.38%——
2013+21.89%——
2012+12.45%——
2011-3.26%——
2010+19.38%——
2009+4.65%——

EUNL vs DEGC in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and DEGC 1 times.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.

Fund facts: EUNL vs DEGC

FactEUNLDEGC
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksMSCI World IndexDimensional Global Core Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.26%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200912 Nov 2025
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE000EGGFVG6
WKNA0RPWHA41E9T
Also trades asIWDA—
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in EUNL becameWhat €10,000 in DEGC became

How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs DEGC

These head-to-head figures use only the 218 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Nov 2025 to 7 Oct 2026, 10 months.

EUNL swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 10.6% for EUNL against 9.2% for DEGC, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 15.2% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. EUNL's worst day was -1.67% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

EUNL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.50% from its peak on 15 Jan 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.94, and they closed in opposite directions on 13.4% of the 217 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 8 Apr 2026, when EUNL moved +2.52% and DEGC +1.60%.

MeasureEUNLDEGC
Annualised volatility10.6%9.2%
Worst day-1.67% on 19 Mar 2026-1.80% on 9 Mar 2026
Best day+2.52% on 8 Apr 2026+1.70% on 1 Apr 2026
Days moving 1% or more15.2% of days8.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-6.50%-5.49%
Peak to trough15 Jan 2026 → 27 Mar 20262 Mar 2026 → 27 Mar 2026
Back above the old peak16 Apr 2026 · under a month16 Apr 2026 · under a month

Years EUNL and DEGC parted ways

In the one completed calendar year both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. In 2025, EUNL returned +7.90% and DEGC +1.95%, a gap of 5.9 points. They rose together in 1 year.

YearEUNLDEGCGap (EUNL − DEGC)
2025+7.90%+1.95%+5.9 pts

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or DEGC better?

Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and DEGC 1 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and DEGC?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, EUNL or DEGC?

EUNL swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 10.6% for EUNL against 9.2% for DEGC, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 15.2% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. EUNL's worst day was -1.67% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or DEGC?

EUNL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.50% from its peak on 15 Jan 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or DEGC.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.