EUNL (IWDA) vs VGVF (VHVE): which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
EUNL
VGVF
EUNL tracks the MSCI World IndexVGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World Index
What did the last 5 years do to €10,000?
You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
EUNL vs VGVF, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | EUNL | VGVF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +15.53% | +17.03% | VGVF |
| 2025 | +7.90% | +8.99% | VGVF |
| 2024 | +25.93% | +24.73% | EUNL |
| 2023 | +20.13% | +20.35% | VGVF |
| 2022 | -13.59% | -13.58% | Tie |
| 2021 | +32.71% | +31.62% | EUNL |
| 2020 | +5.48% | +2.32% | EUNL |
| 2019 | +31.34% | — | — |
| 2018 | -5.13% | — | — |
| 2017 | +7.71% | — | — |
| 2016 | +10.91% | — | — |
| 2015 | +10.81% | — | — |
| 2014 | +20.38% | — | — |
| 2013 | +21.89% | — | — |
| 2012 | +12.45% | — | — |
| 2011 | -3.26% | — | — |
| 2010 | +19.38% | — | — |
| 2009 | +4.65% | — | — |
EUNL vs VGVF in plain words
EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 3 times and VGVF 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,719 in EUNL versus €18,610 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.
VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.
Fund facts: EUNL vs VGVF
| Fact | EUNL | VGVF |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc) | Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | MSCI World Index | FTSE Developed World Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 25 Sept 2009 | 24 Sept 2019 |
| ISIN | IE00B4L5Y983 | IE00BK5BQV03 |
| WKN | A0RPWH | A2PLS9 |
| Also trades as | IWDA | VHVE |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in EUNL became | What €10,000 in VGVF became |
How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs VGVF
These head-to-head figures use only the 1,697 trading days both funds were listed: 5 Feb 2020 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 6.7 years.
EUNL and VGVF swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.4% for EUNL against 16.0% for VGVF, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.4% of trading days and VGVF on 21.3%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; VGVF fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.98, and they closed in opposite directions on 3.7% of the 1,696 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 12 Mar 2020, when EUNL moved -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.
| Measure | EUNL | VGVF |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.4% | 16.0% |
| Worst day | -9.65% on 12 Mar 2020 | -6.71% on 12 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +8.22% on 24 Mar 2020 | +8.33% on 24 Mar 2020 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 21.4% of days | 21.3% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.63% | -33.14% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 13 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 7 Jan 2021 · 9 months | 6 Jan 2021 · 9 months |
Years EUNL and VGVF parted ways
In none of the 6 completed calendar years both funds were trading did the two returns end more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2020: EUNL returned +5.48% and VGVF +2.32%, a gap of 3.2 points. They rose together in 5 years and fell together in 1 year.
How often EUNL beat VGVF over any 12 months
Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 51.5% of them (35) and VGVF in 48.5% (33).
€200 a month into each, 2021–2025
Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2021 to December 2025 (60 payments, €12,000 in total) would have grown to €16,695 in EUNL and €16,724 in VGVF, leaving VGVF €29 ahead.
| Outcome | EUNL | VGVF |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | €12,000 | €12,000 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | €16,695 | €16,724 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +€4,695 | +€4,724 |
| Gain in % | +39.12% | +39.37% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is EUNL or VGVF better?
Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 3 times and VGVF 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,719 in EUNL versus €18,610 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between EUNL and VGVF?
EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, EUNL or VGVF?
EUNL and VGVF swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.4% for EUNL against 16.0% for VGVF, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.4% of trading days and VGVF on 21.3%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or VGVF?
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; VGVF fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.
How often did EUNL beat VGVF over a 12-month period?
Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 51.5% of them (35) and VGVF in 48.5% (33).
What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?
€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2021 grew to €18,719 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.4% per year.
Is IWDA the same as EUNL?
IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.
Is VHVE the same as VGVF?
VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or VGVF.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.