EUNL (IWDA) vs VGVF (VHVE): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

EUNL tracks the MSCI World IndexVGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World Index

What did the last 5 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

EUNL turned it into
€18,719
+13.36% per year on average · 2021–2025
VGVF turned it into
€18,610
+13.23% per year on average · 2021–2025
Difference
+€109
EUNL made more of the same money

EUNL vs VGVF, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
3
years
VGVF won
3
years
YearEUNLVGVFWinner
2026 (so far)+15.53%+17.03%VGVF
2025+7.90%+8.99%VGVF
2024+25.93%+24.73%EUNL
2023+20.13%+20.35%VGVF
2022-13.59%-13.58%Tie
2021+32.71%+31.62%EUNL
2020+5.48%+2.32%EUNL
2019+31.34%——
2018-5.13%——
2017+7.71%——
2016+10.91%——
2015+10.81%——
2014+20.38%——
2013+21.89%——
2012+12.45%——
2011-3.26%——
2010+19.38%——
2009+4.65%——

EUNL vs VGVF in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 3 times and VGVF 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,719 in EUNL versus €18,610 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: EUNL vs VGVF

FactEUNLVGVF
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI World IndexFTSE Developed World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.12%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200924 Sept 2019
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00BK5BQV03
WKNA0RPWHA2PLS9
Also trades asIWDAVHVE
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in EUNL becameWhat €10,000 in VGVF became

How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs VGVF

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,697 trading days both funds were listed: 5 Feb 2020 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 6.7 years.

EUNL and VGVF swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.4% for EUNL against 16.0% for VGVF, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.4% of trading days and VGVF on 21.3%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; VGVF fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.98, and they closed in opposite directions on 3.7% of the 1,696 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 12 Mar 2020, when EUNL moved -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.

MeasureEUNLVGVF
Annualised volatility16.4%16.0%
Worst day-9.65% on 12 Mar 2020-6.71% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+8.22% on 24 Mar 2020+8.33% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more21.4% of days21.3% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.63%-33.14%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202013 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak7 Jan 2021 · 9 months6 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years EUNL and VGVF parted ways

In none of the 6 completed calendar years both funds were trading did the two returns end more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2020: EUNL returned +5.48% and VGVF +2.32%, a gap of 3.2 points. They rose together in 5 years and fell together in 1 year.

How often EUNL beat VGVF over any 12 months

Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 51.5% of them (35) and VGVF in 48.5% (33).

12-month windows
68
month-end to month-end, overlapping
EUNL ahead
51.5%
35 of 68 windows
VGVF ahead
48.5%
33 of 68 windows

€200 a month into each, 2021–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2021 to December 2025 (60 payments, €12,000 in total) would have grown to €16,695 in EUNL and €16,724 in VGVF, leaving VGVF €29 ahead.

OutcomeEUNLVGVF
Paid in€12,000€12,000
Value at the end of 2025€16,695€16,724
Gain on the money paid in+€4,695+€4,724
Gain in %+39.12%+39.37%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or VGVF better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 3 times and VGVF 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,719 in EUNL versus €18,610 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and VGVF?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, EUNL or VGVF?

EUNL and VGVF swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.4% for EUNL against 16.0% for VGVF, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.4% of trading days and VGVF on 21.3%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: EUNL closed -9.65% and VGVF -6.71%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or VGVF?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; VGVF fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did EUNL beat VGVF over a 12-month period?

Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 51.5% of them (35) and VGVF in 48.5% (33).

What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?

€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2021 grew to €18,719 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.4% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Is VHVE the same as VGVF?

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or VGVF.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.