VGVF (VHVE) vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 5 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VGVF turned it into
€18,610
+13.23% per year on average · 2021–2025
IS3Q turned it into
€17,711
+12.11% per year on average · 2021–2025
Difference
+€899
VGVF made more of the same money

VGVF vs IS3Q, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
VGVF won
4
years
IS3Q won
3
years
YearVGVFIS3QWinner
2026 (so far)+17.03%+15.60%VGVF
2025+8.99%+2.80%VGVF
2024+24.73%+23.78%VGVF
2023+20.35%+21.70%IS3Q
2022-13.58%-14.84%VGVF
2021+31.62%+34.28%IS3Q
2020+2.32%+4.44%IS3Q
2019—+33.90%—
2018—-3.45%—
2017—+8.34%—
2016—+7.85%—
2015—+14.52%—
2014—-14.79%—

VGVF vs IS3Q in plain words

VGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGVF charges 0.12% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, VGVF finished the year ahead 4 times and IS3Q 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,610 in VGVF versus €17,711 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: VGVF vs IS3Q

FactVGVFIS3Q
FundVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF
TracksFTSE Developed World IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.12%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched24 Sept 20193 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BK5BQV03IE00BP3QZ601
WKNA2PLS9A12ATE
Also trades asVHVEIWQU
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in VGVF becameWhat €10,000 in IS3Q became

How bumpy the ride was: VGVF vs IS3Q

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,697 trading days both funds were listed: 5 Feb 2020 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 6.7 years.

VGVF and IS3Q swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.0% for VGVF against 16.1% for IS3Q, with VGVF moving 1% or more on 21.3% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.5%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VGVF closed -6.71% and IS3Q -8.05%.

VGVF had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.97, and they closed in opposite directions on 8.5% of the 1,696 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 13 Mar 2020, when VGVF moved -0.45% and IS3Q +1.37%.

MeasureVGVFIS3Q
Annualised volatility16.0%16.1%
Worst day-6.71% on 12 Mar 2020-8.05% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+8.33% on 24 Mar 2020+7.77% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more21.3% of days20.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.14%-32.31%
Peak to trough13 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak6 Jan 2021 · 9 months20 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years VGVF and IS3Q parted ways

In 1 of the 6 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2025: VGVF returned +8.99% and IS3Q +2.80%, a gap of 6.2 points. They rose together in 5 years and fell together in 1 year.

YearVGVFIS3QGap (VGVF − IS3Q)
2025+8.99%+2.80%+6.2 pts

How often VGVF beat IS3Q over any 12 months

Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, VGVF finished ahead in 60.3% of them (41) and IS3Q in 39.7% (27).

12-month windows
68
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VGVF ahead
60.3%
41 of 68 windows
IS3Q ahead
39.7%
27 of 68 windows

€200 a month into each, 2021–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2021 to December 2025 (60 payments, €12,000 in total) would have grown to €16,724 in VGVF and €15,857 in IS3Q, leaving VGVF €867 ahead.

OutcomeVGVFIS3Q
Paid in€12,000€12,000
Value at the end of 2025€16,724€15,857
Gain on the money paid in+€4,724+€3,857
Gain in %+39.37%+32.14%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VGVF or IS3Q better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, VGVF finished the year ahead 4 times and IS3Q 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth €18,610 in VGVF versus €17,711 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VGVF and IS3Q?

VGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGVF charges 0.12% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — VGVF is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, VGVF or IS3Q?

VGVF and IS3Q swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.0% for VGVF against 16.1% for IS3Q, with VGVF moving 1% or more on 21.3% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.5%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VGVF closed -6.71% and IS3Q -8.05%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VGVF or IS3Q?

VGVF had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.14% from its peak on 13 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did VGVF beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?

Across the 68 rolling 12-month windows since February 2020, measured month-end to month-end, VGVF finished ahead in 60.3% of them (41) and IS3Q in 39.7% (27).

What would €10,000 in VGVF have become?

€10,000 invested in VGVF at the start of 2021 grew to €18,610 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.2% per year.

Is VHVE the same as VGVF?

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VGVF or IS3Q.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.