SXR8 (CSPX) vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SXR8
IS3Q
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
What did the last 10 years do to €10,000?
You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SXR8 vs IS3Q, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SXR8 | IS3Q | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +16.46% | +15.60% | SXR8 |
| 2025 | +4.73% | +2.80% | SXR8 |
| 2024 | +32.32% | +23.78% | SXR8 |
| 2023 | +22.47% | +21.70% | SXR8 |
| 2022 | -14.31% | -14.84% | SXR8 |
| 2021 | +40.74% | +34.28% | SXR8 |
| 2020 | +6.80% | +4.44% | SXR8 |
| 2019 | +34.49% | +33.90% | SXR8 |
| 2018 | -1.05% | -3.45% | SXR8 |
| 2017 | +6.67% | +8.34% | IS3Q |
| 2016 | +14.83% | +7.85% | SXR8 |
| 2015 | +12.52% | +14.52% | IS3Q |
| 2014 | +30.38% | -14.79% | SXR8 |
| 2013 | +27.45% | — | — |
| 2012 | +11.05% | — | — |
| 2011 | +4.85% | — | — |
| 2010 | -12.49% | — | — |
SXR8 vs IS3Q in plain words
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXR8 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — SXR8 is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 11 times and IS3Q 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €35,638 in SXR8 versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.
IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.
Fund facts: SXR8 vs IS3Q
| Fact | SXR8 | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.25% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 19 May 2010 | 3 Oct 2014 |
| ISIN | IE00B5BMR087 | IE00BP3QZ601 |
| WKN | A0YEDG | A12ATE |
| Also trades as | CSPX | IWQU |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in SXR8 became | What €10,000 in IS3Q became |
How bumpy the ride was: SXR8 vs IS3Q
These head-to-head figures use only the 3,042 trading days both funds were listed: 6 Oct 2014 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 12.1 years.
IS3Q swung more than SXR8: annualised volatility of 16.8% for SXR8 against 20.3% for IS3Q, with SXR8 moving 1% or more on 24.2% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. SXR8's worst day was -8.03% on 12 Mar 2020; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.
SXR8 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.78% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.
Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.77, and they closed in opposite directions on 7.8% of the 3,041 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 30 Oct 2014, when SXR8 moved +1.41% and IS3Q +28.14%.
| Measure | SXR8 | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.8% | 20.3% |
| Worst day | -8.03% on 12 Mar 2020 | -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014 |
| Best day | +8.55% on 24 Mar 2020 | +28.14% on 30 Oct 2014 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 24.2% of days | 20.9% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.78% | -32.31% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 8 Jan 2021 · 9 months | 20 Jan 2021 · 9 months |
Years SXR8 and IS3Q parted ways
In 4 of the 12 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2014: SXR8 returned +30.38% and IS3Q -14.79%, a gap of 45.2 points. They rose together in 9 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | SXR8 | IS3Q | Gap (SXR8 − IS3Q) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +32.32% | +23.78% | +8.5 pts |
| 2021 | +40.74% | +34.28% | +6.5 pts |
| 2016 | +14.83% | +7.85% | +7.0 pts |
| 2014 | +30.38% | -14.79% | +45.2 pts |
How often SXR8 beat IS3Q over any 12 months
Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, SXR8 finished ahead in 77.3% of them (102) and IS3Q in 22.7% (30).
€200 a month into each, 2015–2025
Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2015 to December 2025 (132 payments, €26,400 in total) would have grown to €60,059 in SXR8 and €50,948 in IS3Q, leaving SXR8 €9,111 ahead.
| Outcome | SXR8 | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | €26,400 | €26,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | €60,059 | €50,948 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +€33,659 | +€24,548 |
| Gain in % | +127.50% | +92.98% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SXR8 or IS3Q better?
Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 11 times and IS3Q 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €35,638 in SXR8 versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SXR8 and IS3Q?
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXR8 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — SXR8 is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SXR8 or IS3Q?
IS3Q swung more than SXR8: annualised volatility of 16.8% for SXR8 against 20.3% for IS3Q, with SXR8 moving 1% or more on 24.2% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. SXR8's worst day was -8.03% on 12 Mar 2020; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SXR8 or IS3Q?
SXR8 had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.78% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.
How often did SXR8 beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?
Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, SXR8 finished ahead in 77.3% of them (102) and IS3Q in 22.7% (30).
What would €10,000 in SXR8 have become?
€10,000 invested in SXR8 at the start of 2016 grew to €35,638 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.6% per year.
Is CSPX the same as SXR8?
CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.
Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?
IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SXR8 or IS3Q.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.