SXR8 (CSPX) vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SXR8tracks the S&P 500 Index
DimensionalDEGCtracks the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index
SXR8 vs DEGC, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SXR8 | DEGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.04% | +12.65% | DEGC |
| 2025 | +4.73% | +1.95% | SXR8 |
| 2024 | +32.32% | — | — |
| 2023 | +22.47% | — | — |
| 2022 | -14.31% | — | — |
| 2021 | +40.74% | — | — |
| 2020 | +6.80% | — | — |
| 2019 | +34.49% | — | — |
| 2018 | -1.05% | — | — |
| 2017 | +6.67% | — | — |
| 2016 | +14.83% | — | — |
| 2015 | +12.52% | — | — |
| 2014 | +30.38% | — | — |
| 2013 | +27.45% | — | — |
| 2012 | +11.05% | — | — |
| 2011 | +4.85% | — | — |
| 2010 | -12.49% | — | — |
SXR8 vs DEGC in plain words
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXR8 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — SXR8 is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 1 times and DEGC 1 times.
CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.
Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.
Fund facts: SXR8 vs DEGC
| Fact | SXR8 | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.26% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 19 May 2010 | 12 Nov 2025 |
| ISIN | IE00B5BMR087 | IE000EGGFVG6 |
| WKN | A0YEDG | A41E9T |
| Also trades as | CSPX | — |
Frequently asked
Is SXR8 or DEGC better?
Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 1 times and DEGC 1 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SXR8 and DEGC?
SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXR8 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — SXR8 is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Is CSPX the same as SXR8?
CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SXR8 or DEGC.