WEBN vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
WEBNtracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
DimensionalDEGCtracks the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
WEBN vs DEGC, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | WEBN | DEGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +13.37% | +12.65% | WEBN |
| 2025 | +9.70% | +1.95% | WEBN |
| 2024 | +6.17% | — | — |
WEBN vs DEGC in plain words
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.
Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.
Fund facts: WEBN vs DEGC
| Fact | WEBN | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) | Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) |
| Tracks | Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.26% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 5 Jun 2024 | 12 Nov 2025 |
| ISIN | IE0003XJA0J9 | IE000EGGFVG6 |
| WKN | ETF151 | A41E9T |
Frequently asked
Is WEBN or DEGC better?
Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between WEBN and DEGC?
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or DEGC.