WEBN vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Fund B

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

WEBN vs DEGC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
2
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
2
years
DEGC won
0
years
YearWEBNDEGCWinner
2026 (so far)+16.52%+15.71%WEBN
2025+9.70%+1.95%WEBN
2024+6.17%——

WEBN vs DEGC in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.

Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.

Fund facts: WEBN vs DEGC

FactWEBNDEGC
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexDimensional Global Core Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.26%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202412 Nov 2025
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE000EGGFVG6
WKNETF151A41E9T
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in WEBN becameWhat €10,000 in DEGC became

How bumpy the ride was: WEBN vs DEGC

These head-to-head figures use only the 218 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Nov 2025 to 7 Oct 2026, 10 months.

WEBN swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 11.5% for WEBN against 9.2% for DEGC, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 19.8% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. WEBN's worst day was -1.79% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.63% from its peak on 25 Feb 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.87, and they closed in opposite directions on 16.1% of the 217 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 8 Apr 2026, when WEBN moved +2.91% and DEGC +1.60%.

MeasureWEBNDEGC
Annualised volatility11.5%9.2%
Worst day-1.79% on 19 Mar 2026-1.80% on 9 Mar 2026
Best day+2.91% on 8 Apr 2026+1.70% on 1 Apr 2026
Days moving 1% or more19.8% of days8.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-6.63%-5.49%
Peak to trough25 Feb 2026 → 27 Mar 20262 Mar 2026 → 27 Mar 2026
Back above the old peak16 Apr 2026 · under a month16 Apr 2026 · under a month

Years WEBN and DEGC parted ways

In the one completed calendar year both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. In 2025, WEBN returned +9.70% and DEGC +1.95%, a gap of 7.8 points. They rose together in 1 year.

YearWEBNDEGCGap (WEBN − DEGC)
2025+9.70%+1.95%+7.8 pts

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or DEGC better?

Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and DEGC?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, WEBN or DEGC?

WEBN swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 11.5% for WEBN against 9.2% for DEGC, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 19.8% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. WEBN's worst day was -1.79% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

Which had the deeper drawdown, WEBN or DEGC?

WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.63% from its peak on 25 Feb 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or DEGC.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.