WEBN vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
WEBN
DimensionalDEGC
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
WEBN vs DEGC, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | WEBN | DEGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +16.52% | +15.71% | WEBN |
| 2025 | +9.70% | +1.95% | WEBN |
| 2024 | +6.17% | — | — |
WEBN vs DEGC in plain words
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.
Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.
Fund facts: WEBN vs DEGC
| Fact | WEBN | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) | Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) |
| Tracks | Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.26% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 5 Jun 2024 | 12 Nov 2025 |
| ISIN | IE0003XJA0J9 | IE000EGGFVG6 |
| WKN | ETF151 | A41E9T |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in WEBN became | What €10,000 in DEGC became |
How bumpy the ride was: WEBN vs DEGC
These head-to-head figures use only the 218 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Nov 2025 to 7 Oct 2026, 10 months.
WEBN swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 11.5% for WEBN against 9.2% for DEGC, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 19.8% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. WEBN's worst day was -1.79% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.
WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.63% from its peak on 25 Feb 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.87, and they closed in opposite directions on 16.1% of the 217 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 8 Apr 2026, when WEBN moved +2.91% and DEGC +1.60%.
| Measure | WEBN | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 11.5% | 9.2% |
| Worst day | -1.79% on 19 Mar 2026 | -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026 |
| Best day | +2.91% on 8 Apr 2026 | +1.70% on 1 Apr 2026 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 19.8% of days | 8.8% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -6.63% | -5.49% |
| Peak to trough | 25 Feb 2026 → 27 Mar 2026 | 2 Mar 2026 → 27 Mar 2026 |
| Back above the old peak | 16 Apr 2026 · under a month | 16 Apr 2026 · under a month |
Years WEBN and DEGC parted ways
In the one completed calendar year both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. In 2025, WEBN returned +9.70% and DEGC +1.95%, a gap of 7.8 points. They rose together in 1 year.
| Year | WEBN | DEGC | Gap (WEBN − DEGC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +9.70% | +1.95% | +7.8 pts |
Frequently asked
Is WEBN or DEGC better?
Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between WEBN and DEGC?
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, WEBN or DEGC?
WEBN swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 11.5% for WEBN against 9.2% for DEGC, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 19.8% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. WEBN's worst day was -1.79% on 19 Mar 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.
Which had the deeper drawdown, WEBN or DEGC?
WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -6.63% from its peak on 25 Feb 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or DEGC.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.