WEBN vs IUSQ (ISAC): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
IUSQ turned it into
€10,902
+9.02% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
+€69
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs IUSQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
IUSQ won
2
years
YearWEBNIUSQWinner
2026 (so far)+16.52%+16.73%IUSQ
2025+9.70%+9.02%WEBN
2024+6.17%+24.53%IUSQ
2023—+18.57%—
2022—-13.58%—
2021—+29.13%—
2020—+4.94%—
2019—+30.14%—
2018—-5.97%—
2017—+9.14%—
2016—+10.88%—
2015—+8.31%—
2014—+19.02%—
2013—+17.43%—
2012—+3.09%—
2011—0.00%—

WEBN vs IUSQ in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IUSQ charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IUSQ 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,902 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs IUSQ

FactWEBNIUSQ
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202421 Oct 2011
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B6R52259
WKNETF151A1JMDF
Also trades as—ISAC
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in WEBN becameWhat €10,000 in IUSQ became

How bumpy the ride was: WEBN vs IUSQ

These head-to-head figures use only the 564 trading days both funds were listed: 15 Jul 2024 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.2 years.

WEBN and IUSQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 14.4% for IUSQ, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IUSQ on 20.1%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; IUSQ's was -4.75% on 3 Apr 2025.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low; IUSQ fell -21.25% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 1 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.97, and they closed in opposite directions on 5.3% of the 563 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 13 Mar 2025, when WEBN moved +0.76% and IUSQ -0.58%.

MeasureWEBNIUSQ
Annualised volatility14.5%14.4%
Worst day-4.84% on 9 Apr 2025-4.75% on 3 Apr 2025
Best day+3.90% on 10 Apr 2025+3.93% on 10 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more20.4% of days20.1% of days
Deepest drawdown-21.22%-21.25%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 202519 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025
Back above the old peak19 Sept 2025 · 5 months1 Oct 2025 · 5 months

Years WEBN and IUSQ parted ways

In 1 of the 2 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: WEBN returned +6.17% and IUSQ +24.53%, a gap of 18.4 points. They rose together in 2 years.

YearWEBNIUSQGap (WEBN − IUSQ)
2024+6.17%+24.53%-18.4 pts

How often WEBN beat IUSQ over any 12 months

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 80.0% of them (12) and IUSQ in 20.0% (3).

12-month windows
15
month-end to month-end, overlapping
WEBN ahead
80.0%
12 of 15 windows
IUSQ ahead
20.0%
3 of 15 windows

€200 a month into each, 2025–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,613 in WEBN and €2,602 in IUSQ, leaving WEBN €11 ahead.

OutcomeWEBNIUSQ
Paid in€2,400€2,400
Value at the end of 2025€2,613€2,602
Gain on the money paid in+€213+€202
Gain in %+8.86%+8.41%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or IUSQ better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IUSQ 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,902 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and IUSQ?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IUSQ charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, WEBN or IUSQ?

WEBN and IUSQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 14.4% for IUSQ, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IUSQ on 20.1%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; IUSQ's was -4.75% on 3 Apr 2025.

Which had the deeper drawdown, WEBN or IUSQ?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low; IUSQ fell -21.25% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 1 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.

How often did WEBN beat IUSQ over a 12-month period?

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 80.0% of them (12) and IUSQ in 20.0% (3).

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is ISAC the same as IUSQ?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IUSQ.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.