SPYL vs WEBN: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund B

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 IndexWEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SPYL turned it into
€10,471
+4.71% per year on average · 2025–2025
WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€499
WEBN made more of the same money

SPYL vs WEBN, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
SPYL won
1
years
WEBN won
2
years
YearSPYLWEBNWinner
2026 (so far)+16.47%+16.52%WEBN
2025+4.71%+9.70%WEBN
2024+32.33%+6.17%SPYL
2023+8.23%——

SPYL vs WEBN in plain words

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,471 in SPYL versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

SPYL also trades in USD on the London Stock Exchange, where SPXL is its GBP line, ISIN IE000XZSV718 — this page follows its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: SPYL vs WEBN

FactSPYLWEBN
FundSPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc)Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.07%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched31 Oct 20235 Jun 2024
ISINIE000XZSV718IE0003XJA0J9
WKNA3EUC1ETF151
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in SPYL becameWhat €10,000 in WEBN became

How bumpy the ride was: SPYL vs WEBN

These head-to-head figures use only the 564 trading days both funds were listed: 15 Jul 2024 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.2 years.

SPYL swung more than WEBN: annualised volatility of 15.5% for SPYL against 14.5% for WEBN, with SPYL moving 1% or more on 20.8% of trading days and WEBN on 20.4%. SPYL's worst day was -5.54% on 3 Apr 2025; WEBN's was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025.

SPYL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -23.27% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Oct 2025, 6 months after the low; WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.94, and they closed in opposite directions on 9.9% of the 563 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 13 Mar 2025, when SPYL moved -0.88% and WEBN +0.76%.

MeasureSPYLWEBN
Annualised volatility15.5%14.5%
Worst day-5.54% on 3 Apr 2025-4.84% on 9 Apr 2025
Best day+4.12% on 6 Nov 2024+3.90% on 10 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more20.8% of days20.4% of days
Deepest drawdown-23.27%-21.22%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 202519 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025
Back above the old peak27 Oct 2025 · 6 months19 Sept 2025 · 5 months

Years SPYL and WEBN parted ways

In 1 of the 2 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: SPYL returned +32.33% and WEBN +6.17%, a gap of 26.2 points. They rose together in 2 years.

YearSPYLWEBNGap (SPYL − WEBN)
2024+32.33%+6.17%+26.2 pts

How often SPYL beat WEBN over any 12 months

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, SPYL finished ahead in 6.7% of them (1) and WEBN in 93.3% (14).

12-month windows
15
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SPYL ahead
6.7%
1 of 15 windows
WEBN ahead
93.3%
14 of 15 windows

€200 a month into each, 2025–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,576 in SPYL and €2,613 in WEBN, leaving WEBN €37 ahead.

OutcomeSPYLWEBN
Paid in€2,400€2,400
Value at the end of 2025€2,576€2,613
Gain on the money paid in+€176+€213
Gain in %+7.31%+8.86%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SPYL or WEBN better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,471 in SPYL versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SPYL and WEBN?

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, SPYL or WEBN?

SPYL swung more than WEBN: annualised volatility of 15.5% for SPYL against 14.5% for WEBN, with SPYL moving 1% or more on 20.8% of trading days and WEBN on 20.4%. SPYL's worst day was -5.54% on 3 Apr 2025; WEBN's was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SPYL or WEBN?

SPYL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -23.27% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Oct 2025, 6 months after the low; WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low.

How often did SPYL beat WEBN over a 12-month period?

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, SPYL finished ahead in 6.7% of them (1) and WEBN in 93.3% (14).

What would €10,000 in SPYL have become?

€10,000 invested in SPYL at the start of 2025 grew to €10,471 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 4.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SPYL or WEBN.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.