SPYL vs EUNL (IWDA): which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SPYL
EUNL
SPYL tracks the S&P 500 IndexEUNL tracks the MSCI World Index
What did the last 2 years do to €10,000?
You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 2 full years (2024–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
SPYL vs EUNL, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SPYL | EUNL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +16.47% | +15.53% | SPYL |
| 2025 | +4.71% | +7.90% | EUNL |
| 2024 | +32.33% | +25.93% | SPYL |
| 2023 | +8.23% | +20.13% | EUNL |
| 2022 | — | -13.59% | — |
| 2021 | — | +32.71% | — |
| 2020 | — | +5.48% | — |
| 2019 | — | +31.34% | — |
| 2018 | — | -5.13% | — |
| 2017 | — | +7.71% | — |
| 2016 | — | +10.91% | — |
| 2015 | — | +10.81% | — |
| 2014 | — | +20.38% | — |
| 2013 | — | +21.89% | — |
| 2012 | — | +12.45% | — |
| 2011 | — | -3.26% | — |
| 2010 | — | +19.38% | — |
| 2009 | — | +4.65% | — |
SPYL vs EUNL in plain words
SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while EUNL follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and EUNL charges 0.20% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 4 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 2 times and EUNL 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2024 was worth €13,856 in SPYL versus €13,588 in EUNL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
SPYL also trades in USD on the London Stock Exchange, where SPXL is its GBP line, ISIN IE000XZSV718 — this page follows its EUR line on Xetra.
IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.
Fund facts: SPYL vs EUNL
| Fact | SPYL | EUNL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc) | iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI World Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.20% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 31 Oct 2023 | 25 Sept 2009 |
| ISIN | IE000XZSV718 | IE00B4L5Y983 |
| WKN | A3EUC1 | A0RPWH |
| Also trades as | — | IWDA |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in SPYL became | What €10,000 in EUNL became |
How bumpy the ride was: SPYL vs EUNL
These head-to-head figures use only the 696 trading days both funds were listed: 2 Nov 2023 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.8 years.
SPYL swung more than EUNL: annualised volatility of 14.6% for SPYL against 13.5% for EUNL, with SPYL moving 1% or more on 18.7% of trading days and EUNL on 16.1%. Both had their worst day on 3 Apr 2025: SPYL closed -5.54% and EUNL -4.92%.
SPYL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -23.27% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Oct 2025, 6 months after the low; EUNL fell -21.73% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 3 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.98, and they closed in opposite directions on 6.3% of the 695 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 6 Nov 2024, when SPYL moved +4.12% and EUNL +3.13%.
| Measure | SPYL | EUNL |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 14.6% | 13.5% |
| Worst day | -5.54% on 3 Apr 2025 | -4.92% on 3 Apr 2025 |
| Best day | +4.12% on 6 Nov 2024 | +4.05% on 10 Apr 2025 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 18.7% of days | 16.1% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -23.27% | -21.73% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025 | 19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025 |
| Back above the old peak | 27 Oct 2025 · 6 months | 3 Oct 2025 · 5 months |
Years SPYL and EUNL parted ways
In 2 of the 3 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: SPYL returned +8.23% and EUNL +20.13%, a gap of 11.9 points. They rose together in 3 years.
| Year | SPYL | EUNL | Gap (SPYL − EUNL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +32.33% | +25.93% | +6.4 pts |
| 2023 | +8.23% | +20.13% | -11.9 pts |
How often SPYL beat EUNL over any 12 months
Across the 16 rolling 12-month windows since November 2023, measured month-end to month-end, SPYL finished ahead in 43.8% of them (7) and EUNL in 56.3% (9).
€200 a month into each, 2025–2025
Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,576 in SPYL and €2,588 in EUNL, leaving EUNL €12 ahead.
| Outcome | SPYL | EUNL |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | €2,400 | €2,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | €2,576 | €2,588 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +€176 | +€188 |
| Gain in % | +7.31% | +7.82% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SPYL or EUNL better?
Across the 4 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 2 times and EUNL 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2024 was worth €13,856 in SPYL versus €13,588 in EUNL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SPYL and EUNL?
SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while EUNL follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and EUNL charges 0.20% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SPYL or EUNL?
SPYL swung more than EUNL: annualised volatility of 14.6% for SPYL against 13.5% for EUNL, with SPYL moving 1% or more on 18.7% of trading days and EUNL on 16.1%. Both had their worst day on 3 Apr 2025: SPYL closed -5.54% and EUNL -4.92%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SPYL or EUNL?
SPYL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -23.27% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Oct 2025, 6 months after the low; EUNL fell -21.73% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 3 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.
How often did SPYL beat EUNL over a 12-month period?
Across the 16 rolling 12-month windows since November 2023, measured month-end to month-end, SPYL finished ahead in 43.8% of them (7) and EUNL in 56.3% (9).
What would €10,000 in SPYL have become?
€10,000 invested in SPYL at the start of 2024 grew to €13,856 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.7% per year.
Is IWDA the same as EUNL?
IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SPYL or EUNL.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.