EUNL (IWDA) vs AVWC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

EUNL turned it into
€10,790
+7.90% per year on average · 20252025
AVWC turned it into
€10,908
+9.08% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
−€118
AVWC made more of the same money

EUNL vs AVWC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
1
years
AVWC won
2
years
YearEUNLAVWCWinner
2026 (so far)+11.86%+16.36%AVWC
2025+7.90%+9.08%AVWC
2024+25.93%+2.94%EUNL
2023+20.13%
2022-13.59%
2021+32.71%
2020+5.48%
2019+31.34%
2018-5.13%
2017+7.71%
2016+10.91%
2015+10.81%
2014+20.38%
2013+21.89%
2012+12.45%
2011-3.26%
2010+19.38%
2009+4.65%

EUNL vs AVWC in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and AVWC 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,790 in EUNL versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it tilts a broad developed-market portfolio towards cheaper, more profitable and smaller companies rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World IMI.

Fund facts: EUNL vs AVWC

FactEUNLAVWC
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
TracksMSCI World IndexAvantis Global Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.22%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200925 Sept 2024
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE000RJECXS5
WKNA0RPWHA40GB8
Also trades asIWDA

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or AVWC better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and AVWC 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,790 in EUNL versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and AVWC?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?

€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2025 grew to €10,790 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 7.9% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or AVWC.