EUNL (IWDA) vs AVWC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

EUNL turned it into
€10,790
+7.90% per year on average · 2025–2025
AVWC turned it into
€10,908
+9.08% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€118
AVWC made more of the same money

EUNL vs AVWC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
1
years
AVWC won
2
years
YearEUNLAVWCWinner
2026 (so far)+15.53%+18.31%AVWC
2025+7.90%+9.08%AVWC
2024+25.93%+2.94%EUNL
2023+20.13%——
2022-13.59%——
2021+32.71%——
2020+5.48%——
2019+31.34%——
2018-5.13%——
2017+7.71%——
2016+10.91%——
2015+10.81%——
2014+20.38%——
2013+21.89%——
2012+12.45%——
2011-3.26%——
2010+19.38%——
2009+4.65%——

EUNL vs AVWC in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and AVWC 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,790 in EUNL versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it tilts a broad developed-market portfolio towards cheaper, more profitable and smaller companies rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World IMI.

Fund facts: EUNL vs AVWC

FactEUNLAVWC
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
TracksMSCI World IndexAvantis Global Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.22%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200925 Sept 2024
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE000RJECXS5
WKNA0RPWHA40GB8
Also trades asIWDA—
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in EUNL becameWhat €10,000 in AVWC became

How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs AVWC

These head-to-head figures use only the 499 trading days both funds were listed: 14 Oct 2024 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.0 years.

EUNL and AVWC swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.3% for EUNL against 14.3% for AVWC, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 18.3% of trading days and AVWC on 16.3%. Both had their worst day on 3 Apr 2025: EUNL closed -4.92% and AVWC -5.26%.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -21.73% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 3 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low; AVWC fell -21.65% from its peak on 18 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.97, and they closed in opposite directions on 10.0% of the 498 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 25 Nov 2024, when EUNL moved -0.24% and AVWC +0.62%.

MeasureEUNLAVWC
Annualised volatility14.3%14.3%
Worst day-4.92% on 3 Apr 2025-5.26% on 3 Apr 2025
Best day+4.05% on 10 Apr 2025+3.79% on 10 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more18.3% of days16.3% of days
Deepest drawdown-21.73%-21.65%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 202518 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025
Back above the old peak3 Oct 2025 · 5 months6 Oct 2025 · 5 months

Years EUNL and AVWC parted ways

In 1 of the 2 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: EUNL returned +25.93% and AVWC +2.94%, a gap of 23.0 points. They rose together in 2 years.

YearEUNLAVWCGap (EUNL − AVWC)
2024+25.93%+2.94%+23.0 pts

How often EUNL beat AVWC over any 12 months

Across the 12 rolling 12-month windows since October 2024, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 16.7% of them (2) and AVWC in 83.3% (10).

12-month windows
12
month-end to month-end, overlapping
EUNL ahead
16.7%
2 of 12 windows
AVWC ahead
83.3%
10 of 12 windows

€200 a month into each, 2025–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,588 in EUNL and €2,608 in AVWC, leaving AVWC €20 ahead.

OutcomeEUNLAVWC
Paid in€2,400€2,400
Value at the end of 2025€2,588€2,608
Gain on the money paid in+€188+€208
Gain in %+7.82%+8.66%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or AVWC better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 1 times and AVWC 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,790 in EUNL versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and AVWC?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, EUNL or AVWC?

EUNL and AVWC swung about equally: annualised volatility of 14.3% for EUNL against 14.3% for AVWC, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 18.3% of trading days and AVWC on 16.3%. Both had their worst day on 3 Apr 2025: EUNL closed -4.92% and AVWC -5.26%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or AVWC?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: EUNL fell -21.73% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 3 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low; AVWC fell -21.65% from its peak on 18 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low.

How often did EUNL beat AVWC over a 12-month period?

Across the 12 rolling 12-month windows since October 2024, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 16.7% of them (2) and AVWC in 83.3% (10).

What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?

€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2025 grew to €10,790 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 7.9% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or AVWC.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.