SXRV (CNDX) vs AVWC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SXRV turned it into
€10,679
+6.79% per year on average · 20252025
AVWC turned it into
€10,908
+9.08% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
−€229
AVWC made more of the same money

SXRV vs AVWC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
SXRV won
2
years
AVWC won
1
years
YearSXRVAVWCWinner
2026 (so far)+21.95%+16.36%SXRV
2025+6.79%+9.08%AVWC
2024+33.55%+2.94%SXRV
2023+51.19%
2022-30.05%
2021+39.34%
2020+34.48%
2019+42.90%
2018+3.03%
2017+15.81%
2016+9.96%
2015+21.87%
2014+37.26%
2013+32.30%
2012+13.01%
2011+5.73%
2010-9.35%

SXRV vs AVWC in plain words

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — AVWC is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and AVWC 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,679 in SXRV versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it tilts a broad developed-market portfolio towards cheaper, more profitable and smaller companies rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World IMI.

Fund facts: SXRV vs AVWC

FactSXRVAVWC
FundiShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexAvantis Global Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.30%0.22%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched26 Jan 201025 Sept 2024
ISINIE00B53SZB19IE000RJECXS5
WKNA0YEDLA40GB8
Also trades asCNDX

Frequently asked

Is SXRV or AVWC better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and AVWC 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,679 in SXRV versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SXRV and AVWC?

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — AVWC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in SXRV have become?

€10,000 invested in SXRV at the start of 2025 grew to €10,679 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 6.8% per year.

Is CNDX the same as SXRV?

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SXRV or AVWC.