WEBN vs SXRV (CNDX): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexSXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
SXRV turned it into
€10,698
+6.98% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
+€272
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs SXRV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
SXRV won
2
years
YearWEBNSXRVWinner
2026 (so far)+16.52%+24.31%SXRV
2025+9.70%+6.98%WEBN
2024+6.17%+33.55%SXRV
2023—+51.19%—
2022—-30.05%—
2021—+39.34%—
2020—+34.48%—
2019—+42.90%—
2018—+3.03%—
2017—+15.81%—
2016—+9.96%—
2015—+21.87%—
2014—+37.26%—
2013—+32.30%—
2012—+13.01%—
2011—+5.73%—
2010—-9.35%—

WEBN vs SXRV in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,698 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs SXRV

FactWEBNSXRV
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202426 Jan 2010
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B53SZB19
WKNETF151A0YEDL
Also trades as—CNDX
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in WEBN becameWhat €10,000 in SXRV became

How bumpy the ride was: WEBN vs SXRV

These head-to-head figures use only the 564 trading days both funds were listed: 15 Jul 2024 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.2 years.

SXRV swung more than WEBN: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 20.0% for SXRV, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and SXRV on 32.1%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; SXRV's was -6.03% on 3 Apr 2025.

SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -26.69% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low; WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.91, and they closed in opposite directions on 13.9% of the 563 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 25 Feb 2025, when WEBN moved -0.47% and SXRV -2.91%.

MeasureWEBNSXRV
Annualised volatility14.5%20.0%
Worst day-4.84% on 9 Apr 2025-6.03% on 3 Apr 2025
Best day+3.90% on 10 Apr 2025+4.93% on 10 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more20.4% of days32.1% of days
Deepest drawdown-21.22%-26.69%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 202519 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025
Back above the old peak19 Sept 2025 · 5 months2 Oct 2025 · 5 months

Years WEBN and SXRV parted ways

In 1 of the 2 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: WEBN returned +6.17% and SXRV +33.55%, a gap of 27.4 points. They rose together in 2 years.

YearWEBNSXRVGap (WEBN − SXRV)
2024+6.17%+33.55%-27.4 pts

How often WEBN beat SXRV over any 12 months

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 26.7% of them (4) and SXRV in 73.3% (11).

12-month windows
15
month-end to month-end, overlapping
WEBN ahead
26.7%
4 of 15 windows
SXRV ahead
73.3%
11 of 15 windows

€200 a month into each, 2025–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,613 in WEBN and €2,629 in SXRV, leaving SXRV €16 ahead.

OutcomeWEBNSXRV
Paid in€2,400€2,400
Value at the end of 2025€2,613€2,629
Gain on the money paid in+€213+€229
Gain in %+8.86%+9.53%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or SXRV better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,698 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and SXRV?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, WEBN or SXRV?

SXRV swung more than WEBN: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 20.0% for SXRV, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and SXRV on 32.1%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; SXRV's was -6.03% on 3 Apr 2025.

Which had the deeper drawdown, WEBN or SXRV?

SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -26.69% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 2 Oct 2025, 5 months after the low; WEBN fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low.

How often did WEBN beat SXRV over a 12-month period?

Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 26.7% of them (4) and SXRV in 73.3% (11).

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is CNDX the same as SXRV?

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or SXRV.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.