SXRV (CNDX) vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund B

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

SXRV vs DEGC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
2
where both funds were trading
SXRV won
2
years
DEGC won
0
years
YearSXRVDEGCWinner
2026 (so far)+24.31%+15.71%SXRV
2025+6.98%+1.95%SXRV
2024+33.55%——
2023+51.19%——
2022-30.05%——
2021+39.34%——
2020+34.48%——
2019+42.90%——
2018+3.03%——
2017+15.81%——
2016+9.96%——
2015+21.87%——
2014+37.26%——
2013+32.30%——
2012+13.01%——
2011+5.73%——
2010-9.35%——

SXRV vs DEGC in plain words

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.

Fund facts: SXRV vs DEGC

FactSXRVDEGC
FundiShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexDimensional Global Core Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.30%0.26%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched26 Jan 201012 Nov 2025
ISINIE00B53SZB19IE000EGGFVG6
WKNA0YEDLA41E9T
Also trades asCNDX—
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in SXRV becameWhat €10,000 in DEGC became

How bumpy the ride was: SXRV vs DEGC

These head-to-head figures use only the 218 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Nov 2025 to 7 Oct 2026, 10 months.

SXRV swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 16.9% for SXRV against 9.2% for DEGC, with SXRV moving 1% or more on 32.7% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. SXRV's worst day was -2.57% on 9 Jun 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -8.93% from its peak on 19 Jun 2026 to a low on 29 Jul 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 22 Sept 2026, 1 month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.75, and they closed in opposite directions on 23.5% of the 217 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 4 Aug 2026, when SXRV moved +2.91% and DEGC +0.71%.

MeasureSXRVDEGC
Annualised volatility16.9%9.2%
Worst day-2.57% on 9 Jun 2026-1.80% on 9 Mar 2026
Best day+2.97% on 8 Apr 2026+1.70% on 1 Apr 2026
Days moving 1% or more32.7% of days8.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-8.93%-5.49%
Peak to trough19 Jun 2026 → 29 Jul 20262 Mar 2026 → 27 Mar 2026
Back above the old peak22 Sept 2026 · 1 month16 Apr 2026 · under a month

Years SXRV and DEGC parted ways

In the one completed calendar year both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. In 2025, SXRV returned +6.98% and DEGC +1.95%, a gap of 5.0 points. They rose together in 1 year.

YearSXRVDEGCGap (SXRV − DEGC)
2025+6.98%+1.95%+5.0 pts

Frequently asked

Is SXRV or DEGC better?

Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SXRV and DEGC?

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, SXRV or DEGC?

SXRV swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 16.9% for SXRV against 9.2% for DEGC, with SXRV moving 1% or more on 32.7% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. SXRV's worst day was -2.57% on 9 Jun 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SXRV or DEGC?

SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -8.93% from its peak on 19 Jun 2026 to a low on 29 Jul 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 22 Sept 2026, 1 month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.

Is CNDX the same as SXRV?

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SXRV or DEGC.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.