SXRV (CNDX) vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
SXRV
DimensionalDEGC
SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
SXRV vs DEGC, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SXRV | DEGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +24.31% | +15.71% | SXRV |
| 2025 | +6.98% | +1.95% | SXRV |
| 2024 | +33.55% | — | — |
| 2023 | +51.19% | — | — |
| 2022 | -30.05% | — | — |
| 2021 | +39.34% | — | — |
| 2020 | +34.48% | — | — |
| 2019 | +42.90% | — | — |
| 2018 | +3.03% | — | — |
| 2017 | +15.81% | — | — |
| 2016 | +9.96% | — | — |
| 2015 | +21.87% | — | — |
| 2014 | +37.26% | — | — |
| 2013 | +32.30% | — | — |
| 2012 | +13.01% | — | — |
| 2011 | +5.73% | — | — |
| 2010 | -9.35% | — | — |
SXRV vs DEGC in plain words
SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.
CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.
Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.
Fund facts: SXRV vs DEGC
| Fact | SXRV | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) | Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) |
| Tracks | Nasdaq-100 Index | Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.26% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2010 | 12 Nov 2025 |
| ISIN | IE00B53SZB19 | IE000EGGFVG6 |
| WKN | A0YEDL | A41E9T |
| Also trades as | CNDX | — |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in SXRV became | What €10,000 in DEGC became |
How bumpy the ride was: SXRV vs DEGC
These head-to-head figures use only the 218 trading days both funds were listed: 24 Nov 2025 to 7 Oct 2026, 10 months.
SXRV swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 16.9% for SXRV against 9.2% for DEGC, with SXRV moving 1% or more on 32.7% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. SXRV's worst day was -2.57% on 9 Jun 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.
SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -8.93% from its peak on 19 Jun 2026 to a low on 29 Jul 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 22 Sept 2026, 1 month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.
Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.75, and they closed in opposite directions on 23.5% of the 217 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 4 Aug 2026, when SXRV moved +2.91% and DEGC +0.71%.
| Measure | SXRV | DEGC |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.9% | 9.2% |
| Worst day | -2.57% on 9 Jun 2026 | -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026 |
| Best day | +2.97% on 8 Apr 2026 | +1.70% on 1 Apr 2026 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 32.7% of days | 8.8% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -8.93% | -5.49% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Jun 2026 → 29 Jul 2026 | 2 Mar 2026 → 27 Mar 2026 |
| Back above the old peak | 22 Sept 2026 · 1 month | 16 Apr 2026 · under a month |
Years SXRV and DEGC parted ways
In the one completed calendar year both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. In 2025, SXRV returned +6.98% and DEGC +1.95%, a gap of 5.0 points. They rose together in 1 year.
| Year | SXRV | DEGC | Gap (SXRV − DEGC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +6.98% | +1.95% | +5.0 pts |
Frequently asked
Is SXRV or DEGC better?
Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SXRV and DEGC?
SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, SXRV or DEGC?
SXRV swung more than DEGC: annualised volatility of 16.9% for SXRV against 9.2% for DEGC, with SXRV moving 1% or more on 32.7% of trading days and DEGC on 8.8%. SXRV's worst day was -2.57% on 9 Jun 2026; DEGC's was -1.80% on 9 Mar 2026.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SXRV or DEGC?
SXRV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -8.93% from its peak on 19 Jun 2026 to a low on 29 Jul 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 22 Sept 2026, 1 month after the low; DEGC fell -5.49% from its peak on 2 Mar 2026 to a low on 27 Mar 2026, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Apr 2026, under a month after the low.
Is CNDX the same as SXRV?
CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SXRV or DEGC.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.