Originave

WEBN vs AVWC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Amundi logoWEBN
Fund B
AvantisAVWC

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
AVWC turned it into
€10,908
+9.08% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
+€62
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs AVWC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
2
years
AVWC won
1
years
YearWEBNAVWCWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+16.36%AVWC
2025+9.70%+9.08%WEBN
2024+6.17%+2.94%WEBN

WEBN vs AVWC in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and AVWC 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Actively managed: it tilts a broad developed-market portfolio towards cheaper, more profitable and smaller companies rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World IMI.

Fund facts: WEBN vs AVWC

FactWEBNAVWC
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexAvantis Global Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.22%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202425 Sept 2024
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE000RJECXS5
WKNETF151A40GB8

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or AVWC better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and AVWC 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,908 in AVWC by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and AVWC?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while AVWC follows the Avantis Global Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and AVWC charges 0.22% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or AVWC.

SXR8vsWEBNVUAAvsWEBNSPYLvsWEBNSPYYvsWEBNSPYIvsWEBNVWCEvsWEBNWEBNvsEUNLWEBNvsIUSQ