WEBN vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
WEBN
IS3Q
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?
You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
WEBN vs IS3Q, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | WEBN | IS3Q | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +16.52% | +15.60% | WEBN |
| 2025 | +9.70% | +2.80% | WEBN |
| 2024 | +6.17% | +23.78% | IS3Q |
| 2023 | — | +21.70% | — |
| 2022 | — | -14.84% | — |
| 2021 | — | +34.28% | — |
| 2020 | — | +4.44% | — |
| 2019 | — | +33.90% | — |
| 2018 | — | -3.45% | — |
| 2017 | — | +8.34% | — |
| 2016 | — | +7.85% | — |
| 2015 | — | +14.52% | — |
| 2014 | — | -14.79% | — |
WEBN vs IS3Q in plain words
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and IS3Q 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,280 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.
Fund facts: WEBN vs IS3Q
| Fact | WEBN | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) | iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF |
| Tracks | Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.25% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 5 Jun 2024 | 3 Oct 2014 |
| ISIN | IE0003XJA0J9 | IE00BP3QZ601 |
| WKN | ETF151 | A12ATE |
| Also trades as | — | IWQU |
| €10,000 invested | What €10,000 in WEBN became | What €10,000 in IS3Q became |
How bumpy the ride was: WEBN vs IS3Q
These head-to-head figures use only the 564 trading days both funds were listed: 15 Jul 2024 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 2.2 years.
WEBN swung more than IS3Q: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 13.6% for IS3Q, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IS3Q on 15.6%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; IS3Q's was -5.05% on 3 Apr 2025.
WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low; IS3Q fell -20.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2026, 8 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.93, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.2% of the 563 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 13 Mar 2025, when WEBN moved +0.76% and IS3Q -0.78%.
| Measure | WEBN | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 14.5% | 13.6% |
| Worst day | -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025 | -5.05% on 3 Apr 2025 |
| Best day | +3.90% on 10 Apr 2025 | +3.56% on 10 Apr 2025 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 20.4% of days | 15.6% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -21.22% | -20.63% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025 | 19 Feb 2025 → 9 Apr 2025 |
| Back above the old peak | 19 Sept 2025 · 5 months | 6 Jan 2026 · 8 months |
Years WEBN and IS3Q parted ways
In every one of the 2 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: WEBN returned +6.17% and IS3Q +23.78%, a gap of 17.6 points. They rose together in 2 years.
| Year | WEBN | IS3Q | Gap (WEBN − IS3Q) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +9.70% | +2.80% | +6.9 pts |
| 2024 | +6.17% | +23.78% | -17.6 pts |
How often WEBN beat IS3Q over any 12 months
Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 100.0% of them (15) and IS3Q in 0.0% (0).
€200 a month into each, 2025–2025
Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2025 to December 2025 (12 payments, €2,400 in total) would have grown to €2,613 in WEBN and €2,531 in IS3Q, leaving WEBN €82 ahead.
| Outcome | WEBN | IS3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | €2,400 | €2,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | €2,613 | €2,531 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +€213 | +€131 |
| Gain in % | +8.86% | +5.46% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is WEBN or IS3Q better?
Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and IS3Q 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,280 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between WEBN and IS3Q?
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
Which is more volatile, WEBN or IS3Q?
WEBN swung more than IS3Q: annualised volatility of 14.5% for WEBN against 13.6% for IS3Q, with WEBN moving 1% or more on 20.4% of trading days and IS3Q on 15.6%. WEBN's worst day was -4.84% on 9 Apr 2025; IS3Q's was -5.05% on 3 Apr 2025.
Which had the deeper drawdown, WEBN or IS3Q?
WEBN had the deeper drawdown: it fell -21.22% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 19 Sept 2025, 5 months after the low; IS3Q fell -20.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2025 to a low on 9 Apr 2025, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2026, 8 months after the low.
How often did WEBN beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?
Across the 15 rolling 12-month windows since July 2024, measured month-end to month-end, WEBN finished ahead in 100.0% of them (15) and IS3Q in 0.0% (0).
What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?
€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.
Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?
IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IS3Q.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.