EUNL (IWDA) vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

EUNL tracks the MSCI World IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

EUNL turned it into
€29,391
+11.38% per year on average · 2016–2025
IS3Q turned it into
€27,943
+10.82% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+€1,449
EUNL made more of the same money

EUNL vs IS3Q, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
13
where both funds were trading
EUNL won
6
years
IS3Q won
7
years
YearEUNLIS3QWinner
2026 (so far)+15.53%+15.60%IS3Q
2025+7.90%+2.80%EUNL
2024+25.93%+23.78%EUNL
2023+20.13%+21.70%IS3Q
2022-13.59%-14.84%EUNL
2021+32.71%+34.28%IS3Q
2020+5.48%+4.44%EUNL
2019+31.34%+33.90%IS3Q
2018-5.13%-3.45%IS3Q
2017+7.71%+8.34%IS3Q
2016+10.91%+7.85%EUNL
2015+10.81%+14.52%IS3Q
2014+20.38%-14.79%EUNL
2013+21.89%——
2012+12.45%——
2011-3.26%——
2010+19.38%——
2009+4.65%——

EUNL vs IS3Q in plain words

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 6 times and IS3Q 7 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €29,391 in EUNL versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: EUNL vs IS3Q

FactEUNLIS3Q
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF
TracksMSCI World IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 20093 Oct 2014
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00BP3QZ601
WKNA0RPWHA12ATE
Also trades asIWDAIWQU
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in EUNL becameWhat €10,000 in IS3Q became

How bumpy the ride was: EUNL vs IS3Q

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,042 trading days both funds were listed: 6 Oct 2014 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 12.1 years.

IS3Q swung more than EUNL: annualised volatility of 15.9% for EUNL against 20.3% for IS3Q, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.6% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. EUNL's worst day was -9.65% on 12 Mar 2020; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.

EUNL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.78, and they closed in opposite directions on 6.2% of the 3,041 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 30 Oct 2014, when EUNL moved +1.16% and IS3Q +28.14%.

MeasureEUNLIS3Q
Annualised volatility15.9%20.3%
Worst day-9.65% on 12 Mar 2020-23.32% on 16 Oct 2014
Best day+8.22% on 24 Mar 2020+28.14% on 30 Oct 2014
Days moving 1% or more21.6% of days20.9% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.63%-32.31%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak7 Jan 2021 · 9 months20 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years EUNL and IS3Q parted ways

In 2 of the 12 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2014: EUNL returned +20.38% and IS3Q -14.79%, a gap of 35.2 points. They rose together in 9 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearEUNLIS3QGap (EUNL − IS3Q)
2025+7.90%+2.80%+5.1 pts
2014+20.38%-14.79%+35.2 pts

How often EUNL beat IS3Q over any 12 months

Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 45.5% of them (60) and IS3Q in 54.5% (72).

12-month windows
132
month-end to month-end, overlapping
EUNL ahead
45.5%
60 of 132 windows
IS3Q ahead
54.5%
72 of 132 windows

€200 a month into each, 2015–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2015 to December 2025 (132 payments, €26,400 in total) would have grown to €53,305 in EUNL and €50,948 in IS3Q, leaving EUNL €2,358 ahead.

OutcomeEUNLIS3Q
Paid in€26,400€26,400
Value at the end of 2025€53,305€50,948
Gain on the money paid in+€26,905+€24,548
Gain in %+101.91%+92.98%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is EUNL or IS3Q better?

Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, EUNL finished the year ahead 6 times and IS3Q 7 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €29,391 in EUNL versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between EUNL and IS3Q?

EUNL tracks the MSCI World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. EUNL charges 0.20% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — EUNL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, EUNL or IS3Q?

IS3Q swung more than EUNL: annualised volatility of 15.9% for EUNL against 20.3% for IS3Q, with EUNL moving 1% or more on 21.6% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. EUNL's worst day was -9.65% on 12 Mar 2020; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.

Which had the deeper drawdown, EUNL or IS3Q?

EUNL had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.63% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 7 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did EUNL beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?

Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, EUNL finished ahead in 45.5% of them (60) and IS3Q in 54.5% (72).

What would €10,000 in EUNL have become?

€10,000 invested in EUNL at the start of 2016 grew to €29,391 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.4% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring EUNL or IS3Q.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.