IS3R (IWMO) vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

IS3R tracks the MSCI World Momentum IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

IS3R turned it into
€33,149
+12.73% per year on average · 2016–2025
IS3Q turned it into
€27,943
+10.82% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+€5,207
IS3R made more of the same money

IS3R vs IS3Q, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
13
where both funds were trading
IS3R won
9
years
IS3Q won
4
years
YearIS3RIS3QWinner
2026 (so far)+25.60%+15.60%IS3R
2025+8.37%+2.80%IS3R
2024+37.95%+23.78%IS3R
2023+8.09%+21.70%IS3Q
2022-13.60%-14.84%IS3R
2021+24.50%+34.28%IS3Q
2020+16.41%+4.44%IS3R
2019+31.50%+33.90%IS3Q
2018+0.27%-3.45%IS3R
2017+16.07%+8.34%IS3R
2016+7.03%+7.85%IS3Q
2015+15.77%+14.52%IS3R
2014-13.37%-14.79%IS3R

IS3R vs IS3Q in plain words

IS3R tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.25% a year in running costs.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, IS3R finished the year ahead 9 times and IS3Q 4 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €33,149 in IS3R versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWMO is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ825 — IS3R is its EUR line on Xetra.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: IS3R vs IS3Q

FactIS3RIS3Q
FundiShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETFiShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF
TracksMSCI World Momentum IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.25%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched3 Oct 20143 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BP3QZ825IE00BP3QZ601
WKNA12ATFA12ATE
Also trades asIWMOIWQU
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in IS3R becameWhat €10,000 in IS3Q became

How bumpy the ride was: IS3R vs IS3Q

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,040 trading days both funds were listed: 6 Oct 2014 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 12.1 years.

IS3R swung more than IS3Q: annualised volatility of 22.3% for IS3R against 20.3% for IS3Q, with IS3R moving 1% or more on 28.4% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. IS3R's worst day was -20.00% on 3 Nov 2014; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.

IS3Q had the deeper drawdown: it fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3R fell -30.77% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.81, and they closed in opposite directions on 13.5% of the 3,039 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 22 Oct 2014, when IS3R moved -18.19% and IS3Q +4.18%.

MeasureIS3RIS3Q
Annualised volatility22.3%20.3%
Worst day-20.00% on 3 Nov 2014-23.32% on 16 Oct 2014
Best day+28.03% on 30 Oct 2014+28.14% on 30 Oct 2014
Days moving 1% or more28.4% of days20.9% of days
Deepest drawdown-30.77%-32.31%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak27 Aug 2020 · 5 months20 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years IS3R and IS3Q parted ways

In 6 of the 12 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: IS3R returned +37.95% and IS3Q +23.78%, a gap of 14.2 points. They rose together in 9 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearIS3RIS3QGap (IS3R − IS3Q)
2025+8.37%+2.80%+5.6 pts
2024+37.95%+23.78%+14.2 pts
2023+8.09%+21.70%-13.6 pts
2021+24.50%+34.28%-9.8 pts
2020+16.41%+4.44%+12.0 pts
2017+16.07%+8.34%+7.7 pts

How often IS3R beat IS3Q over any 12 months

Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, IS3R finished ahead in 64.4% of them (85) and IS3Q in 35.6% (47).

12-month windows
132
month-end to month-end, overlapping
IS3R ahead
64.4%
85 of 132 windows
IS3Q ahead
35.6%
47 of 132 windows

€200 a month into each, 2015–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2015 to December 2025 (132 payments, €26,400 in total) would have grown to €56,322 in IS3R and €50,948 in IS3Q, leaving IS3R €5,374 ahead.

OutcomeIS3RIS3Q
Paid in€26,400€26,400
Value at the end of 2025€56,322€50,948
Gain on the money paid in+€29,922+€24,548
Gain in %+113.34%+92.98%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is IS3R or IS3Q better?

Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, IS3R finished the year ahead 9 times and IS3Q 4 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth €33,149 in IS3R versus €27,943 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between IS3R and IS3Q?

IS3R tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.25% a year in running costs. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, IS3R or IS3Q?

IS3R swung more than IS3Q: annualised volatility of 22.3% for IS3R against 20.3% for IS3Q, with IS3R moving 1% or more on 28.4% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.9%. IS3R's worst day was -20.00% on 3 Nov 2014; IS3Q's was -23.32% on 16 Oct 2014.

Which had the deeper drawdown, IS3R or IS3Q?

IS3Q had the deeper drawdown: it fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3R fell -30.77% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 27 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did IS3R beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?

Across the 132 rolling 12-month windows since October 2014, measured month-end to month-end, IS3R finished ahead in 64.4% of them (85) and IS3Q in 35.6% (47).

What would €10,000 in IS3R have become?

€10,000 invested in IS3R at the start of 2016 grew to €33,149 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.7% per year.

Is IWMO the same as IS3R?

IWMO is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ825 — IS3R is its EUR line on Xetra.

Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring IS3R or IS3Q.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.