VWCE (VWRA) vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 6 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VWCE turned it into
€18,817
+11.11% per year on average · 2020–2025
IS3Q turned it into
€18,497
+10.79% per year on average · 2020–2025
Difference
+€320
VWCE made more of the same money

VWCE vs IS3Q, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VWCE won
5
years
IS3Q won
3
years
YearVWCEIS3QWinner
2026 (so far)+16.75%+15.60%VWCE
2025+9.16%+2.80%VWCE
2024+24.41%+23.78%VWCE
2023+18.18%+21.70%IS3Q
2022-13.47%-14.84%VWCE
2021+28.62%+34.28%IS3Q
2020+5.36%+4.44%VWCE
2019+7.56%+33.90%IS3Q
2018—-3.45%—
2017—+8.34%—
2016—+7.85%—
2015—+14.52%—
2014—-14.79%—

VWCE vs IS3Q in plain words

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWCE charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — VWCE is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWCE finished the year ahead 5 times and IS3Q 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth €18,817 in VWCE versus €18,497 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VWRA (London, USD) and VWRP (London, GBP) are listings of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRL is its distributing sibling.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: VWCE vs IS3Q

FactVWCEIS3Q
FundVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF
TracksFTSE All-World IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.19%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched23 Jul 20193 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BK5BQT80IE00BP3QZ601
WKNA2PKXGA12ATE
Also trades asVWRAIWQU
€10,000 investedWhat €10,000 in VWCE becameWhat €10,000 in IS3Q became

How bumpy the ride was: VWCE vs IS3Q

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,828 trading days both funds were listed: 29 Jul 2019 to 7 Oct 2026, roughly 7.3 years.

VWCE and IS3Q swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.0% for VWCE against 15.9% for IS3Q, with VWCE moving 1% or more on 20.8% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.4%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VWCE closed -9.41% and IS3Q -8.05%.

VWCE had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.97, and they closed in opposite directions on 8.4% of the 1,827 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 16 Mar 2020, when VWCE moved -3.15% and IS3Q -1.70%.

MeasureVWCEIS3Q
Annualised volatility16.0%15.9%
Worst day-9.41% on 12 Mar 2020-8.05% on 12 Mar 2020
Best day+8.42% on 24 Mar 2020+7.77% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more20.8% of days20.4% of days
Deepest drawdown-33.43%-32.31%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak6 Jan 2021 · 9 months20 Jan 2021 · 9 months

Years VWCE and IS3Q parted ways

In 3 of the 7 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2019: VWCE returned +7.56% and IS3Q +33.90%, a gap of 26.3 points. They rose together in 6 years and fell together in 1 year.

YearVWCEIS3QGap (VWCE − IS3Q)
2025+9.16%+2.80%+6.4 pts
2021+28.62%+34.28%-5.7 pts
2019+7.56%+33.90%-26.3 pts

How often VWCE beat IS3Q over any 12 months

Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VWCE finished ahead in 52.0% of them (39) and IS3Q in 48.0% (36).

12-month windows
75
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VWCE ahead
52.0%
39 of 75 windows
IS3Q ahead
48.0%
36 of 75 windows

€200 a month into each, 2020–2025

Putting €200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2020 to December 2025 (72 payments, €14,400 in total) would have grown to €21,310 in VWCE and €20,546 in IS3Q, leaving VWCE €764 ahead.

OutcomeVWCEIS3Q
Paid in€14,400€14,400
Value at the end of 2025€21,310€20,546
Gain on the money paid in+€6,910+€6,146
Gain in %+47.98%+42.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VWCE or IS3Q better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWCE finished the year ahead 5 times and IS3Q 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth €18,817 in VWCE versus €18,497 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VWCE and IS3Q?

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWCE charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — VWCE is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Which is more volatile, VWCE or IS3Q?

VWCE and IS3Q swung about equally: annualised volatility of 16.0% for VWCE against 15.9% for IS3Q, with VWCE moving 1% or more on 20.8% of trading days and IS3Q on 20.4%. Both had their worst day on 12 Mar 2020: VWCE closed -9.41% and IS3Q -8.05%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VWCE or IS3Q?

VWCE had the deeper drawdown: it fell -33.43% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low; IS3Q fell -32.31% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Jan 2021, 9 months after the low.

How often did VWCE beat IS3Q over a 12-month period?

Across the 75 rolling 12-month windows since July 2019, measured month-end to month-end, VWCE finished ahead in 52.0% of them (39) and IS3Q in 48.0% (36).

What would €10,000 in VWCE have become?

€10,000 invested in VWCE at the start of 2020 grew to €18,817 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.1% per year.

Is VWRA the same as VWCE?

VWRA (London, USD) and VWRP (London, GBP) are listings of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRL is its distributing sibling.

Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VWCE or IS3Q.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the EUR trading lines on Xetra, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.