QQQM vs SCHG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexSCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index

What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

QQQM turned it into
$20,250
+15.16% per year on average · 2021–2025
SCHG turned it into
$20,798
+15.77% per year on average · 2021–2025
Difference
−$548
SCHG made more of the same money

QQQM vs SCHG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
QQQM won
3
years
SCHG won
4
years
YearQQQMSCHGWinner
2026 (so far)+20.88%+10.51%QQQM
2025+20.85%+17.50%QQQM
2024+25.68%+34.96%SCHG
2023+55.01%+50.11%QQQM
2022-32.52%-31.80%SCHG
2021+27.45%+28.12%SCHG
2020+6.67%+39.14%SCHG
2019—+36.02%—
2018—-1.36%—
2017—+28.05%—
2016—+6.55%—
2015—+3.24%—
2014—+15.80%—
2013—+34.04%—
2012—+16.89%—
2011—-0.74%—
2010—+14.92%—

QQQM vs SCHG in plain words

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 3 times and SCHG 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $20,798 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: QQQM vs SCHG

FactQQQMSCHG
FundInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.04%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched13 Oct 202011 Dec 2009
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in QQQM becameWhat $10,000 in SCHG became

How bumpy the ride was: QQQM vs SCHG

These head-to-head figures use only the 1,502 trading days both funds were listed: 13 Oct 2020 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 6.0 years.

QQQM and SCHG swung about equally: annualised volatility of 22.2% for QQQM against 21.8% for SCHG, with QQQM moving 1% or more on 40.3% of trading days and SCHG on 39.0%. Both had their worst day on 4 Apr 2025: QQQM closed -6.11% and SCHG -6.11%.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: QQQM fell -35.04% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 12 Dec 2023, 13 months after the low; SCHG fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low.

Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.98, and they closed in opposite directions on 6.1% of the 1,501 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 1 Jul 2026, when QQQM moved -1.44% and SCHG +0.80%.

MeasureQQQMSCHG
Annualised volatility22.2%21.8%
Worst day-6.11% on 4 Apr 2025-6.11% on 4 Apr 2025
Best day+11.74% on 9 Apr 2025+11.59% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more40.3% of days39.0% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.04%-34.59%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 3 Nov 202219 Nov 2021 → 5 Jan 2023
Back above the old peak12 Dec 2023 · 13 months18 Dec 2023 · 11 months

Years QQQM and SCHG parted ways

In 2 of the 6 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2020: QQQM returned +6.67% and SCHG +39.14%, a gap of 32.5 points. They rose together in 5 years and fell together in 1 year.

YearQQQMSCHGGap (QQQM − SCHG)
2024+25.68%+34.96%-9.3 pts
2020+6.67%+39.14%-32.5 pts

How often QQQM beat SCHG over any 12 months

Across the 60 rolling 12-month windows since October 2020, measured month-end to month-end, QQQM finished ahead in 45.0% of them (27) and SCHG in 55.0% (33).

12-month windows
60
month-end to month-end, overlapping
QQQM ahead
45.0%
27 of 60 windows
SCHG ahead
55.0%
33 of 60 windows

$200 a month into each, 2021–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2021 to December 2025 (60 payments, $12,000 in total) would have grown to $19,699 in QQQM and $20,040 in SCHG, leaving SCHG $341 ahead.

OutcomeQQQMSCHG
Paid in$12,000$12,000
Value at the end of 2025$19,699$20,040
Gain on the money paid in+$7,699+$8,040
Gain in %+64.16%+67.00%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is QQQM or SCHG better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 3 times and SCHG 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $20,798 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between QQQM and SCHG?

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, QQQM or SCHG?

QQQM and SCHG swung about equally: annualised volatility of 22.2% for QQQM against 21.8% for SCHG, with QQQM moving 1% or more on 40.3% of trading days and SCHG on 39.0%. Both had their worst day on 4 Apr 2025: QQQM closed -6.11% and SCHG -6.11%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, QQQM or SCHG?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: QQQM fell -35.04% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 12 Dec 2023, 13 months after the low; SCHG fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low.

How often did QQQM beat SCHG over a 12-month period?

Across the 60 rolling 12-month windows since October 2020, measured month-end to month-end, QQQM finished ahead in 45.0% of them (27) and SCHG in 55.0% (33).

What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?

$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring QQQM or SCHG.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.