SPY vs SCHG: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SPY
SCHG
SPY tracks the S&P 500 IndexSCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SPY vs SCHG, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SPY | SCHG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.71% | +10.51% | SPY |
| 2025 | +17.72% | +17.50% | SPY |
| 2024 | +24.89% | +34.96% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +26.18% | +50.11% | SCHG |
| 2022 | -18.18% | -31.80% | SPY |
| 2021 | +28.73% | +28.12% | SPY |
| 2020 | +18.33% | +39.14% | SCHG |
| 2019 | +31.22% | +36.02% | SCHG |
| 2018 | -4.57% | -1.36% | SCHG |
| 2017 | +21.71% | +28.05% | SCHG |
| 2016 | +12.00% | +6.55% | SPY |
| 2015 | +1.23% | +3.24% | SCHG |
| 2014 | +13.46% | +15.80% | SCHG |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +34.04% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +15.99% | +16.89% | SCHG |
| 2011 | +1.89% | -0.74% | SPY |
| 2010 | +15.06% | +14.92% | SPY |
| 2009 | +26.35% | — | — |
| 2008 | -36.80% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.15% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.85% | — | — |
| 2005 | +4.83% | — | — |
| 2004 | +10.70% | — | — |
| 2003 | +28.18% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.58% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.76% | — | — |
| 2000 | -9.74% | — | — |
| 1999 | +20.39% | — | — |
| 1998 | +28.69% | — | — |
| 1997 | +33.48% | — | — |
| 1996 | +22.50% | — | — |
| 1995 | +38.05% | — | — |
| 1994 | +0.40% | — | — |
| 1993 | +8.71% | — | — |
SPY vs SCHG in plain words
SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPY charges 0.0945% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SPY finished the year ahead 7 times and SCHG 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,466 in SPY versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SPY vs SCHG
| Fact | SPY | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.0945% | 0.04% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 22 Jan 1993 | 11 Dec 2009 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in SPY became | What $10,000 in SCHG became |
How bumpy the ride was: SPY vs SCHG
These head-to-head figures use only the 4,215 trading days both funds were listed: 4 Jan 2010 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 16.7 years.
SCHG swung more than SPY: annualised volatility of 17.0% for SPY against 19.7% for SCHG, with SPY moving 1% or more on 23.9% of trading days and SCHG on 30.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SPY closed -10.94% and SCHG -12.55%.
SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; SPY fell -33.72% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.96, and they closed in opposite directions on 9.8% of the 4,214 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Nov 2020, when SPY moved +1.26% and SCHG -2.03%.
| Measure | SPY | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 17.0% | 19.7% |
| Worst day | -10.94% on 16 Mar 2020 | -12.55% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +10.50% on 9 Apr 2025 | +11.59% on 9 Apr 2025 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 23.9% of days | 30.1% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.72% | -34.59% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 19 Nov 2021 → 5 Jan 2023 |
| Back above the old peak | 10 Aug 2020 · 4 months | 18 Dec 2023 · 11 months |
Years SPY and SCHG parted ways
In 6 of the 16 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: SPY returned +26.18% and SCHG +50.11%, a gap of 23.9 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | SPY | SCHG | Gap (SPY − SCHG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +24.89% | +34.96% | -10.1 pts |
| 2023 | +26.18% | +50.11% | -23.9 pts |
| 2022 | -18.18% | -31.80% | +13.6 pts |
| 2020 | +18.33% | +39.14% | -20.8 pts |
| 2017 | +21.71% | +28.05% | -6.3 pts |
| 2016 | +12.00% | +6.55% | +5.4 pts |
How often SPY beat SCHG over any 12 months
Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SPY finished ahead in 33.3% of them (63) and SCHG in 66.7% (126).
$200 a month into each, 2011–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2011 to December 2025 (180 payments, $36,000 in total) would have grown to $118,139 in SPY and $155,821 in SCHG, leaving SCHG $37,682 ahead.
| Outcome | SPY | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $36,000 | $36,000 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $118,139 | $155,821 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$82,139 | +$119,821 |
| Gain in % | +228.16% | +332.84% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SPY or SCHG better?
Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SPY finished the year ahead 7 times and SCHG 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,466 in SPY versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SPY and SCHG?
SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPY charges 0.0945% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, SPY or SCHG?
SCHG swung more than SPY: annualised volatility of 17.0% for SPY against 19.7% for SCHG, with SPY moving 1% or more on 23.9% of trading days and SCHG on 30.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SPY closed -10.94% and SCHG -12.55%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SPY or SCHG?
SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; SPY fell -33.72% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low.
How often did SPY beat SCHG over a 12-month period?
Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SPY finished ahead in 33.3% of them (63) and SCHG in 66.7% (126).
What would $10,000 in SPY have become?
$10,000 invested in SPY at the start of 2016 grew to $39,466 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.