SCHG vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$1,000
SCHG made more of the same money

SCHG vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
SCHG won
6
years
SPMO won
6
years
YearSCHGSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+10.51%+27.80%SPMO
2025+17.50%+26.58%SPMO
2024+34.96%+45.82%SPMO
2023+50.11%+17.56%SCHG
2022-31.80%-10.45%SPMO
2021+28.12%+22.51%SCHG
2020+39.14%+27.80%SCHG
2019+36.02%+25.93%SCHG
2018-1.36%-0.92%SPMO
2017+28.05%+27.76%SCHG
2016+6.55%+7.18%SPMO
2015+3.24%+2.78%SCHG
2014+15.80%——
2013+34.04%——
2012+16.89%——
2011-0.74%——
2010+14.92%——

SCHG vs SPMO in plain words

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 6 times and SPMO 6 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SCHG vs SPMO

FactSCHGSPMO
FundSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.04%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched11 Dec 20099 Oct 2015
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in SCHG becameWhat $10,000 in SPMO became

How bumpy the ride was: SCHG vs SPMO

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

SCHG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for SCHG against 20.4% for SPMO, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 32.5% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and SPMO -15.35%.

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.83, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.3% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 10 Nov 2022, when SCHG moved +7.47% and SPMO +2.11%.

MeasureSCHGSPMO
Annualised volatility21.1%20.4%
Worst day-12.55% on 16 Mar 2020-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.59% on 9 Apr 2025+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more32.5% of days28.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-34.59%-30.95%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 5 Jan 202319 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak18 Dec 2023 · 11 months8 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years SCHG and SPMO parted ways

In 7 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: SCHG returned +50.11% and SPMO +17.56%, a gap of 32.5 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearSCHGSPMOGap (SCHG − SPMO)
2025+17.50%+26.58%-9.1 pts
2024+34.96%+45.82%-10.9 pts
2023+50.11%+17.56%+32.5 pts
2022-31.80%-10.45%-21.4 pts
2021+28.12%+22.51%+5.6 pts
2020+39.14%+27.80%+11.3 pts
2019+36.02%+25.93%+10.1 pts

How often SCHG beat SPMO over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 47.5% of them (57) and SPMO in 52.5% (63).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SCHG ahead
47.5%
57 of 120 windows
SPMO ahead
52.5%
63 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $66,378 in SCHG and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving SPMO $1,704 ahead.

OutcomeSCHGSPMO
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$66,378$68,082
Gain on the money paid in+$42,378+$44,082
Gain in %+176.58%+183.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SCHG or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 6 times and SPMO 6 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SCHG and SPMO?

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, SCHG or SPMO?

SCHG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for SCHG against 20.4% for SPMO, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 32.5% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and SPMO -15.35%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SCHG or SPMO?

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did SCHG beat SPMO over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 47.5% of them (57) and SPMO in 52.5% (63).

What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?

$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or SPMO.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.