SPMO vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$14,309
SPMO made more of the same money

SPMO vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
SPMO won
8
years
SPHQ won
4
years
YearSPMOSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+27.80%+12.92%SPMO
2025+26.58%+13.25%SPMO
2024+45.82%+25.44%SPMO
2023+17.56%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-10.45%-15.76%SPMO
2021+22.51%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+27.80%+16.93%SPMO
2019+25.93%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-0.92%-7.09%SPMO
2017+27.76%+19.10%SPMO
2016+7.18%+14.30%SPHQ
2015+2.78%+1.64%SPMO
2014—+16.08%—
2013—+32.73%—
2012—+14.32%—
2011—+6.28%—
2010—+20.50%—
2009—+12.59%—
2008—-46.35%—
2007—+16.77%—
2006—+4.58%—
2005—-2.05%—

SPMO vs SPHQ in plain words

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPMO charges 0.13% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SPMO finished the year ahead 8 times and SPHQ 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $51,975 in SPMO versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SPMO vs SPHQ

FactSPMOSPHQ
FundInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksS&P 500 Momentum IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.13%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched9 Oct 20156 Dec 2005
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in SPMO becameWhat $10,000 in SPHQ became

How bumpy the ride was: SPMO vs SPHQ

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

SPMO swung more than SPHQ: annualised volatility of 20.4% for SPMO against 17.6% for SPHQ, with SPMO moving 1% or more on 28.5% of trading days and SPHQ on 24.0%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SPMO closed -15.35% and SPHQ -10.30%.

SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -31.59% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 4 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.85, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.5% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 16 Mar 2020, when SPMO moved -15.35% and SPHQ -10.30%.

MeasureSPMOSPHQ
Annualised volatility20.4%17.6%
Worst day-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020-10.30% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025+10.30% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more28.5% of days24.0% of days
Deepest drawdown-30.95%-31.59%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202012 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak8 Jul 2020 · 3 months4 Aug 2020 · 4 months

Years SPMO and SPHQ parted ways

In 10 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: SPMO returned +45.82% and SPHQ +25.44%, a gap of 20.4 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearSPMOSPHQGap (SPMO − SPHQ)
2025+26.58%+13.25%+13.3 pts
2024+45.82%+25.44%+20.4 pts
2023+17.56%+24.83%-7.3 pts
2022-10.45%-15.76%+5.3 pts
2021+22.51%+27.59%-5.1 pts
2020+27.80%+16.93%+10.9 pts
2019+25.93%+33.63%-7.7 pts
2018-0.92%-7.09%+6.2 pts
2017+27.76%+19.10%+8.7 pts
2016+7.18%+14.30%-7.1 pts

How often SPMO beat SPHQ over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, SPMO finished ahead in 62.5% of them (75) and SPHQ in 37.5% (45).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SPMO ahead
62.5%
75 of 120 windows
SPHQ ahead
37.5%
45 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $68,082 in SPMO and $51,517 in SPHQ, leaving SPMO $16,565 ahead.

OutcomeSPMOSPHQ
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$68,082$51,517
Gain on the money paid in+$44,082+$27,517
Gain in %+183.68%+114.65%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SPMO or SPHQ better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SPMO finished the year ahead 8 times and SPHQ 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $51,975 in SPMO versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SPMO and SPHQ?

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPMO charges 0.13% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, SPMO or SPHQ?

SPMO swung more than SPHQ: annualised volatility of 20.4% for SPMO against 17.6% for SPHQ, with SPMO moving 1% or more on 28.5% of trading days and SPHQ on 24.0%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SPMO closed -15.35% and SPHQ -10.30%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SPMO or SPHQ?

SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -31.59% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 4 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did SPMO beat SPHQ over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, SPMO finished ahead in 62.5% of them (75) and SPHQ in 37.5% (45).

What would $10,000 in SPMO have become?

$10,000 invested in SPMO at the start of 2016 grew to $51,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SPMO or SPHQ.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.