VTI vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTI
SPHQ
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VTI vs SPHQ, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTI | SPHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.58% | +12.92% | SPHQ |
| 2025 | +17.10% | +13.25% | VTI |
| 2024 | +23.81% | +25.44% | SPHQ |
| 2023 | +26.05% | +24.83% | VTI |
| 2022 | -19.52% | -15.76% | SPHQ |
| 2021 | +25.68% | +27.59% | SPHQ |
| 2020 | +21.08% | +16.93% | VTI |
| 2019 | +30.67% | +33.63% | SPHQ |
| 2018 | -5.23% | -7.09% | VTI |
| 2017 | +21.21% | +19.10% | VTI |
| 2016 | +12.82% | +14.30% | SPHQ |
| 2015 | +0.36% | +1.64% | SPHQ |
| 2014 | +12.55% | +16.08% | SPHQ |
| 2013 | +33.45% | +32.73% | VTI |
| 2012 | +16.45% | +14.32% | VTI |
| 2011 | +0.97% | +6.28% | SPHQ |
| 2010 | +17.43% | +20.50% | SPHQ |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +12.59% | VTI |
| 2008 | -36.99% | -46.35% | VTI |
| 2007 | +5.37% | +16.77% | SPHQ |
| 2006 | +15.70% | +4.58% | VTI |
| 2005 | +6.30% | -2.05% | VTI |
| 2004 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2003 | +30.74% | — | — |
| 2002 | -20.48% | — | — |
| 2001 | -4.40% | — | — |
VTI vs SPHQ in plain words
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 22 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 11 times and SPHQ 11 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTI vs SPHQ
| Fact | VTI | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Total Market Index | S&P 500 Quality Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 24 May 2001 | 6 Dec 2005 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VTI became | What $10,000 in SPHQ became |
How bumpy the ride was: VTI vs SPHQ
These head-to-head figures use only the 5,240 trading days both funds were listed: 6 Dec 2005 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 20.8 years.
VTI and SPHQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 19.4% for VTI against 19.2% for SPHQ, with VTI moving 1% or more on 26.8% of trading days and SPHQ on 27.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and SPHQ -10.30%.
SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -57.83% from its peak on 29 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 53 months after the low; VTI fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.91, and they closed in opposite directions on 12.0% of the 5,239 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 21 Jun 2007, when VTI moved +0.50% and SPHQ +7.38%.
| Measure | VTI | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 19.4% | 19.2% |
| Worst day | -11.38% on 16 Mar 2020 | -10.30% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +12.83% on 13 Oct 2008 | +12.89% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 26.8% of days | 27.1% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -55.45% | -57.83% |
| Peak to trough | 9 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 | 29 Oct 2007 → 20 Nov 2008 |
| Back above the old peak | 13 Mar 2012 · 36 months | 14 May 2013 · 53 months |
Years VTI and SPHQ parted ways
In 6 of the 21 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2009: VTI returned +28.90% and SPHQ +12.59%, a gap of 16.3 points. They rose together in 17 years, fell together in 3 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | VTI | SPHQ | Gap (VTI − SPHQ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +0.97% | +6.28% | -5.3 pts |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +12.59% | +16.3 pts |
| 2008 | -36.99% | -46.35% | +9.4 pts |
| 2007 | +5.37% | +16.77% | -11.4 pts |
| 2006 | +15.70% | +4.58% | +11.1 pts |
| 2005 | +6.30% | -2.05% | +8.4 pts |
How often VTI beat SPHQ over any 12 months
Across the 238 rolling 12-month windows since December 2005, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 46.6% of them (111) and SPHQ in 53.4% (127).
$200 a month into each, 2006–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2006 to December 2025 (240 payments, $48,000 in total) would have grown to $206,443 in VTI and $202,349 in SPHQ, leaving VTI $4,094 ahead.
| Outcome | VTI | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $48,000 | $48,000 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $206,443 | $202,349 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$158,443 | +$154,349 |
| Gain in % | +330.09% | +321.56% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VTI or SPHQ better?
Across the 22 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 11 times and SPHQ 11 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTI and SPHQ?
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VTI or SPHQ?
VTI and SPHQ swung about equally: annualised volatility of 19.4% for VTI against 19.2% for SPHQ, with VTI moving 1% or more on 26.8% of trading days and SPHQ on 27.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and SPHQ -10.30%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VTI or SPHQ?
SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -57.83% from its peak on 29 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 53 months after the low; VTI fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
How often did VTI beat SPHQ over a 12-month period?
Across the 238 rolling 12-month windows since December 2005, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 46.6% of them (111) and SPHQ in 53.4% (127).
What would $10,000 in VTI have become?
$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2016 grew to $37,896 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.3% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.