IVV vs VTI: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVV
VTI
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexVTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs VTI, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.74% | +12.58% | IVV |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +17.10% | IVV |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +23.81% | IVV |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +26.05% | IVV |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -19.52% | IVV |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +25.68% | IVV |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +21.08% | VTI |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +30.67% | IVV |
| 2018 | -4.49% | -5.23% | IVV |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +21.21% | IVV |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +12.82% | VTI |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +0.36% | IVV |
| 2014 | +13.57% | +12.55% | IVV |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +33.45% | VTI |
| 2012 | +16.06% | +16.45% | VTI |
| 2011 | +1.88% | +0.97% | IVV |
| 2010 | +15.10% | +17.43% | VTI |
| 2009 | +26.61% | +28.90% | VTI |
| 2008 | -37.01% | -36.99% | VTI |
| 2007 | +5.29% | +5.37% | VTI |
| 2006 | +15.94% | +15.70% | IVV |
| 2005 | +4.87% | +6.30% | VTI |
| 2004 | +10.79% | +12.78% | VTI |
| 2003 | +28.46% | +30.74% | VTI |
| 2002 | -21.53% | -20.48% | VTI |
| 2001 | -11.96% | -4.40% | VTI |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs VTI in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VTI follows the CRSP US Total Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 26 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 13 times and VTI 13 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $37,896 in VTI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs VTI
| Fact | IVV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | CRSP US Total Market Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 24 May 2001 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in IVV became | What $10,000 in VTI became |
How bumpy the ride was: IVV vs VTI
These head-to-head figures use only the 6,364 trading days both funds were listed: 15 Jun 2001 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 25.3 years.
IVV and VTI swung about equally: annualised volatility of 18.8% for IVV against 19.0% for VTI, with IVV moving 1% or more on 26.4% of trading days and VTI on 27.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and VTI -11.38%.
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: IVV fell -55.25% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Aug 2012, 41 months after the low; VTI fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.99, and they closed in opposite directions on 5.0% of the 6,363 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 13 Oct 2008, when IVV moved +10.28% and VTI +12.83%.
| Measure | IVV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 18.8% | 19.0% |
| Worst day | -11.57% on 16 Mar 2020 | -11.38% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +11.10% on 28 Oct 2008 | +12.83% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 26.4% of days | 27.3% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -55.25% | -55.45% |
| Peak to trough | 9 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 | 9 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 16 Aug 2012 · 41 months | 13 Mar 2012 · 36 months |
Years IVV and VTI parted ways
In 1 of the 25 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2001: IVV returned -11.96% and VTI -4.40%, a gap of 7.6 points. They rose together in 20 years and fell together in 5 years.
| Year | IVV | VTI | Gap (IVV − VTI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | -11.96% | -4.40% | -7.6 pts |
How often IVV beat VTI over any 12 months
Across the 292 rolling 12-month windows since June 2001, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 46.9% of them (137) and VTI in 53.1% (155).
$200 a month into each, 2002–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2002 to December 2025 (288 payments, $57,600 in total) would have grown to $307,956 in IVV and $301,434 in VTI, leaving IVV $6,522 ahead.
| Outcome | IVV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $57,600 | $57,600 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $307,956 | $301,434 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$250,356 | +$243,834 |
| Gain in % | +434.65% | +423.32% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is IVV or VTI better?
Across the 26 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 13 times and VTI 13 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $37,896 in VTI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and VTI?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VTI follows the CRSP US Total Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, IVV or VTI?
IVV and VTI swung about equally: annualised volatility of 18.8% for IVV against 19.0% for VTI, with IVV moving 1% or more on 26.4% of trading days and VTI on 27.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and VTI -11.38%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, IVV or VTI?
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: IVV fell -55.25% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Aug 2012, 41 months after the low; VTI fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
How often did IVV beat VTI over a 12-month period?
Across the 292 rolling 12-month windows since June 2001, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 46.9% of them (137) and VTI in 53.1% (155).
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.