VTI vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VTI turned it into
$37,896
+14.25% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
−$14,079
SPMO made more of the same money

VTI vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
VTI won
4
years
SPMO won
8
years
YearVTISPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+12.58%+27.80%SPMO
2025+17.10%+26.58%SPMO
2024+23.81%+45.82%SPMO
2023+26.05%+17.56%VTI
2022-19.52%-10.45%SPMO
2021+25.68%+22.51%VTI
2020+21.08%+27.80%SPMO
2019+30.67%+25.93%VTI
2018-5.23%-0.92%SPMO
2017+21.21%+27.76%SPMO
2016+12.82%+7.18%VTI
2015+0.36%+2.78%SPMO
2014+12.55%——
2013+33.45%——
2012+16.45%——
2011+0.97%——
2010+17.43%——
2009+28.90%——
2008-36.99%——
2007+5.37%——
2006+15.70%——
2005+6.30%——
2004+12.78%——
2003+30.74%——
2002-20.48%——
2001-4.40%——

VTI vs SPMO in plain words

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VTI vs SPMO

FactVTISPMO
FundVanguard Total Stock Market ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksCRSP US Total Market IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 May 20019 Oct 2015
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VTI becameWhat $10,000 in SPMO became

How bumpy the ride was: VTI vs SPMO

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

SPMO swung more than VTI: annualised volatility of 18.0% for VTI against 20.4% for SPMO, with VTI moving 1% or more on 24.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and SPMO -15.35%.

VTI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.00% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 12 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.84, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.8% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 17 Mar 2020, when VTI moved +5.01% and SPMO +10.21%.

MeasureVTISPMO
Annualised volatility18.0%20.4%
Worst day-11.38% on 16 Mar 2020-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+10.15% on 9 Apr 2025+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more24.9% of days28.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.00%-30.95%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak12 Aug 2020 · 4 months8 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years VTI and SPMO parted ways

In 7 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: VTI returned +23.81% and SPMO +45.82%, a gap of 22.0 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearVTISPMOGap (VTI − SPMO)
2025+17.10%+26.58%-9.5 pts
2024+23.81%+45.82%-22.0 pts
2023+26.05%+17.56%+8.5 pts
2022-19.52%-10.45%-9.1 pts
2020+21.08%+27.80%-6.7 pts
2017+21.21%+27.76%-6.5 pts
2016+12.82%+7.18%+5.6 pts

How often VTI beat SPMO over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 33.3% of them (40) and SPMO in 66.7% (80).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VTI ahead
33.3%
40 of 120 windows
SPMO ahead
66.7%
80 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $52,037 in VTI and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving SPMO $16,045 ahead.

OutcomeVTISPMO
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$52,037$68,082
Gain on the money paid in+$28,037+$44,082
Gain in %+116.82%+183.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VTI or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VTI and SPMO?

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VTI or SPMO?

SPMO swung more than VTI: annualised volatility of 18.0% for VTI against 20.4% for SPMO, with VTI moving 1% or more on 24.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and SPMO -15.35%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VTI or SPMO?

VTI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.00% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 12 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did VTI beat SPMO over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 33.3% of them (40) and SPMO in 66.7% (80).

What would $10,000 in VTI have become?

$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2016 grew to $37,896 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.3% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VTI or SPMO.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.