VUG vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VUG
SPMO
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VUG vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VUG | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +11.18% | +27.80% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +19.40% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +32.69% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +46.83% | +17.56% | VUG |
| 2022 | -33.16% | -10.45% | SPMO |
| 2021 | +27.35% | +22.51% | VUG |
| 2020 | +40.25% | +27.80% | VUG |
| 2019 | +37.03% | +25.93% | VUG |
| 2018 | -3.32% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +27.72% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +6.27% | +7.18% | SPMO |
| 2015 | +3.24% | +2.78% | VUG |
| 2014 | +13.61% | — | — |
| 2013 | +32.48% | — | — |
| 2012 | +17.01% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.82% | — | — |
| 2010 | +17.22% | — | — |
| 2009 | +36.14% | — | — |
| 2008 | -38.02% | — | — |
| 2007 | +12.52% | — | — |
| 2006 | +9.19% | — | — |
| 2005 | +5.02% | — | — |
| 2004 | +4.99% | — | — |
VUG vs SPMO in plain words
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VUG vs SPMO
| Fact | VUG | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Growth ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 9 Oct 2015 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VUG became | What $10,000 in SPMO became |
How bumpy the ride was: VUG vs SPMO
These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.
VUG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for VUG against 20.4% for SPMO, with VUG moving 1% or more on 32.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPMO -15.35%.
VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.84, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.5% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 10 Nov 2022, when VUG moved +7.89% and SPMO +2.11%.
| Measure | VUG | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 21.1% | 20.4% |
| Worst day | -12.62% on 16 Mar 2020 | -15.35% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +11.63% on 9 Apr 2025 | +11.20% on 9 Apr 2025 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 32.9% of days | 28.5% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -35.61% | -30.95% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Nov 2021 → 3 Nov 2022 | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 23 Jan 2024 · 14 months | 8 Jul 2020 · 3 months |
Years VUG and SPMO parted ways
In 6 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VUG returned +46.83% and SPMO +17.56%, a gap of 29.3 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.
| Year | VUG | SPMO | Gap (VUG − SPMO) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +19.40% | +26.58% | -7.2 pts |
| 2024 | +32.69% | +45.82% | -13.1 pts |
| 2023 | +46.83% | +17.56% | +29.3 pts |
| 2022 | -33.16% | -10.45% | -22.7 pts |
| 2020 | +40.25% | +27.80% | +12.4 pts |
| 2019 | +37.03% | +25.93% | +11.1 pts |
How often VUG beat SPMO over any 12 months
Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 45.0% of them (54) and SPMO in 55.0% (66).
$200 a month into each, 2016–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $63,534 in VUG and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving SPMO $4,548 ahead.
| Outcome | VUG | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $24,000 | $24,000 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $63,534 | $68,082 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$39,534 | +$44,082 |
| Gain in % | +164.73% | +183.68% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VUG or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VUG and SPMO?
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VUG or SPMO?
VUG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for VUG against 20.4% for SPMO, with VUG moving 1% or more on 32.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPMO -15.35%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VUG or SPMO?
VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.
How often did VUG beat SPMO over a 12-month period?
Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 45.0% of them (54) and SPMO in 55.0% (66).
What would $10,000 in VUG have become?
$10,000 invested in VUG at the start of 2016 grew to $49,942 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.4% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.