VUG vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VUG turned it into
$49,942
+17.45% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
−$2,033
SPMO made more of the same money

VUG vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
VUG won
5
years
SPMO won
7
years
YearVUGSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+11.18%+27.80%SPMO
2025+19.40%+26.58%SPMO
2024+32.69%+45.82%SPMO
2023+46.83%+17.56%VUG
2022-33.16%-10.45%SPMO
2021+27.35%+22.51%VUG
2020+40.25%+27.80%VUG
2019+37.03%+25.93%VUG
2018-3.32%-0.92%SPMO
2017+27.72%+27.76%SPMO
2016+6.27%+7.18%SPMO
2015+3.24%+2.78%VUG
2014+13.61%——
2013+32.48%——
2012+17.01%——
2011+1.82%——
2010+17.22%——
2009+36.14%——
2008-38.02%——
2007+12.52%——
2006+9.19%——
2005+5.02%——
2004+4.99%——

VUG vs SPMO in plain words

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VUG vs SPMO

FactVUGSPMO
FundVanguard Growth ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksCRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 20049 Oct 2015
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VUG becameWhat $10,000 in SPMO became

How bumpy the ride was: VUG vs SPMO

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

VUG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for VUG against 20.4% for SPMO, with VUG moving 1% or more on 32.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPMO -15.35%.

VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.84, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.5% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 10 Nov 2022, when VUG moved +7.89% and SPMO +2.11%.

MeasureVUGSPMO
Annualised volatility21.1%20.4%
Worst day-12.62% on 16 Mar 2020-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.63% on 9 Apr 2025+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more32.9% of days28.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.61%-30.95%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 3 Nov 202219 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak23 Jan 2024 · 14 months8 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years VUG and SPMO parted ways

In 6 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VUG returned +46.83% and SPMO +17.56%, a gap of 29.3 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearVUGSPMOGap (VUG − SPMO)
2025+19.40%+26.58%-7.2 pts
2024+32.69%+45.82%-13.1 pts
2023+46.83%+17.56%+29.3 pts
2022-33.16%-10.45%-22.7 pts
2020+40.25%+27.80%+12.4 pts
2019+37.03%+25.93%+11.1 pts

How often VUG beat SPMO over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 45.0% of them (54) and SPMO in 55.0% (66).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VUG ahead
45.0%
54 of 120 windows
SPMO ahead
55.0%
66 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $63,534 in VUG and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving SPMO $4,548 ahead.

OutcomeVUGSPMO
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$63,534$68,082
Gain on the money paid in+$39,534+$44,082
Gain in %+164.73%+183.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VUG or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VUG and SPMO?

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VUG or SPMO?

VUG swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.1% for VUG against 20.4% for SPMO, with VUG moving 1% or more on 32.9% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPMO -15.35%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VUG or SPMO?

VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did VUG beat SPMO over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 45.0% of them (54) and SPMO in 55.0% (66).

What would $10,000 in VUG have become?

$10,000 invested in VUG at the start of 2016 grew to $49,942 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VUG or SPMO.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.