VGT vs VUG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexVUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VGT turned it into
$76,464
+22.56% per year on average · 2016–2025
VUG turned it into
$49,942
+17.45% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$26,522
VGT made more of the same money

VGT vs VUG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
23
where both funds were trading
VGT won
14
years
VUG won
9
years
YearVGTVUGWinner
2026 (so far)+33.83%+11.18%VGT
2025+21.77%+19.40%VGT
2024+29.30%+32.69%VUG
2023+52.66%+46.83%VGT
2022-29.70%-33.16%VGT
2021+30.45%+27.35%VGT
2020+46.04%+40.25%VGT
2019+48.62%+37.03%VGT
2018+2.46%-3.32%VGT
2017+37.08%+27.72%VGT
2016+13.77%+6.27%VGT
2015+5.05%+3.24%VGT
2014+16.69%+13.61%VGT
2013+30.97%+32.48%VUG
2012+13.96%+17.01%VUG
2011+0.54%+1.82%VUG
2010+12.78%+17.22%VUG
2009+61.89%+36.14%VGT
2008-42.82%-38.02%VUG
2007+14.78%+12.52%VGT
2006+8.85%+9.19%VUG
2005+3.00%+5.02%VUG
2004-2.86%+4.99%VUG

VGT vs VUG in plain words

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VUG charges 0.03% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VUG 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VGT vs VUG

FactVGTVUG
FundVanguard Information Technology ETFVanguard Growth ETF
TracksMSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexCRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.09%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 200426 Jan 2004
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VGT becameWhat $10,000 in VUG became

How bumpy the ride was: VGT vs VUG

These head-to-head figures use only the 5,707 trading days both funds were listed: 30 Jan 2004 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 22.6 years.

VGT swung more than VUG: annualised volatility of 22.7% for VGT against 20.0% for VUG, with VGT moving 1% or more on 36.4% of trading days and VUG on 29.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and VUG -12.62%.

VGT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.95, and they closed in opposite directions on 10.6% of the 5,706 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 1 Apr 2015, when VGT moved -0.80% and VUG +2.43%.

MeasureVGTVUG
Annualised volatility22.7%20.0%
Worst day-13.49% on 16 Mar 2020-12.62% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+13.48% on 9 Apr 2025+11.94% on 13 Oct 2008
Days moving 1% or more36.4% of days29.3% of days
Deepest drawdown-54.63%-50.68%
Peak to trough31 Oct 2007 → 20 Nov 200831 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009
Back above the old peak6 Jan 2011 · 25 months8 Feb 2011 · 22 months

Years VGT and VUG parted ways

In 8 of the 22 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2009: VGT returned +61.89% and VUG +36.14%, a gap of 25.8 points. They rose together in 18 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 2 years.

YearVGTVUGGap (VGT − VUG)
2023+52.66%+46.83%+5.8 pts
2020+46.04%+40.25%+5.8 pts
2019+48.62%+37.03%+11.6 pts
2018+2.46%-3.32%+5.8 pts
2017+37.08%+27.72%+9.4 pts
2016+13.77%+6.27%+7.5 pts
2009+61.89%+36.14%+25.8 pts
2004-2.86%+4.99%-7.9 pts

How often VGT beat VUG over any 12 months

Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 66.3% of them (173) and VUG in 33.7% (88).

12-month windows
261
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VGT ahead
66.3%
173 of 261 windows
VUG ahead
33.7%
88 of 261 windows

$200 a month into each, 2005–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2005 to December 2025 (252 payments, $50,400 in total) would have grown to $470,456 in VGT and $308,579 in VUG, leaving VGT $161,876 ahead.

OutcomeVGTVUG
Paid in$50,400$50,400
Value at the end of 2025$470,456$308,579
Gain on the money paid in+$420,056+$258,179
Gain in %+833.44%+512.26%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VGT or VUG better?

Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VUG 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VGT and VUG?

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VUG charges 0.03% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VGT or VUG?

VGT swung more than VUG: annualised volatility of 22.7% for VGT against 20.0% for VUG, with VGT moving 1% or more on 36.4% of trading days and VUG on 29.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and VUG -12.62%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VGT or VUG?

VGT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.

How often did VGT beat VUG over a 12-month period?

Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 66.3% of them (173) and VUG in 33.7% (88).

What would $10,000 in VGT have become?

$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VGT or VUG.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.