VGT vs VTV: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VGT
VTV
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VGT vs VTV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VGT | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +33.83% | +14.85% | VGT |
| 2025 | +21.77% | +15.27% | VGT |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +15.95% | VGT |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +9.32% | VGT |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -2.09% | VTV |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +26.53% | VGT |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +2.33% | VGT |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +25.66% | VGT |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -5.47% | VGT |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +17.14% | VGT |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +17.10% | VTV |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -0.98% | VGT |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +13.17% | VGT |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +33.09% | VTV |
| 2012 | +13.96% | +15.18% | VTV |
| 2011 | +0.54% | +1.11% | VTV |
| 2010 | +12.78% | +14.54% | VTV |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +19.88% | VGT |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -35.89% | VTV |
| 2007 | +14.78% | -0.12% | VGT |
| 2006 | +8.85% | +22.38% | VTV |
| 2005 | +3.00% | +7.21% | VTV |
| 2004 | -2.86% | +13.85% | VTV |
VGT vs VTV in plain words
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VGT vs VTV
| Fact | VGT | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 26 Jan 2004 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VGT became | What $10,000 in VTV became |
How bumpy the ride was: VGT vs VTV
These head-to-head figures use only the 5,707 trading days both funds were listed: 30 Jan 2004 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 22.6 years.
VGT swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 22.7% for VGT against 18.5% for VTV, with VGT moving 1% or more on 36.4% of trading days and VTV on 22.7%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and VTV -11.08%.
VTV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -59.27% from its peak on 13 Jul 2007 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 1 Feb 2013, 46 months after the low; VGT fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low.
Day to day the two often go their own way: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.78, and they closed in opposite directions on 24.3% of the 5,706 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Apr 2025, when VGT moved +13.48% and VTV +6.64%.
| Measure | VGT | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 22.7% | 18.5% |
| Worst day | -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020 | -11.08% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +13.48% on 9 Apr 2025 | +10.77% on 28 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 36.4% of days | 22.7% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -54.63% | -59.27% |
| Peak to trough | 31 Oct 2007 → 20 Nov 2008 | 13 Jul 2007 → 5 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 6 Jan 2011 · 25 months | 1 Feb 2013 · 46 months |
Years VGT and VTV parted ways
In 14 of the 22 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2020: VGT returned +46.04% and VTV +2.33%, a gap of 43.7 points. They rose together in 16 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 4 years.
| Year | VGT | VTV | Gap (VGT − VTV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +21.77% | +15.27% | +6.5 pts |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +15.95% | +13.4 pts |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +9.32% | +43.3 pts |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -2.09% | -27.6 pts |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +2.33% | +43.7 pts |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +25.66% | +23.0 pts |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -5.47% | +7.9 pts |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +17.14% | +19.9 pts |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -0.98% | +6.0 pts |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +19.88% | +42.0 pts |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -35.89% | -6.9 pts |
| 2007 | +14.78% | -0.12% | +14.9 pts |
| 2006 | +8.85% | +22.38% | -13.5 pts |
| 2004 | -2.86% | +13.85% | -16.7 pts |
How often VGT beat VTV over any 12 months
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 72.4% of them (189) and VTV in 27.6% (72).
$200 a month into each, 2005–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2005 to December 2025 (252 payments, $50,400 in total) would have grown to $470,456 in VGT and $174,909 in VTV, leaving VGT $295,546 ahead.
| Outcome | VGT | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $50,400 | $50,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $470,456 | $174,909 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$420,056 | +$124,509 |
| Gain in % | +833.44% | +247.04% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VGT or VTV better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VGT and VTV?
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VGT or VTV?
VGT swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 22.7% for VGT against 18.5% for VTV, with VGT moving 1% or more on 36.4% of trading days and VTV on 22.7%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and VTV -11.08%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VGT or VTV?
VTV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -59.27% from its peak on 13 Jul 2007 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 1 Feb 2013, 46 months after the low; VGT fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low.
How often did VGT beat VTV over a 12-month period?
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 72.4% of them (189) and VTV in 27.6% (72).
What would $10,000 in VGT have become?
$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.