ACWI vs VTV: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
ACWI
VTV
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
ACWI vs VTV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | ACWI | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.94% | +14.85% | VTV |
| 2025 | +22.41% | +15.27% | ACWI |
| 2024 | +17.45% | +15.95% | ACWI |
| 2023 | +22.27% | +9.32% | ACWI |
| 2022 | -18.39% | -2.09% | VTV |
| 2021 | +18.66% | +26.53% | VTV |
| 2020 | +16.34% | +2.33% | ACWI |
| 2019 | +26.59% | +25.66% | ACWI |
| 2018 | -9.12% | -5.47% | VTV |
| 2017 | +24.33% | +17.14% | ACWI |
| 2016 | +8.40% | +17.10% | VTV |
| 2015 | -2.21% | -0.98% | VTV |
| 2014 | +3.83% | +13.17% | VTV |
| 2013 | +22.38% | +33.09% | VTV |
| 2012 | +16.75% | +15.18% | ACWI |
| 2011 | -7.82% | +1.11% | VTV |
| 2010 | +12.78% | +14.54% | VTV |
| 2009 | +32.36% | +19.88% | ACWI |
| 2008 | -35.29% | -35.89% | ACWI |
| 2007 | — | -0.12% | — |
| 2006 | — | +22.38% | — |
| 2005 | — | +7.21% | — |
| 2004 | — | +13.85% | — |
ACWI vs VTV in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: ACWI vs VTV
| Fact | ACWI | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Mar 2008 | 26 Jan 2004 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in ACWI became | What $10,000 in VTV became |
How bumpy the ride was: ACWI vs VTV
These head-to-head figures use only the 4,661 trading days both funds were listed: 28 Mar 2008 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 18.5 years.
ACWI swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 20.1% for ACWI against 19.4% for VTV, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 27.4% of trading days and VTV on 23.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and VTV -11.08%.
ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VTV fell -54.03% from its peak on 19 May 2008 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.93, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.6% of the 4,660 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 29 Oct 2008, when ACWI moved +1.63% and VTV -2.08%.
| Measure | ACWI | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 20.1% | 19.4% |
| Worst day | -11.22% on 16 Mar 2020 | -11.08% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +12.41% on 13 Oct 2008 | +10.77% on 28 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 27.4% of days | 23.8% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -56.28% | -54.03% |
| Peak to trough | 16 May 2008 → 9 Mar 2009 | 19 May 2008 → 5 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 6 Mar 2013 · 47 months | 13 Mar 2012 · 36 months |
Years ACWI and VTV parted ways
In 11 of the 18 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2022: ACWI returned -18.39% and VTV -2.09%, a gap of 16.3 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 4 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.
| Year | ACWI | VTV | Gap (ACWI − VTV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +22.41% | +15.27% | +7.1 pts |
| 2023 | +22.27% | +9.32% | +13.0 pts |
| 2022 | -18.39% | -2.09% | -16.3 pts |
| 2021 | +18.66% | +26.53% | -7.9 pts |
| 2020 | +16.34% | +2.33% | +14.0 pts |
| 2017 | +24.33% | +17.14% | +7.2 pts |
| 2016 | +8.40% | +17.10% | -8.7 pts |
| 2014 | +3.83% | +13.17% | -9.3 pts |
| 2013 | +22.38% | +33.09% | -10.7 pts |
| 2011 | -7.82% | +1.11% | -8.9 pts |
| 2009 | +32.36% | +19.88% | +12.5 pts |
How often ACWI beat VTV over any 12 months
Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 39.3% of them (83) and VTV in 60.7% (128).
$200 a month into each, 2009–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2009 to December 2025 (204 payments, $40,800 in total) would have grown to $114,514 in ACWI and $124,387 in VTV, leaving VTV $9,874 ahead.
| Outcome | ACWI | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $40,800 | $40,800 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $114,514 | $124,387 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$73,714 | +$83,587 |
| Gain in % | +180.67% | +204.87% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is ACWI or VTV better?
Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between ACWI and VTV?
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, ACWI or VTV?
ACWI swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 20.1% for ACWI against 19.4% for VTV, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 27.4% of trading days and VTV on 23.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and VTV -11.08%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, ACWI or VTV?
ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VTV fell -54.03% from its peak on 19 May 2008 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.
How often did ACWI beat VTV over a 12-month period?
Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 39.3% of them (83) and VTV in 60.7% (128).
What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?
$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or VTV.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.