ACWI vs VTV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 2016–2025
VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$526
ACWI made more of the same money

ACWI vs VTV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
19
where both funds were trading
ACWI won
9
years
VTV won
10
years
YearACWIVTVWinner
2026 (so far)+12.94%+14.85%VTV
2025+22.41%+15.27%ACWI
2024+17.45%+15.95%ACWI
2023+22.27%+9.32%ACWI
2022-18.39%-2.09%VTV
2021+18.66%+26.53%VTV
2020+16.34%+2.33%ACWI
2019+26.59%+25.66%ACWI
2018-9.12%-5.47%VTV
2017+24.33%+17.14%ACWI
2016+8.40%+17.10%VTV
2015-2.21%-0.98%VTV
2014+3.83%+13.17%VTV
2013+22.38%+33.09%VTV
2012+16.75%+15.18%ACWI
2011-7.82%+1.11%VTV
2010+12.78%+14.54%VTV
2009+32.36%+19.88%ACWI
2008-35.29%-35.89%ACWI
2007—-0.12%—
2006—+22.38%—
2005—+7.21%—
2004—+13.85%—

ACWI vs VTV in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: ACWI vs VTV

FactACWIVTV
FundiShares MSCI ACWI ETFVanguard Value ETF
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.32%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Mar 200826 Jan 2004
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in ACWI becameWhat $10,000 in VTV became

How bumpy the ride was: ACWI vs VTV

These head-to-head figures use only the 4,661 trading days both funds were listed: 28 Mar 2008 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 18.5 years.

ACWI swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 20.1% for ACWI against 19.4% for VTV, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 27.4% of trading days and VTV on 23.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and VTV -11.08%.

ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VTV fell -54.03% from its peak on 19 May 2008 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.93, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.6% of the 4,660 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 29 Oct 2008, when ACWI moved +1.63% and VTV -2.08%.

MeasureACWIVTV
Annualised volatility20.1%19.4%
Worst day-11.22% on 16 Mar 2020-11.08% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+12.41% on 13 Oct 2008+10.77% on 28 Oct 2008
Days moving 1% or more27.4% of days23.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-56.28%-54.03%
Peak to trough16 May 2008 → 9 Mar 200919 May 2008 → 5 Mar 2009
Back above the old peak6 Mar 2013 · 47 months13 Mar 2012 · 36 months

Years ACWI and VTV parted ways

In 11 of the 18 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2022: ACWI returned -18.39% and VTV -2.09%, a gap of 16.3 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 4 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearACWIVTVGap (ACWI − VTV)
2025+22.41%+15.27%+7.1 pts
2023+22.27%+9.32%+13.0 pts
2022-18.39%-2.09%-16.3 pts
2021+18.66%+26.53%-7.9 pts
2020+16.34%+2.33%+14.0 pts
2017+24.33%+17.14%+7.2 pts
2016+8.40%+17.10%-8.7 pts
2014+3.83%+13.17%-9.3 pts
2013+22.38%+33.09%-10.7 pts
2011-7.82%+1.11%-8.9 pts
2009+32.36%+19.88%+12.5 pts

How often ACWI beat VTV over any 12 months

Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 39.3% of them (83) and VTV in 60.7% (128).

12-month windows
211
month-end to month-end, overlapping
ACWI ahead
39.3%
83 of 211 windows
VTV ahead
60.7%
128 of 211 windows

$200 a month into each, 2009–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2009 to December 2025 (204 payments, $40,800 in total) would have grown to $114,514 in ACWI and $124,387 in VTV, leaving VTV $9,874 ahead.

OutcomeACWIVTV
Paid in$40,800$40,800
Value at the end of 2025$114,514$124,387
Gain on the money paid in+$73,714+$83,587
Gain in %+180.67%+204.87%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is ACWI or VTV better?

Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between ACWI and VTV?

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, ACWI or VTV?

ACWI swung more than VTV: annualised volatility of 20.1% for ACWI against 19.4% for VTV, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 27.4% of trading days and VTV on 23.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and VTV -11.08%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, ACWI or VTV?

ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VTV fell -54.03% from its peak on 19 May 2008 to a low on 5 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low.

How often did ACWI beat VTV over a 12-month period?

Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 39.3% of them (83) and VTV in 60.7% (128).

What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?

$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or VTV.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.