VGT vs ACWI: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VGT
ACWI
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VGT vs ACWI, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VGT | ACWI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +33.83% | +12.94% | VGT |
| 2025 | +21.77% | +22.41% | ACWI |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +17.45% | VGT |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +22.27% | VGT |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -18.39% | ACWI |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +18.66% | VGT |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +16.34% | VGT |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +26.59% | VGT |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -9.12% | VGT |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +24.33% | VGT |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +8.40% | VGT |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -2.21% | VGT |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +3.83% | VGT |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +22.38% | VGT |
| 2012 | +13.96% | +16.75% | ACWI |
| 2011 | +0.54% | -7.82% | VGT |
| 2010 | +12.78% | +12.78% | Tie |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +32.36% | VGT |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -35.29% | ACWI |
| 2007 | +14.78% | — | — |
| 2006 | +8.85% | — | — |
| 2005 | +3.00% | — | — |
| 2004 | -2.86% | — | — |
VGT vs ACWI in plain words
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VGT vs ACWI
| Fact | VGT | ACWI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Information Technology ETF | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | MSCI ACWI Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.32% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 26 Mar 2008 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VGT became | What $10,000 in ACWI became |
How bumpy the ride was: VGT vs ACWI
These head-to-head figures use only the 4,661 trading days both funds were listed: 28 Mar 2008 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 18.5 years.
VGT swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 23.8% for VGT against 20.1% for ACWI, with VGT moving 1% or more on 37.7% of trading days and ACWI on 27.4%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and ACWI -11.22%.
ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VGT fell -49.97% from its peak on 5 Jun 2008 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2010, 16 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.88, and they closed in opposite directions on 17.6% of the 4,660 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Apr 2025, when VGT moved +13.48% and ACWI +8.79%.
| Measure | VGT | ACWI |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 23.8% | 20.1% |
| Worst day | -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020 | -11.22% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +13.48% on 9 Apr 2025 | +12.41% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 37.7% of days | 27.4% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -49.97% | -56.28% |
| Peak to trough | 5 Jun 2008 → 20 Nov 2008 | 16 May 2008 → 9 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 13 Apr 2010 · 16 months | 6 Mar 2013 · 47 months |
Years VGT and ACWI parted ways
In 15 of the 18 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VGT returned +52.66% and ACWI +22.27%, a gap of 30.4 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 3 years.
| Year | VGT | ACWI | Gap (VGT − ACWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +29.30% | +17.45% | +11.9 pts |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +22.27% | +30.4 pts |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -18.39% | -11.3 pts |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +18.66% | +11.8 pts |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +16.34% | +29.7 pts |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +26.59% | +22.0 pts |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -9.12% | +11.6 pts |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +24.33% | +12.7 pts |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +8.40% | +5.4 pts |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -2.21% | +7.3 pts |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +3.83% | +12.9 pts |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +22.38% | +8.6 pts |
| 2011 | +0.54% | -7.82% | +8.4 pts |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +32.36% | +29.5 pts |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -35.29% | -7.5 pts |
How often VGT beat ACWI over any 12 months
Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 85.8% of them (181) and ACWI in 14.2% (30).
$200 a month into each, 2009–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2009 to December 2025 (204 payments, $40,800 in total) would have grown to $299,109 in VGT and $114,514 in ACWI, leaving VGT $184,595 ahead.
| Outcome | VGT | ACWI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $40,800 | $40,800 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $299,109 | $114,514 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$258,309 | +$73,714 |
| Gain in % | +633.11% | +180.67% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VGT or ACWI better?
Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VGT and ACWI?
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VGT or ACWI?
VGT swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 23.8% for VGT against 20.1% for ACWI, with VGT moving 1% or more on 37.7% of trading days and ACWI on 27.4%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and ACWI -11.22%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VGT or ACWI?
ACWI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -56.28% from its peak on 16 May 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Mar 2013, 47 months after the low; VGT fell -49.97% from its peak on 5 Jun 2008 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Apr 2010, 16 months after the low.
How often did VGT beat ACWI over a 12-month period?
Across the 211 rolling 12-month windows since March 2008, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 85.8% of them (181) and ACWI in 14.2% (30).
What would $10,000 in VGT have become?
$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.