VGT vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VGT turned it into
$76,464
+22.56% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$24,489
VGT made more of the same money

VGT vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
VGT won
9
years
SPMO won
3
years
YearVGTSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+33.83%+27.80%VGT
2025+21.77%+26.58%SPMO
2024+29.30%+45.82%SPMO
2023+52.66%+17.56%VGT
2022-29.70%-10.45%SPMO
2021+30.45%+22.51%VGT
2020+46.04%+27.80%VGT
2019+48.62%+25.93%VGT
2018+2.46%-0.92%VGT
2017+37.08%+27.76%VGT
2016+13.77%+7.18%VGT
2015+5.05%+2.78%VGT
2014+16.69%——
2013+30.97%——
2012+13.96%——
2011+0.54%——
2010+12.78%——
2009+61.89%——
2008-42.82%——
2007+14.78%——
2006+8.85%——
2005+3.00%——
2004-2.86%——

VGT vs SPMO in plain words

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 9 times and SPMO 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VGT vs SPMO

FactVGTSPMO
FundVanguard Information Technology ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksMSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.09%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 20049 Oct 2015
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VGT becameWhat $10,000 in SPMO became

How bumpy the ride was: VGT vs SPMO

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

VGT swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 24.4% for VGT against 20.4% for SPMO, with VGT moving 1% or more on 40.2% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and SPMO -15.35%.

VGT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.07% from its peak on 27 Dec 2021 to a low on 14 Oct 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Nov 2023, 13 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.84, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.8% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 10 Nov 2022, when VGT moved +8.47% and SPMO +2.11%.

MeasureVGTSPMO
Annualised volatility24.4%20.4%
Worst day-13.49% on 16 Mar 2020-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+13.48% on 9 Apr 2025+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more40.2% of days28.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.07%-30.95%
Peak to trough27 Dec 2021 → 14 Oct 202219 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak20 Nov 2023 · 13 months8 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years VGT and SPMO parted ways

In 8 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VGT returned +52.66% and SPMO +17.56%, a gap of 35.1 points. They rose together in 9 years, fell together in 1 year and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearVGTSPMOGap (VGT − SPMO)
2024+29.30%+45.82%-16.5 pts
2023+52.66%+17.56%+35.1 pts
2022-29.70%-10.45%-19.2 pts
2021+30.45%+22.51%+7.9 pts
2020+46.04%+27.80%+18.2 pts
2019+48.62%+25.93%+22.7 pts
2017+37.08%+27.76%+9.3 pts
2016+13.77%+7.18%+6.6 pts

How often VGT beat SPMO over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 70.8% of them (85) and SPMO in 29.2% (35).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VGT ahead
70.8%
85 of 120 windows
SPMO ahead
29.2%
35 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $79,192 in VGT and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving VGT $11,110 ahead.

OutcomeVGTSPMO
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$79,192$68,082
Gain on the money paid in+$55,192+$44,082
Gain in %+229.97%+183.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VGT or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 9 times and SPMO 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VGT and SPMO?

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VGT or SPMO?

VGT swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 24.4% for VGT against 20.4% for SPMO, with VGT moving 1% or more on 40.2% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VGT closed -13.49% and SPMO -15.35%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VGT or SPMO?

VGT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.07% from its peak on 27 Dec 2021 to a low on 14 Oct 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 20 Nov 2023, 13 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did VGT beat SPMO over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 70.8% of them (85) and SPMO in 29.2% (35).

What would $10,000 in VGT have become?

$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VGT or SPMO.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.