MTUM vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
−$13,469
SPMO made more of the same money

MTUM vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
MTUM won
4
years
SPMO won
8
years
YearMTUMSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+27.29%+27.80%SPMO
2025+22.15%+26.58%SPMO
2024+32.89%+45.82%SPMO
2023+9.15%+17.56%SPMO
2022-18.27%-10.45%SPMO
2021+13.36%+22.51%SPMO
2020+29.86%+27.80%MTUM
2019+27.25%+25.93%MTUM
2018-1.67%-0.92%SPMO
2017+37.50%+27.76%MTUM
2016+5.00%+7.18%SPMO
2015+8.91%+2.78%MTUM
2014+14.62%——
2013+19.21%——

MTUM vs SPMO in plain words

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. MTUM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: MTUM vs SPMO

FactMTUMSPMO
FundiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched16 Apr 20139 Oct 2015
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in MTUM becameWhat $10,000 in SPMO became

How bumpy the ride was: MTUM vs SPMO

These head-to-head figures use only the 2,762 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Oct 2015 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 11.0 years.

MTUM swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.3% for MTUM against 20.4% for SPMO, with MTUM moving 1% or more on 32.2% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: MTUM closed -12.37% and SPMO -15.35%.

MTUM had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.91, and they closed in opposite directions on 11.5% of the 2,761 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 25 Jul 2016, when MTUM moved -0.27% and SPMO +4.85%.

MeasureMTUMSPMO
Annualised volatility21.3%20.4%
Worst day-12.37% on 16 Mar 2020-15.35% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+10.65% on 24 Mar 2020+11.20% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more32.2% of days28.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-34.08%-30.95%
Peak to trough19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak6 Jul 2020 · 3 months8 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years MTUM and SPMO parted ways

In 6 of the 11 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2024: MTUM returned +32.89% and SPMO +45.82%, a gap of 12.9 points. They rose together in 9 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearMTUMSPMOGap (MTUM − SPMO)
2024+32.89%+45.82%-12.9 pts
2023+9.15%+17.56%-8.4 pts
2022-18.27%-10.45%-7.8 pts
2021+13.36%+22.51%-9.1 pts
2017+37.50%+27.76%+9.7 pts
2015+8.91%+2.78%+6.1 pts

How often MTUM beat SPMO over any 12 months

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, MTUM finished ahead in 33.3% of them (40) and SPMO in 66.7% (80).

12-month windows
120
month-end to month-end, overlapping
MTUM ahead
33.3%
40 of 120 windows
SPMO ahead
66.7%
80 of 120 windows

$200 a month into each, 2016–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2016 to December 2025 (120 payments, $24,000 in total) would have grown to $51,195 in MTUM and $68,082 in SPMO, leaving SPMO $16,887 ahead.

OutcomeMTUMSPMO
Paid in$24,000$24,000
Value at the end of 2025$51,195$68,082
Gain on the money paid in+$27,195+$44,082
Gain in %+113.31%+183.68%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is MTUM or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between MTUM and SPMO?

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. MTUM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, MTUM or SPMO?

MTUM swung more than SPMO: annualised volatility of 21.3% for MTUM against 20.4% for SPMO, with MTUM moving 1% or more on 32.2% of trading days and SPMO on 28.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: MTUM closed -12.37% and SPMO -15.35%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, MTUM or SPMO?

MTUM had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low; SPMO fell -30.95% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did MTUM beat SPMO over a 12-month period?

Across the 120 rolling 12-month windows since October 2015, measured month-end to month-end, MTUM finished ahead in 33.3% of them (40) and SPMO in 66.7% (80).

What would $10,000 in MTUM have become?

$10,000 invested in MTUM at the start of 2016 grew to $38,506 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring MTUM or SPMO.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.