VUG vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VUG turned it into
$49,942
+17.45% per year on average · 2016–2025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$11,436
VUG made more of the same money

VUG vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
VUG won
6
years
MTUM won
8
years
YearVUGMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+11.18%+27.29%MTUM
2025+19.40%+22.15%MTUM
2024+32.69%+32.89%MTUM
2023+46.83%+9.15%VUG
2022-33.16%-18.27%MTUM
2021+27.35%+13.36%VUG
2020+40.25%+29.86%VUG
2019+37.03%+27.25%VUG
2018-3.32%-1.67%MTUM
2017+27.72%+37.50%MTUM
2016+6.27%+5.00%VUG
2015+3.24%+8.91%MTUM
2014+13.61%+14.62%MTUM
2013+32.48%+19.21%VUG
2012+17.01%——
2011+1.82%——
2010+17.22%——
2009+36.14%——
2008-38.02%——
2007+12.52%——
2006+9.19%——
2005+5.02%——
2004+4.99%——

VUG vs MTUM in plain words

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VUG vs MTUM

FactVUGMTUM
FundVanguard Growth ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksCRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 200416 Apr 2013
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VUG becameWhat $10,000 in MTUM became

How bumpy the ride was: VUG vs MTUM

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,388 trading days both funds were listed: 18 Apr 2013 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 13.4 years.

VUG and MTUM swung about equally: annualised volatility of 19.9% for VUG against 20.1% for MTUM, with VUG moving 1% or more on 30.6% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and MTUM -12.37%.

VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.88, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.2% of the 3,387 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 10 Nov 2022, when VUG moved +7.89% and MTUM +2.64%.

MeasureVUGMTUM
Annualised volatility19.9%20.1%
Worst day-12.62% on 16 Mar 2020-12.37% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.63% on 9 Apr 2025+10.65% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more30.6% of days30.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-35.61%-34.08%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 3 Nov 202219 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak23 Jan 2024 · 14 months6 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years VUG and MTUM parted ways

In 8 of the 13 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VUG returned +46.83% and MTUM +9.15%, a gap of 37.7 points. They rose together in 11 years and fell together in 2 years.

YearVUGMTUMGap (VUG − MTUM)
2023+46.83%+9.15%+37.7 pts
2022-33.16%-18.27%-14.9 pts
2021+27.35%+13.36%+14.0 pts
2020+40.25%+29.86%+10.4 pts
2019+37.03%+27.25%+9.8 pts
2017+27.72%+37.50%-9.8 pts
2015+3.24%+8.91%-5.7 pts
2013+32.48%+19.21%+13.3 pts

How often VUG beat MTUM over any 12 months

Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 48.7% of them (73) and MTUM in 51.3% (77).

12-month windows
150
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VUG ahead
48.7%
73 of 150 windows
MTUM ahead
51.3%
77 of 150 windows

$200 a month into each, 2014–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2014 to December 2025 (144 payments, $28,800 in total) would have grown to $89,024 in VUG and $71,839 in MTUM, leaving VUG $17,185 ahead.

OutcomeVUGMTUM
Paid in$28,800$28,800
Value at the end of 2025$89,024$71,839
Gain on the money paid in+$60,224+$43,039
Gain in %+209.11%+149.44%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VUG or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VUG and MTUM?

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VUG or MTUM?

VUG and MTUM swung about equally: annualised volatility of 19.9% for VUG against 20.1% for MTUM, with VUG moving 1% or more on 30.6% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and MTUM -12.37%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VUG or MTUM?

VUG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -35.61% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 3 Nov 2022, then closed back above the old peak on 23 Jan 2024, 14 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did VUG beat MTUM over a 12-month period?

Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 48.7% of them (73) and MTUM in 51.3% (77).

What would $10,000 in VUG have become?

$10,000 invested in VUG at the start of 2016 grew to $49,942 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VUG or MTUM.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.