URTH vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

URTH tracks the MSCI World IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 2016–2025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
−$6,462
MTUM made more of the same money

URTH vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
URTH won
6
years
MTUM won
8
years
YearURTHMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+11.76%+27.29%MTUM
2025+21.36%+22.15%MTUM
2024+18.66%+32.89%MTUM
2023+23.95%+9.15%URTH
2022-17.97%-18.27%URTH
2021+22.27%+13.36%URTH
2020+15.78%+29.86%MTUM
2019+28.15%+27.25%URTH
2018-8.56%-1.67%MTUM
2017+22.95%+37.50%MTUM
2016+7.31%+5.00%URTH
2015-0.64%+8.91%MTUM
2014+4.37%+14.62%MTUM
2013+26.66%+19.21%URTH
2012+14.71%——

URTH vs MTUM in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — MTUM is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: URTH vs MTUM

FactURTHMTUM
FundiShares MSCI World ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksMSCI World IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.24%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched10 Jan 201216 Apr 2013
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in URTH becameWhat $10,000 in MTUM became

How bumpy the ride was: URTH vs MTUM

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,388 trading days both funds were listed: 18 Apr 2013 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 13.4 years.

MTUM swung more than URTH: annualised volatility of 17.2% for URTH against 20.1% for MTUM, with URTH moving 1% or more on 23.9% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: URTH closed -11.38% and MTUM -12.37%.

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.81, and they closed in opposite directions on 19.7% of the 3,387 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 12 Jun 2013, when URTH moved +4.18% and MTUM -1.04%.

MeasureURTHMTUM
Annualised volatility17.2%20.1%
Worst day-11.38% on 16 Mar 2020-12.37% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+9.10% on 24 Mar 2020+10.65% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more23.9% of days30.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-34.01%-34.08%
Peak to trough12 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 202019 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak24 Aug 2020 · 5 months6 Jul 2020 · 3 months

Years URTH and MTUM parted ways

In 9 of the 13 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: URTH returned +23.95% and MTUM +9.15%, a gap of 14.8 points. They rose together in 10 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearURTHMTUMGap (URTH − MTUM)
2024+18.66%+32.89%-14.2 pts
2023+23.95%+9.15%+14.8 pts
2021+22.27%+13.36%+8.9 pts
2020+15.78%+29.86%-14.1 pts
2018-8.56%-1.67%-6.9 pts
2017+22.95%+37.50%-14.5 pts
2015-0.64%+8.91%-9.5 pts
2014+4.37%+14.62%-10.2 pts
2013+26.66%+19.21%+7.5 pts

How often URTH beat MTUM over any 12 months

Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, URTH finished ahead in 29.3% of them (44) and MTUM in 70.7% (106).

12-month windows
150
month-end to month-end, overlapping
URTH ahead
29.3%
44 of 150 windows
MTUM ahead
70.7%
106 of 150 windows

$200 a month into each, 2014–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2014 to December 2025 (144 payments, $28,800 in total) would have grown to $63,691 in URTH and $71,839 in MTUM, leaving MTUM $8,149 ahead.

OutcomeURTHMTUM
Paid in$28,800$28,800
Value at the end of 2025$63,691$71,839
Gain on the money paid in+$34,891+$43,039
Gain in %+121.15%+149.44%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is URTH or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between URTH and MTUM?

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — MTUM is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, URTH or MTUM?

MTUM swung more than URTH: annualised volatility of 17.2% for URTH against 20.1% for MTUM, with URTH moving 1% or more on 23.9% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: URTH closed -11.38% and MTUM -12.37%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, URTH or MTUM?

Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.

How often did URTH beat MTUM over a 12-month period?

Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, URTH finished ahead in 29.3% of them (44) and MTUM in 70.7% (106).

What would $10,000 in URTH have become?

$10,000 invested in URTH at the start of 2016 grew to $32,044 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring URTH or MTUM.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.