SCHG vs URTH: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexURTH tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 2016–2025
URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$20,931
SCHG made more of the same money

SCHG vs URTH, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
15
where both funds were trading
SCHG won
11
years
URTH won
4
years
YearSCHGURTHWinner
2026 (so far)+10.51%+11.76%URTH
2025+17.50%+21.36%URTH
2024+34.96%+18.66%SCHG
2023+50.11%+23.95%SCHG
2022-31.80%-17.97%URTH
2021+28.12%+22.27%SCHG
2020+39.14%+15.78%SCHG
2019+36.02%+28.15%SCHG
2018-1.36%-8.56%SCHG
2017+28.05%+22.95%SCHG
2016+6.55%+7.31%URTH
2015+3.24%-0.64%SCHG
2014+15.80%+4.37%SCHG
2013+34.04%+26.66%SCHG
2012+16.89%+14.71%SCHG
2011-0.74%——
2010+14.92%——

SCHG vs URTH in plain words

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 11 times and URTH 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SCHG vs URTH

FactSCHGURTH
FundSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFiShares MSCI World ETF
TracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.04%0.24%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched11 Dec 200910 Jan 2012
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in SCHG becameWhat $10,000 in URTH became

How bumpy the ride was: SCHG vs URTH

These head-to-head figures use only the 3,704 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Jan 2012 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 14.7 years.

SCHG swung more than URTH: annualised volatility of 19.4% for SCHG against 16.9% for URTH, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 29.4% of trading days and URTH on 23.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and URTH -11.38%.

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.85, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.7% of the 3,703 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 12 Jun 2013, when SCHG moved -0.88% and URTH +4.18%.

MeasureSCHGURTH
Annualised volatility19.4%16.9%
Worst day-12.55% on 16 Mar 2020-11.38% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.59% on 9 Apr 2025+9.10% on 24 Mar 2020
Days moving 1% or more29.4% of days23.5% of days
Deepest drawdown-34.59%-34.01%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 5 Jan 202312 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak18 Dec 2023 · 11 months24 Aug 2020 · 5 months

Years SCHG and URTH parted ways

In 10 of the 14 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: SCHG returned +50.11% and URTH +23.95%, a gap of 26.2 points. They rose together in 11 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearSCHGURTHGap (SCHG − URTH)
2024+34.96%+18.66%+16.3 pts
2023+50.11%+23.95%+26.2 pts
2022-31.80%-17.97%-13.8 pts
2021+28.12%+22.27%+5.8 pts
2020+39.14%+15.78%+23.4 pts
2019+36.02%+28.15%+7.9 pts
2018-1.36%-8.56%+7.2 pts
2017+28.05%+22.95%+5.1 pts
2014+15.80%+4.37%+11.4 pts
2013+34.04%+26.66%+7.4 pts

How often SCHG beat URTH over any 12 months

Across the 165 rolling 12-month windows since January 2012, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 80.0% of them (132) and URTH in 20.0% (33).

12-month windows
165
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SCHG ahead
80.0%
132 of 165 windows
URTH ahead
20.0%
33 of 165 windows

$200 a month into each, 2013–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2013 to December 2025 (156 payments, $31,200 in total) would have grown to $111,376 in SCHG and $72,749 in URTH, leaving SCHG $38,627 ahead.

OutcomeSCHGURTH
Paid in$31,200$31,200
Value at the end of 2025$111,376$72,749
Gain on the money paid in+$80,176+$41,549
Gain in %+256.97%+133.17%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SCHG or URTH better?

Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 11 times and URTH 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SCHG and URTH?

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, SCHG or URTH?

SCHG swung more than URTH: annualised volatility of 19.4% for SCHG against 16.9% for URTH, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 29.4% of trading days and URTH on 23.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and URTH -11.38%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SCHG or URTH?

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did SCHG beat URTH over a 12-month period?

Across the 165 rolling 12-month windows since January 2012, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 80.0% of them (132) and URTH in 20.0% (33).

What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?

$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or URTH.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.