SCHG vs ACWI: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 2016–2025
ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$22,267
SCHG made more of the same money

SCHG vs ACWI, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
SCHG won
13
years
ACWI won
4
years
YearSCHGACWIWinner
2026 (so far)+10.51%+12.94%ACWI
2025+17.50%+22.41%ACWI
2024+34.96%+17.45%SCHG
2023+50.11%+22.27%SCHG
2022-31.80%-18.39%ACWI
2021+28.12%+18.66%SCHG
2020+39.14%+16.34%SCHG
2019+36.02%+26.59%SCHG
2018-1.36%-9.12%SCHG
2017+28.05%+24.33%SCHG
2016+6.55%+8.40%ACWI
2015+3.24%-2.21%SCHG
2014+15.80%+3.83%SCHG
2013+34.04%+22.38%SCHG
2012+16.89%+16.75%SCHG
2011-0.74%-7.82%SCHG
2010+14.92%+12.78%SCHG
2009—+32.36%—
2008—-35.29%—

SCHG vs ACWI in plain words

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SCHG vs ACWI

FactSCHGACWI
FundSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFiShares MSCI ACWI ETF
TracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.04%0.32%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched11 Dec 200926 Mar 2008
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in SCHG becameWhat $10,000 in ACWI became

How bumpy the ride was: SCHG vs ACWI

These head-to-head figures use only the 4,215 trading days both funds were listed: 4 Jan 2010 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 16.7 years.

SCHG swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 19.7% for SCHG against 17.2% for ACWI, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 30.1% of trading days and ACWI on 24.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and ACWI -11.22%.

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; ACWI fell -33.53% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.92, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.5% of the 4,214 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Nov 2020, when SCHG moved -2.03% and ACWI +1.45%.

MeasureSCHGACWI
Annualised volatility19.7%17.2%
Worst day-12.55% on 16 Mar 2020-11.22% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.59% on 9 Apr 2025+8.79% on 9 Apr 2025
Days moving 1% or more30.1% of days24.8% of days
Deepest drawdown-34.59%-33.53%
Peak to trough19 Nov 2021 → 5 Jan 202312 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020
Back above the old peak18 Dec 2023 · 11 months24 Aug 2020 · 5 months

Years SCHG and ACWI parted ways

In 11 of the 16 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: SCHG returned +50.11% and ACWI +22.27%, a gap of 27.8 points. They rose together in 12 years, fell together in 3 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearSCHGACWIGap (SCHG − ACWI)
2024+34.96%+17.45%+17.5 pts
2023+50.11%+22.27%+27.8 pts
2022-31.80%-18.39%-13.4 pts
2021+28.12%+18.66%+9.5 pts
2020+39.14%+16.34%+22.8 pts
2019+36.02%+26.59%+9.4 pts
2018-1.36%-9.12%+7.8 pts
2015+3.24%-2.21%+5.5 pts
2014+15.80%+3.83%+12.0 pts
2013+34.04%+22.38%+11.7 pts
2011-0.74%-7.82%+7.1 pts

How often SCHG beat ACWI over any 12 months

Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 82.5% of them (156) and ACWI in 17.5% (33).

12-month windows
189
month-end to month-end, overlapping
SCHG ahead
82.5%
156 of 189 windows
ACWI ahead
17.5%
33 of 189 windows

$200 a month into each, 2011–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2011 to December 2025 (180 payments, $36,000 in total) would have grown to $155,821 in SCHG and $89,217 in ACWI, leaving SCHG $66,604 ahead.

OutcomeSCHGACWI
Paid in$36,000$36,000
Value at the end of 2025$155,821$89,217
Gain on the money paid in+$119,821+$53,217
Gain in %+332.84%+147.83%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is SCHG or ACWI better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SCHG and ACWI?

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, SCHG or ACWI?

SCHG swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 19.7% for SCHG against 17.2% for ACWI, with SCHG moving 1% or more on 30.1% of trading days and ACWI on 24.8%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: SCHG closed -12.55% and ACWI -11.22%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, SCHG or ACWI?

SCHG had the deeper drawdown: it fell -34.59% from its peak on 19 Nov 2021 to a low on 5 Jan 2023, then closed back above the old peak on 18 Dec 2023, 11 months after the low; ACWI fell -33.53% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.

How often did SCHG beat ACWI over a 12-month period?

Across the 189 rolling 12-month windows since January 2010, measured month-end to month-end, SCHG finished ahead in 82.5% of them (156) and ACWI in 17.5% (33).

What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?

$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or ACWI.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.