ACWI vs URTH: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
ACWI
URTH
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexURTH tracks the MSCI World Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
ACWI vs URTH, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | ACWI | URTH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.94% | +11.76% | ACWI |
| 2025 | +22.41% | +21.36% | ACWI |
| 2024 | +17.45% | +18.66% | URTH |
| 2023 | +22.27% | +23.95% | URTH |
| 2022 | -18.39% | -17.97% | URTH |
| 2021 | +18.66% | +22.27% | URTH |
| 2020 | +16.34% | +15.78% | ACWI |
| 2019 | +26.59% | +28.15% | URTH |
| 2018 | -9.12% | -8.56% | URTH |
| 2017 | +24.33% | +22.95% | ACWI |
| 2016 | +8.40% | +7.31% | ACWI |
| 2015 | -2.21% | -0.64% | URTH |
| 2014 | +3.83% | +4.37% | URTH |
| 2013 | +22.38% | +26.66% | URTH |
| 2012 | +16.75% | +14.71% | ACWI |
| 2011 | -7.82% | — | — |
| 2010 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2009 | +32.36% | — | — |
| 2008 | -35.29% | — | — |
ACWI vs URTH in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — URTH is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 6 times and URTH 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: ACWI vs URTH
| Fact | ACWI | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares MSCI World ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | MSCI World Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Mar 2008 | 10 Jan 2012 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in ACWI became | What $10,000 in URTH became |
How bumpy the ride was: ACWI vs URTH
These head-to-head figures use only the 3,704 trading days both funds were listed: 12 Jan 2012 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 14.7 years.
URTH swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 16.1% for ACWI against 16.9% for URTH, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 23.0% of trading days and URTH on 23.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and URTH -11.38%.
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: ACWI fell -33.53% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low; URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.90, and they closed in opposite directions on 8.9% of the 3,703 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 12 Jun 2013, when ACWI moved -0.49% and URTH +4.18%.
| Measure | ACWI | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.1% | 16.9% |
| Worst day | -11.22% on 16 Mar 2020 | -11.38% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +8.79% on 9 Apr 2025 | +9.10% on 24 Mar 2020 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 23.0% of days | 23.5% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.53% | -34.01% |
| Peak to trough | 12 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 12 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 24 Aug 2020 · 5 months | 24 Aug 2020 · 5 months |
Years ACWI and URTH parted ways
In none of the 14 completed calendar years both funds were trading did the two returns end more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2013: ACWI returned +22.38% and URTH +26.66%, a gap of 4.3 points. They rose together in 11 years and fell together in 3 years.
How often ACWI beat URTH over any 12 months
Across the 165 rolling 12-month windows since January 2012, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 34.5% of them (57) and URTH in 65.5% (108).
$200 a month into each, 2013–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2013 to December 2025 (156 payments, $31,200 in total) would have grown to $69,375 in ACWI and $72,749 in URTH, leaving URTH $3,374 ahead.
| Outcome | ACWI | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $31,200 | $31,200 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $69,375 | $72,749 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$38,175 | +$41,549 |
| Gain in % | +122.36% | +133.17% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is ACWI or URTH better?
Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 6 times and URTH 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between ACWI and URTH?
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — URTH is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, ACWI or URTH?
URTH swung more than ACWI: annualised volatility of 16.1% for ACWI against 16.9% for URTH, with ACWI moving 1% or more on 23.0% of trading days and URTH on 23.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: ACWI closed -11.22% and URTH -11.38%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, ACWI or URTH?
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: ACWI fell -33.53% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low; URTH fell -34.01% from its peak on 12 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Aug 2020, 5 months after the low.
How often did ACWI beat URTH over a 12-month period?
Across the 165 rolling 12-month windows since January 2012, measured month-end to month-end, ACWI finished ahead in 34.5% of them (57) and URTH in 65.5% (108).
What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?
$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or URTH.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.