OriginaveIVV vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVV
SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trusttracks the S&P 500 Index
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETFtracks the S&P 500 Index- IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETFtracks the S&P 500 Index
- VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETFtracks the CRSP US Total Market Index
QQQInvesco QQQ Trusttracks the Nasdaq-100 Index- QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VGTVanguard Information Technology ETFtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETFtracks the MSCI ACWI Index
- VTVanguard Total World Stock ETFtracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
- URTHiShares MSCI World ETFtracks the MSCI World Index
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index- SCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index
- VTVVanguard Value ETFtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
- VUGVanguard Growth ETFtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
- MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFtracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
- SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETFtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
- SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETFtracks the S&P 500 Quality Index
MTUM
- SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trusttracks the S&P 500 Index
- VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETFtracks the S&P 500 Index
- IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETFtracks the S&P 500 Index
- VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETFtracks the CRSP US Total Market Index
- QQQInvesco QQQ Trusttracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
- VGTVanguard Information Technology ETFtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETFtracks the MSCI ACWI Index
- VTVanguard Total World Stock ETFtracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
- URTHiShares MSCI World ETFtracks the MSCI World Index
- SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
- SCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index
- VTVVanguard Value ETFtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
- VUGVanguard Growth ETFtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
- MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFtracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
- SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETFtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
- SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETFtracks the S&P 500 Quality Index
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs MTUM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | MTUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.74% | +27.29% | MTUM |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +22.15% | MTUM |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +32.89% | MTUM |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +9.15% | IVV |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -18.27% | IVV |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +13.36% | IVV |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +29.86% | MTUM |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +27.25% | IVV |
| 2018 | -4.49% | -1.67% | MTUM |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.50% | MTUM |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +5.00% | IVV |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +8.91% | MTUM |
| 2014 | +13.57% | +14.62% | MTUM |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +19.21% | IVV |
| 2012 | +16.06% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.88% | — | — |
| 2010 | +15.10% | — | — |
| 2009 | +26.61% | — | — |
| 2008 | -37.01% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.29% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.94% | — | — |
| 2005 | +4.87% | — | — |
| 2004 | +10.79% | — | — |
| 2003 | +28.46% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.53% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.96% | — | — |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs MTUM in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs MTUM
| Fact | IVV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 16 Apr 2013 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in IVV became | What $10,000 in MTUM became |
How bumpy the ride was: IVV vs MTUM
These head-to-head figures use only the 3,388 trading days both funds were listed: 18 Apr 2013 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 13.4 years.
MTUM swung more than IVV: annualised volatility of 16.9% for IVV against 20.1% for MTUM, with IVV moving 1% or more on 23.0% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and MTUM -12.37%.
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: IVV fell -33.90% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.88, and they closed in opposite directions on 16.4% of the 3,387 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 1 Jul 2026, when IVV moved +0.03% and MTUM -4.30%.
| Measure | IVV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 16.9% | 20.1% |
| Worst day | -11.57% on 16 Mar 2020 | -12.37% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +9.51% on 9 Apr 2025 | +10.65% on 24 Mar 2020 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 23.0% of days | 30.5% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.90% | -34.08% |
| Peak to trough | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 | 19 Feb 2020 → 23 Mar 2020 |
| Back above the old peak | 10 Aug 2020 · 4 months | 6 Jul 2020 · 3 months |
Years IVV and MTUM parted ways
In 8 of the 13 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: IVV returned +26.31% and MTUM +9.15%, a gap of 17.2 points. They rose together in 11 years and fell together in 2 years.
| Year | IVV | MTUM | Gap (IVV − MTUM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +24.93% | +32.89% | -8.0 pts |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +9.15% | +17.2 pts |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +13.36% | +15.4 pts |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +29.86% | -11.5 pts |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.50% | -15.7 pts |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +5.00% | +6.5 pts |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +8.91% | -7.6 pts |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +19.21% | +13.1 pts |
How often IVV beat MTUM over any 12 months
Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 36.7% of them (55) and MTUM in 63.3% (95).
$200 a month into each, 2014–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2014 to December 2025 (144 payments, $28,800 in total) would have grown to $73,937 in IVV and $71,839 in MTUM, leaving IVV $2,098 ahead.
| Outcome | IVV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $28,800 | $28,800 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $73,937 | $71,839 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$45,137 | +$43,039 |
| Gain in % | +156.73% | +149.44% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is IVV or MTUM better?
Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and MTUM?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, IVV or MTUM?
MTUM swung more than IVV: annualised volatility of 16.9% for IVV against 20.1% for MTUM, with IVV moving 1% or more on 23.0% of trading days and MTUM on 30.5%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and MTUM -12.37%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, IVV or MTUM?
Both funds suffered a drawdown of about the same depth: IVV fell -33.90% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Aug 2020, 4 months after the low; MTUM fell -34.08% from its peak on 19 Feb 2020 to a low on 23 Mar 2020, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jul 2020, 3 months after the low.
How often did IVV beat MTUM over a 12-month period?
Across the 150 rolling 12-month windows since April 2013, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 36.7% of them (55) and MTUM in 63.3% (95).
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.