IVV vs VGT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVV
VGT
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexVGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs VGT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | VGT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.74% | +33.83% | VGT |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +21.77% | VGT |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +29.30% | VGT |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +52.66% | VGT |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -29.70% | IVV |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +30.45% | VGT |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +46.04% | VGT |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +48.62% | VGT |
| 2018 | -4.49% | +2.46% | VGT |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.08% | VGT |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +13.77% | VGT |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +5.05% | VGT |
| 2014 | +13.57% | +16.69% | VGT |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +30.97% | IVV |
| 2012 | +16.06% | +13.96% | IVV |
| 2011 | +1.88% | +0.54% | IVV |
| 2010 | +15.10% | +12.78% | IVV |
| 2009 | +26.61% | +61.89% | VGT |
| 2008 | -37.01% | -42.82% | IVV |
| 2007 | +5.29% | +14.78% | VGT |
| 2006 | +15.94% | +8.85% | IVV |
| 2005 | +4.87% | +3.00% | IVV |
| 2004 | +10.79% | -2.86% | IVV |
| 2003 | +28.46% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.53% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.96% | — | — |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs VGT in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 9 times and VGT 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs VGT
| Fact | IVV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard Information Technology ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.09% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 26 Jan 2004 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in IVV became | What $10,000 in VGT became |
How bumpy the ride was: IVV vs VGT
These head-to-head figures use only the 5,707 trading days both funds were listed: 30 Jan 2004 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 22.6 years.
VGT swung more than IVV: annualised volatility of 18.5% for IVV against 22.7% for VGT, with IVV moving 1% or more on 24.9% of trading days and VGT on 36.4%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and VGT -13.49%.
IVV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -55.25% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Aug 2012, 41 months after the low; VGT fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.90, and they closed in opposite directions on 15.6% of the 5,706 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Oct 2008, when IVV moved -6.60% and VGT -2.52%.
| Measure | IVV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 18.5% | 22.7% |
| Worst day | -11.57% on 16 Mar 2020 | -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +11.10% on 28 Oct 2008 | +13.48% on 9 Apr 2025 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 24.9% of days | 36.4% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -55.25% | -54.63% |
| Peak to trough | 9 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 | 31 Oct 2007 → 20 Nov 2008 |
| Back above the old peak | 16 Aug 2012 · 41 months | 6 Jan 2011 · 25 months |
Years IVV and VGT parted ways
In 11 of the 22 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2009: IVV returned +26.61% and VGT +61.89%, a gap of 35.3 points. They rose together in 18 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 2 years.
| Year | IVV | VGT | Gap (IVV − VGT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | +26.31% | +52.66% | -26.4 pts |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -29.70% | +11.5 pts |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +46.04% | -27.6 pts |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +48.62% | -17.4 pts |
| 2018 | -4.49% | +2.46% | -6.9 pts |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.08% | -15.3 pts |
| 2009 | +26.61% | +61.89% | -35.3 pts |
| 2008 | -37.01% | -42.82% | +5.8 pts |
| 2007 | +5.29% | +14.78% | -9.5 pts |
| 2006 | +15.94% | +8.85% | +7.1 pts |
| 2004 | +10.79% | -2.86% | +13.7 pts |
How often IVV beat VGT over any 12 months
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 27.2% of them (71) and VGT in 72.8% (190).
$200 a month into each, 2005–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2005 to December 2025 (252 payments, $50,400 in total) would have grown to $234,304 in IVV and $470,456 in VGT, leaving VGT $236,152 ahead.
| Outcome | IVV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $50,400 | $50,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $234,304 | $470,456 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$183,904 | +$420,056 |
| Gain in % | +364.89% | +833.44% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is IVV or VGT better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 9 times and VGT 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and VGT?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, IVV or VGT?
VGT swung more than IVV: annualised volatility of 18.5% for IVV against 22.7% for VGT, with IVV moving 1% or more on 24.9% of trading days and VGT on 36.4%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: IVV closed -11.57% and VGT -13.49%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, IVV or VGT?
IVV had the deeper drawdown: it fell -55.25% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 16 Aug 2012, 41 months after the low; VGT fell -54.63% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 6 Jan 2011, 25 months after the low.
How often did IVV beat VGT over a 12-month period?
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, IVV finished ahead in 27.2% of them (71) and VGT in 72.8% (190).
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.