VGT vs VT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VGT
VT
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexVT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VGT vs VT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VGT | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +33.83% | +12.86% | VGT |
| 2025 | +21.77% | +22.43% | VT |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +16.49% | VGT |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +22.02% | VGT |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -18.00% | VT |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +18.27% | VGT |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +16.59% | VGT |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +26.81% | VGT |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -9.76% | VGT |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +24.50% | VGT |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +8.50% | VGT |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -1.86% | VGT |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +3.68% | VGT |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +22.94% | VGT |
| 2012 | +13.96% | +17.12% | VT |
| 2011 | +0.54% | -7.51% | VGT |
| 2010 | +12.78% | +13.08% | VT |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +32.66% | VGT |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -33.05% | VT |
| 2007 | +14.78% | — | — |
| 2006 | +8.85% | — | — |
| 2005 | +3.00% | — | — |
| 2004 | -2.86% | — | — |
VGT vs VT in plain words
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VT 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VGT vs VT
| Fact | VGT | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard Total World Stock ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 24 Jun 2008 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VGT became | What $10,000 in VT became |
How bumpy the ride was: VGT vs VT
These head-to-head figures use only the 4,598 trading days both funds were listed: 26 Jun 2008 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 18.2 years.
VGT swung more than VT: annualised volatility of 23.8% for VGT against 20.4% for VT, with VGT moving 1% or more on 37.6% of trading days and VT on 27.3%. VGT's worst day was -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020; VT's was -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008.
VT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -50.26% from its peak on 26 Jun 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 29 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low; VGT fell -47.26% from its peak on 15 Aug 2008 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Dec 2009, 13 months after the low.
Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.87, and they closed in opposite directions on 17.2% of the 4,597 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 29 Oct 2008, when VGT moved -0.22% and VT +7.37%.
| Measure | VGT | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 23.8% | 20.4% |
| Worst day | -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020 | -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008 |
| Best day | +13.48% on 9 Apr 2025 | +13.45% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 37.6% of days | 27.3% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -47.26% | -50.26% |
| Peak to trough | 15 Aug 2008 → 20 Nov 2008 | 26 Jun 2008 → 9 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 24 Dec 2009 · 13 months | 29 Dec 2010 · 21 months |
Years VGT and VT parted ways
In 15 of the 18 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VGT returned +52.66% and VT +22.02%, a gap of 30.6 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 2 years and went opposite ways in 3 years.
| Year | VGT | VT | Gap (VGT − VT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +29.30% | +16.49% | +12.8 pts |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +22.02% | +30.6 pts |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -18.00% | -11.7 pts |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +18.27% | +12.2 pts |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +16.59% | +29.5 pts |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +26.81% | +21.8 pts |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -9.76% | +12.2 pts |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +24.50% | +12.6 pts |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +8.50% | +5.3 pts |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -1.86% | +6.9 pts |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +3.68% | +13.0 pts |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +22.94% | +8.0 pts |
| 2011 | +0.54% | -7.51% | +8.1 pts |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +32.66% | +29.2 pts |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -33.05% | -9.8 pts |
How often VGT beat VT over any 12 months
Across the 208 rolling 12-month windows since June 2008, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 86.1% of them (179) and VT in 13.9% (29).
$200 a month into each, 2009–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2009 to December 2025 (204 payments, $40,800 in total) would have grown to $299,109 in VGT and $114,121 in VT, leaving VGT $184,988 ahead.
| Outcome | VGT | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $40,800 | $40,800 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $299,109 | $114,121 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$258,309 | +$73,321 |
| Gain in % | +633.11% | +179.71% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VGT or VT better?
Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VT 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VGT and VT?
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VGT or VT?
VGT swung more than VT: annualised volatility of 23.8% for VGT against 20.4% for VT, with VGT moving 1% or more on 37.6% of trading days and VT on 27.3%. VGT's worst day was -13.49% on 16 Mar 2020; VT's was -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VGT or VT?
VT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -50.26% from its peak on 26 Jun 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 29 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low; VGT fell -47.26% from its peak on 15 Aug 2008 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 24 Dec 2009, 13 months after the low.
How often did VGT beat VT over a 12-month period?
Across the 208 rolling 12-month windows since June 2008, measured month-end to month-end, VGT finished ahead in 86.1% of them (179) and VT in 13.9% (29).
What would $10,000 in VGT have become?
$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.